CAD-CAM铣削和3D打印义齿基托树脂弹性模量的评价

Ahmed Zeidan, Ramy Abd El-Rahim, Mohamed R. Helal
{"title":"CAD-CAM铣削和3D打印义齿基托树脂弹性模量的评价","authors":"Ahmed Zeidan, Ramy Abd El-Rahim, Mohamed R. Helal","doi":"10.21608/ajdsm.2021.81731.1209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the elastic modulus between milled, 3D printed and conventional compression moulded denture base resins (DBRs). Materials and methods: Three different types of DBRs were used: milled resin (pre-polymerized PMMA plates) ; a 3D printed resin (photopolymerized resin); and a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) heat cured resin (powder-liquid system). Thirty specimens have been constructed with specific dimensions (65mm x10mm x3mm) and divided into 3 groups (10 for each group) according to the type of DBR, Group I contained the milled DBR specimens, Group II contained 3-dimentional printed DBR specimens, and Group III contained conventional compression moulded DBR specimens. The elastic modulus of the 30 specimens were measured and calculated by universal testing machine using three-point loading test. Results: The elastic modulus of the milled group was significantly higher than that of the other 2 groups (P<0.05), while the elastic modulus of the compression moulded group was significantly greater than that of the 3D printed group (P<0.05). Conclusion: milled DBR show the highest elastic modulus when compared with conventional compression moulded or 3D printed DBRs, while 3D printed DBR shows the lowest elastic modulus.","PeriodicalId":117944,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation For Elastic Modulus Of CAD-CAM Milled And 3D Printed Denture Base Resins\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Zeidan, Ramy Abd El-Rahim, Mohamed R. Helal\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ajdsm.2021.81731.1209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the elastic modulus between milled, 3D printed and conventional compression moulded denture base resins (DBRs). Materials and methods: Three different types of DBRs were used: milled resin (pre-polymerized PMMA plates) ; a 3D printed resin (photopolymerized resin); and a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) heat cured resin (powder-liquid system). Thirty specimens have been constructed with specific dimensions (65mm x10mm x3mm) and divided into 3 groups (10 for each group) according to the type of DBR, Group I contained the milled DBR specimens, Group II contained 3-dimentional printed DBR specimens, and Group III contained conventional compression moulded DBR specimens. The elastic modulus of the 30 specimens were measured and calculated by universal testing machine using three-point loading test. Results: The elastic modulus of the milled group was significantly higher than that of the other 2 groups (P<0.05), while the elastic modulus of the compression moulded group was significantly greater than that of the 3D printed group (P<0.05). Conclusion: milled DBR show the highest elastic modulus when compared with conventional compression moulded or 3D printed DBRs, while 3D printed DBR shows the lowest elastic modulus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ajdsm.2021.81731.1209\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ajdsm.2021.81731.1209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是比较研磨、3D打印和传统压缩成型义齿基托树脂(DBRs)的弹性模量。材料和方法:采用三种不同类型的dbr:研磨树脂(预聚合PMMA板);3D打印树脂(光聚合树脂);以及聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)热固化树脂(粉末-液体体系)。按照特定尺寸(65mm x10mm x3mm)制作标本30个,根据DBR类型分为3组(每组10个),第一组为铣削DBR标本,第二组为三维打印DBR标本,第三组为常规压缩成型DBR标本。采用万能试验机进行三点加载试验,对30个试件的弹性模量进行了测量和计算。结果:磨模组弹性模量显著高于其他2组(P<0.05),压模组弹性模量显著大于3D打印组(P<0.05)。结论:铣削DBR的弹性模量高于常规压模和3D打印DBR,而3D打印DBR的弹性模量最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation For Elastic Modulus Of CAD-CAM Milled And 3D Printed Denture Base Resins
Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the elastic modulus between milled, 3D printed and conventional compression moulded denture base resins (DBRs). Materials and methods: Three different types of DBRs were used: milled resin (pre-polymerized PMMA plates) ; a 3D printed resin (photopolymerized resin); and a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) heat cured resin (powder-liquid system). Thirty specimens have been constructed with specific dimensions (65mm x10mm x3mm) and divided into 3 groups (10 for each group) according to the type of DBR, Group I contained the milled DBR specimens, Group II contained 3-dimentional printed DBR specimens, and Group III contained conventional compression moulded DBR specimens. The elastic modulus of the 30 specimens were measured and calculated by universal testing machine using three-point loading test. Results: The elastic modulus of the milled group was significantly higher than that of the other 2 groups (P<0.05), while the elastic modulus of the compression moulded group was significantly greater than that of the 3D printed group (P<0.05). Conclusion: milled DBR show the highest elastic modulus when compared with conventional compression moulded or 3D printed DBRs, while 3D printed DBR shows the lowest elastic modulus.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信