理论反思:实践研究的基础与范式问题

P. Alderson
{"title":"理论反思:实践研究的基础与范式问题","authors":"P. Alderson","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781447354550.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 1 reviews: social and biomedical influences through the centuries; positivist health research and then problems with it; interpretive research and some associated problems; differences between positivism and interpretivism; realist evaluation compared and contrasted with critical realism and discourse analysis. The detailed example is an evaluation of a community-based integrated care service. The chapter ends with questioning the present unhealthy state of social health research, which undermines the hope that sociology can be generally respected, convincing and useful in helping to resolve serious global problems of health and illness. This prepares for future chapters that show how critical realism draws on the strengths and overcomes the limitations of these paradigms by combining them into larger analysis.","PeriodicalId":438507,"journal":{"name":"Critical Realism for Health and Illness Research","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking theories: the basis of practical research and problems with paradigms\",\"authors\":\"P. Alderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/policypress/9781447354550.003.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chapter 1 reviews: social and biomedical influences through the centuries; positivist health research and then problems with it; interpretive research and some associated problems; differences between positivism and interpretivism; realist evaluation compared and contrasted with critical realism and discourse analysis. The detailed example is an evaluation of a community-based integrated care service. The chapter ends with questioning the present unhealthy state of social health research, which undermines the hope that sociology can be generally respected, convincing and useful in helping to resolve serious global problems of health and illness. This prepares for future chapters that show how critical realism draws on the strengths and overcomes the limitations of these paradigms by combining them into larger analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":438507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Realism for Health and Illness Research\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Realism for Health and Illness Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447354550.003.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Realism for Health and Illness Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447354550.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第一章回顾了几个世纪以来的社会和生物医学影响;实证主义健康研究及其问题;解释学研究及其相关问题实证主义与解释主义的区别现实主义评价与批判现实主义和话语分析相比较。详细的例子是对社区综合护理服务的评估。本章最后对社会卫生研究目前的不健康状况提出了质疑,这破坏了社会学在帮助解决严重的全球健康和疾病问题方面能够得到普遍尊重、令人信服和有用的希望。这为以后的章节做了准备,这些章节将展示批判现实主义如何利用这些范式的优势,并通过将它们结合到更大的分析中来克服它们的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rethinking theories: the basis of practical research and problems with paradigms
Chapter 1 reviews: social and biomedical influences through the centuries; positivist health research and then problems with it; interpretive research and some associated problems; differences between positivism and interpretivism; realist evaluation compared and contrasted with critical realism and discourse analysis. The detailed example is an evaluation of a community-based integrated care service. The chapter ends with questioning the present unhealthy state of social health research, which undermines the hope that sociology can be generally respected, convincing and useful in helping to resolve serious global problems of health and illness. This prepares for future chapters that show how critical realism draws on the strengths and overcomes the limitations of these paradigms by combining them into larger analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信