“三派论”——兼论“三派论”

.H.aoginlen Chongloi
{"title":"“三派论”——兼论“三派论”","authors":".H.aoginlen Chongloi","doi":"10.31901/24566799.2021-22/20.1-2.427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Kukis practise the traditional institution called Chieftainship, which i~ stil.l in exis~ence today. Every village is governed under such an institution headed by a chief called Haosa. The chief along wtth hts counctl~en, ~ho are elected. on ter'ilire basis, works for the welfare of the villagers. In return the villagers have the obligation of pay~ng tnbu~es to t~e ~ht~f, which is purely voluntary in nature. However, there are continuing debates among the you.nge.r ge~era~10n over tts cont.mUity m the advent of democracy. This paper will discuss the different schools of thought on KuiG chteftamshJp and thereafte1 suggest what possibly could be the most appropriate approach to the debate on Kuki Chieftainship.","PeriodicalId":398563,"journal":{"name":"Studies of Tribes and Tribals","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Three Schools of Thought on l{uki Chieftainship: A l.,heoretical Approach\",\"authors\":\".H.aoginlen Chongloi\",\"doi\":\"10.31901/24566799.2021-22/20.1-2.427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Kukis practise the traditional institution called Chieftainship, which i~ stil.l in exis~ence today. Every village is governed under such an institution headed by a chief called Haosa. The chief along wtth hts counctl~en, ~ho are elected. on ter'ilire basis, works for the welfare of the villagers. In return the villagers have the obligation of pay~ng tnbu~es to t~e ~ht~f, which is purely voluntary in nature. However, there are continuing debates among the you.nge.r ge~era~10n over tts cont.mUity m the advent of democracy. This paper will discuss the different schools of thought on KuiG chteftamshJp and thereafte1 suggest what possibly could be the most appropriate approach to the debate on Kuki Chieftainship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":398563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies of Tribes and Tribals\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies of Tribes and Tribals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31901/24566799.2021-22/20.1-2.427\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies of Tribes and Tribals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31901/24566799.2021-22/20.1-2.427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

库奇人实行传统的“酋长制”,这种制度至今仍在沿用。今天我还活着。每个村庄都由这样一个机构管理,这个机构由一个叫做豪萨的酋长领导。酋长和他的议员们都是选举出来的。在他们的基础上,为村民的福利工作。作为回报,村民们有义务支付100万美元的现金,这在本质上是完全自愿的。然而,在美国的年轻人中,关于民主到来的意义的争论仍在继续。本文将讨论关于国族酋长制的不同思想流派,然后提出可能是最合适的方法来讨论国族酋长制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Three Schools of Thought on l{uki Chieftainship: A l.,heoretical Approach
The Kukis practise the traditional institution called Chieftainship, which i~ stil.l in exis~ence today. Every village is governed under such an institution headed by a chief called Haosa. The chief along wtth hts counctl~en, ~ho are elected. on ter'ilire basis, works for the welfare of the villagers. In return the villagers have the obligation of pay~ng tnbu~es to t~e ~ht~f, which is purely voluntary in nature. However, there are continuing debates among the you.nge.r ge~era~10n over tts cont.mUity m the advent of democracy. This paper will discuss the different schools of thought on KuiG chteftamshJp and thereafte1 suggest what possibly could be the most appropriate approach to the debate on Kuki Chieftainship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信