混合方法试点研究:催眠分娩对分娩结果的有效性

T. Paramasivam, Umapathi Mariappan, C. Chan
{"title":"混合方法试点研究:催眠分娩对分娩结果的有效性","authors":"T. Paramasivam, Umapathi Mariappan, C. Chan","doi":"10.2478/9783110680041-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Childbirth is commonly associated with pain. HypnoBirthing®Mongan method used during pregnancy and birthing offers women to be relaxed and fear-free. The study analyses the effectiveness of HypnoBirthing in labour outcomes using mixed methods. A quasi-experimental study conducted in a private hospital, Malaysia, involving 30 primigravidas followed by a qualitative interview among two samples within 48 hours after childbirth. The experimental group (HypnoBirthing) and control group (IM Pethidine) had 15 samples each. Pain assessed via Visual Analogue and Yazbek’s Labour Pain Score, together with the perineal outcome. Results showed a statistically significant difference in pain score (p=0.031) HypnoBirthing and control group (p=0.000). Perineal outcome revealed experimental group had less second-degree tear (n=3, 20%) compared to control group (n=10, 66.6%). The qualitative result reveals participants were in control of themselves throughout childbirth and enjoyed the process. Women utilizing HypnoBirthing had better pain management than those receiving IM Pethidine.","PeriodicalId":300108,"journal":{"name":"Enhancing Capacity of Healthcare Scholars and professionals in Responding to the Global Health Issues","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mixed-Method Pilot Study: Effectiveness of HypnoBirthing in Labour Outcomes\",\"authors\":\"T. Paramasivam, Umapathi Mariappan, C. Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/9783110680041-001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". Childbirth is commonly associated with pain. HypnoBirthing®Mongan method used during pregnancy and birthing offers women to be relaxed and fear-free. The study analyses the effectiveness of HypnoBirthing in labour outcomes using mixed methods. A quasi-experimental study conducted in a private hospital, Malaysia, involving 30 primigravidas followed by a qualitative interview among two samples within 48 hours after childbirth. The experimental group (HypnoBirthing) and control group (IM Pethidine) had 15 samples each. Pain assessed via Visual Analogue and Yazbek’s Labour Pain Score, together with the perineal outcome. Results showed a statistically significant difference in pain score (p=0.031) HypnoBirthing and control group (p=0.000). Perineal outcome revealed experimental group had less second-degree tear (n=3, 20%) compared to control group (n=10, 66.6%). The qualitative result reveals participants were in control of themselves throughout childbirth and enjoyed the process. Women utilizing HypnoBirthing had better pain management than those receiving IM Pethidine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enhancing Capacity of Healthcare Scholars and professionals in Responding to the Global Health Issues\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enhancing Capacity of Healthcare Scholars and professionals in Responding to the Global Health Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/9783110680041-001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enhancing Capacity of Healthcare Scholars and professionals in Responding to the Global Health Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/9783110680041-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

. 分娩通常伴随着疼痛。催眠分娩®蒙根方法在怀孕和分娩期间使用,为妇女提供放松和无恐惧。本研究采用混合方法分析催眠分娩对分娩结果的影响。在马来西亚一家私立医院进行的一项准实验研究,涉及30名初产妇,随后在分娩后48小时内对两个样本进行定性访谈。实验组(HypnoBirthing)和对照组(IM Pethidine)各15个样本。通过视觉模拟和Yazbek分娩疼痛评分评估疼痛,以及会阴结果。结果显示,催眠分娩组与对照组疼痛评分差异有统计学意义(p=0.031)。会阴结果显示实验组二度撕裂(n=3, 20%)少于对照组(n=10, 66.6%)。定性结果显示,参与者在整个分娩过程中都能控制自己,并享受这个过程。使用催眠分娩的妇女比使用IM哌啶的妇女有更好的疼痛管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mixed-Method Pilot Study: Effectiveness of HypnoBirthing in Labour Outcomes
. Childbirth is commonly associated with pain. HypnoBirthing®Mongan method used during pregnancy and birthing offers women to be relaxed and fear-free. The study analyses the effectiveness of HypnoBirthing in labour outcomes using mixed methods. A quasi-experimental study conducted in a private hospital, Malaysia, involving 30 primigravidas followed by a qualitative interview among two samples within 48 hours after childbirth. The experimental group (HypnoBirthing) and control group (IM Pethidine) had 15 samples each. Pain assessed via Visual Analogue and Yazbek’s Labour Pain Score, together with the perineal outcome. Results showed a statistically significant difference in pain score (p=0.031) HypnoBirthing and control group (p=0.000). Perineal outcome revealed experimental group had less second-degree tear (n=3, 20%) compared to control group (n=10, 66.6%). The qualitative result reveals participants were in control of themselves throughout childbirth and enjoyed the process. Women utilizing HypnoBirthing had better pain management than those receiving IM Pethidine.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信