欧盟基本权利宪章及其对劳动法的影响:比例检验“光”的诉求

H. Voogsgeerd
{"title":"欧盟基本权利宪章及其对劳动法的影响:比例检验“光”的诉求","authors":"H. Voogsgeerd","doi":"10.3249/1868-1581-4-1-VOOGSGEERD","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, fundamental human rights have occupied an important place in labor law. The ILO constitution of 1919 focuses, for example, on the right of freedom of association. Subsequent ILO documents stress other fundamental rights such as the right to non-discrimination in the field of labor. The fundamental rights of the worker did begin to get some attention in the EU too, especially in non-binding documents such as the Community Charter of the Rights of the Worker from 1989. Since the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon in 2009, the Charter of Fundamental Rights introduced at the summit in Nice is legally binding to the same extent as the EU Treaty itself. The Charter includes fundamental rights in the field of labor law under the heading ‘solidarity'. In this article two basic questions will be addressed. The first question will address the ‘old' issue of the clash between fundamental (labor) rights and the four economic freedoms of the EU, which are seen by the ECJ as of fundamental nature as well. Since the seminal cases of Viking and Laval, a lot has been written about this theme by both European and labor lawyers. I will not revisit the literature that has been written about these cases, but the more dogmatic issue of a (potential) clash between the four economic freedoms and the fundamental rights is still in need of clarification. The second question is whether the fundamental human rights will get a more important place in the case law of the European Court of Justice now that the Charter of Fundamental Rights is of binding character, or, will there be just a continuation of the already developed relationship between fundamental freedoms and rights or between two different kind of fundamental human rights? I will focus here on case law in the field of labor law. The article will finish with a plea for a proportionality test ‘light' in order to limit the interference of EU law with the essence of fundamental rights.","PeriodicalId":360658,"journal":{"name":"Goettingen Journal of International Law","volume":"445 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and its Impact on Labor Law : a Plea for a Proportionality-Test \\\"Light\\\"\",\"authors\":\"H. Voogsgeerd\",\"doi\":\"10.3249/1868-1581-4-1-VOOGSGEERD\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traditionally, fundamental human rights have occupied an important place in labor law. The ILO constitution of 1919 focuses, for example, on the right of freedom of association. Subsequent ILO documents stress other fundamental rights such as the right to non-discrimination in the field of labor. The fundamental rights of the worker did begin to get some attention in the EU too, especially in non-binding documents such as the Community Charter of the Rights of the Worker from 1989. Since the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon in 2009, the Charter of Fundamental Rights introduced at the summit in Nice is legally binding to the same extent as the EU Treaty itself. The Charter includes fundamental rights in the field of labor law under the heading ‘solidarity'. In this article two basic questions will be addressed. The first question will address the ‘old' issue of the clash between fundamental (labor) rights and the four economic freedoms of the EU, which are seen by the ECJ as of fundamental nature as well. Since the seminal cases of Viking and Laval, a lot has been written about this theme by both European and labor lawyers. I will not revisit the literature that has been written about these cases, but the more dogmatic issue of a (potential) clash between the four economic freedoms and the fundamental rights is still in need of clarification. The second question is whether the fundamental human rights will get a more important place in the case law of the European Court of Justice now that the Charter of Fundamental Rights is of binding character, or, will there be just a continuation of the already developed relationship between fundamental freedoms and rights or between two different kind of fundamental human rights? I will focus here on case law in the field of labor law. The article will finish with a plea for a proportionality test ‘light' in order to limit the interference of EU law with the essence of fundamental rights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Goettingen Journal of International Law\",\"volume\":\"445 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Goettingen Journal of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3249/1868-1581-4-1-VOOGSGEERD\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Goettingen Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3249/1868-1581-4-1-VOOGSGEERD","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

传统上,基本人权在劳动法中占有重要地位。例如,1919年的国际劳工组织章程着重于结社自由的权利。随后的劳工组织文件强调了其他基本权利,例如在劳工领域不受歧视的权利。在欧盟,工人的基本权利也开始得到一些关注,特别是在1989年的《共同体工人权利宪章》等非约束性文件中。自2009年《里斯本条约》生效以来,尼斯峰会上提出的《基本权利宪章》具有与《欧盟条约》同等的法律约束力。《宪章》在“团结”的标题下包括劳动法领域的基本权利。本文将讨论两个基本问题。第一个问题将解决“老”问题,即欧盟的基本(劳动)权利与欧盟的四项经济自由之间的冲突,这四项权利也被欧洲法院视为基本性质。自维京和拉瓦尔的开创性案例以来,欧洲和劳工律师都写了很多关于这一主题的文章。我不会重述关于这些案例的文献,但四项经济自由与基本权利之间(潜在的)冲突这一更为教条的问题仍需要澄清。第二个问题是,既然《基本权利宪章》具有约束力,基本人权是否会在欧洲法院的判例法中占据更重要的地位,或者,基本自由和权利之间或两种不同的基本人权之间的关系是否会继续发展?在这里,我将重点讨论劳动法领域的判例法。这篇文章将以一个相称性测试“光”的请求来结束,以限制欧盟法律对基本权利本质的干涉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and its Impact on Labor Law : a Plea for a Proportionality-Test "Light"
Traditionally, fundamental human rights have occupied an important place in labor law. The ILO constitution of 1919 focuses, for example, on the right of freedom of association. Subsequent ILO documents stress other fundamental rights such as the right to non-discrimination in the field of labor. The fundamental rights of the worker did begin to get some attention in the EU too, especially in non-binding documents such as the Community Charter of the Rights of the Worker from 1989. Since the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon in 2009, the Charter of Fundamental Rights introduced at the summit in Nice is legally binding to the same extent as the EU Treaty itself. The Charter includes fundamental rights in the field of labor law under the heading ‘solidarity'. In this article two basic questions will be addressed. The first question will address the ‘old' issue of the clash between fundamental (labor) rights and the four economic freedoms of the EU, which are seen by the ECJ as of fundamental nature as well. Since the seminal cases of Viking and Laval, a lot has been written about this theme by both European and labor lawyers. I will not revisit the literature that has been written about these cases, but the more dogmatic issue of a (potential) clash between the four economic freedoms and the fundamental rights is still in need of clarification. The second question is whether the fundamental human rights will get a more important place in the case law of the European Court of Justice now that the Charter of Fundamental Rights is of binding character, or, will there be just a continuation of the already developed relationship between fundamental freedoms and rights or between two different kind of fundamental human rights? I will focus here on case law in the field of labor law. The article will finish with a plea for a proportionality test ‘light' in order to limit the interference of EU law with the essence of fundamental rights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信