关于仲裁和替代性争议解决的第30/1999号法律第66 (C)条规范的模糊性:原因、影响和解决办法

Muhamad Dzadit Taqwa, Tazkia Nafs Azzahra, Maria Jasmine Putri Subiyanto
{"title":"关于仲裁和替代性争议解决的第30/1999号法律第66 (C)条规范的模糊性:原因、影响和解决办法","authors":"Muhamad Dzadit Taqwa, Tazkia Nafs Azzahra, Maria Jasmine Putri Subiyanto","doi":"10.20884/1.jdh.2022.22.1.3146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to Article 66 Letter C of Law Number 30/1999, one of the requirements for an international arbitral award to be accepted and executed in Indonesia is that it does not violate public order. There is an issue with the norms’ ambiguity; it concerns the definition and the application of the term \"public order\". As a result, international arbitration awards are more likely to be overturned based on quo conditions. This paper explores the causes and the implications of this ambiguous term. Following then, various potential resolutions to the problem were provided. but removing the article might not be a wise option. Although various publications have studied the recognition and execution of foreign arbitral awards, no comprehensive examination of Article 66 Letter C of Law Number 30/1999 could be identified.","PeriodicalId":280058,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Dinamika Hukum","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ambiguity of Norms in Article 66 (C) of Law No. 30/1999 on Arbitration And Alternative Dispute Resolution: Causes, Implications And Resolutions\",\"authors\":\"Muhamad Dzadit Taqwa, Tazkia Nafs Azzahra, Maria Jasmine Putri Subiyanto\",\"doi\":\"10.20884/1.jdh.2022.22.1.3146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to Article 66 Letter C of Law Number 30/1999, one of the requirements for an international arbitral award to be accepted and executed in Indonesia is that it does not violate public order. There is an issue with the norms’ ambiguity; it concerns the definition and the application of the term \\\"public order\\\". As a result, international arbitration awards are more likely to be overturned based on quo conditions. This paper explores the causes and the implications of this ambiguous term. Following then, various potential resolutions to the problem were provided. but removing the article might not be a wise option. Although various publications have studied the recognition and execution of foreign arbitral awards, no comprehensive examination of Article 66 Letter C of Law Number 30/1999 could be identified.\",\"PeriodicalId\":280058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Dinamika Hukum\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Dinamika Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2022.22.1.3146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Dinamika Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2022.22.1.3146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据第30/1999号法律第66条C字母,在印度尼西亚接受和执行国际仲裁裁决的要求之一是它不违反公共秩序。规范的模糊性存在一个问题;它涉及“公共秩序”一词的定义和适用。因此,国际仲裁裁决更有可能根据现状被推翻。本文探讨了这一模糊术语产生的原因和含义。随后,提出了解决这一问题的各种可能办法。但删除这篇文章可能不是一个明智的选择。虽然各种出版物都研究了外国仲裁裁决的承认和执行,但没有对第30/1999号法律第66条C字母进行全面审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Ambiguity of Norms in Article 66 (C) of Law No. 30/1999 on Arbitration And Alternative Dispute Resolution: Causes, Implications And Resolutions
According to Article 66 Letter C of Law Number 30/1999, one of the requirements for an international arbitral award to be accepted and executed in Indonesia is that it does not violate public order. There is an issue with the norms’ ambiguity; it concerns the definition and the application of the term "public order". As a result, international arbitration awards are more likely to be overturned based on quo conditions. This paper explores the causes and the implications of this ambiguous term. Following then, various potential resolutions to the problem were provided. but removing the article might not be a wise option. Although various publications have studied the recognition and execution of foreign arbitral awards, no comprehensive examination of Article 66 Letter C of Law Number 30/1999 could be identified.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信