影响华盛顿特区低成本空气监测网络使用的政策因素分析

Simon Saliby, Alexander Tong, Selin Ciesielski, Patrick Lim, R. Francis
{"title":"影响华盛顿特区低成本空气监测网络使用的政策因素分析","authors":"Simon Saliby, Alexander Tong, Selin Ciesielski, Patrick Lim, R. Francis","doi":"10.1109/SIEDS49339.2020.9106694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six criteria pollutants and monitors attainment to these standards through a system of federally accepted analytical methods (FEMs or FRMs). Due to their cost and technical sophistication, FEM monitoring networks may be good for measuring air pollution at a regional spatial resolution but may not be appropriate for monitoring neighborhood-level resolution. While FEM networks are effective at monitoring regional scale pollution, literature indicates that pollution varies considerably at sub-regional and even neighborhood-or block-level spatial scales. Therefore, while a region may be in attainment with the NAAQS, local communities’ air quality may not be represented by the data collected through the FEM network. In fact, public health trends, uneven distribution of tree canopy, and socioeconomic data indicate that particular communities in Washington, DC may have a high risk for nonattainment despite the District being in compliance with federal measures of air quality. With the overarching goal of mitigating this potential environmental and public health issue, the George Washington University Sustainability living lab project, Fresh Air DC, is working to deploy low-cost high-density air monitoring systems with at least one sensor in each advisory neighborhood council (ANC) throughout the District. In this paper, we formulate the elements of a policy framework that can support the establishment of this system. Our research will involve a comparative analysis between two existing low-cost high-density systems, one deployed in California and brought forth by state legislation, and the Breathe London hyperlocal air quality monitoring network. This comparative analysis will demonstrate the role of effective policy systems in supporting the development and implementation of a low-cost high-density system in DC. Moreover, this analysis demonstrates the role of the proposed policy framework in supporting the new DC Sustainability Plan.","PeriodicalId":331495,"journal":{"name":"2020 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Policy Factors Impacting the Use of Low-Cost Air Monitoring Networks in Washington, D.C.\",\"authors\":\"Simon Saliby, Alexander Tong, Selin Ciesielski, Patrick Lim, R. Francis\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SIEDS49339.2020.9106694\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six criteria pollutants and monitors attainment to these standards through a system of federally accepted analytical methods (FEMs or FRMs). Due to their cost and technical sophistication, FEM monitoring networks may be good for measuring air pollution at a regional spatial resolution but may not be appropriate for monitoring neighborhood-level resolution. While FEM networks are effective at monitoring regional scale pollution, literature indicates that pollution varies considerably at sub-regional and even neighborhood-or block-level spatial scales. Therefore, while a region may be in attainment with the NAAQS, local communities’ air quality may not be represented by the data collected through the FEM network. In fact, public health trends, uneven distribution of tree canopy, and socioeconomic data indicate that particular communities in Washington, DC may have a high risk for nonattainment despite the District being in compliance with federal measures of air quality. With the overarching goal of mitigating this potential environmental and public health issue, the George Washington University Sustainability living lab project, Fresh Air DC, is working to deploy low-cost high-density air monitoring systems with at least one sensor in each advisory neighborhood council (ANC) throughout the District. In this paper, we formulate the elements of a policy framework that can support the establishment of this system. Our research will involve a comparative analysis between two existing low-cost high-density systems, one deployed in California and brought forth by state legislation, and the Breathe London hyperlocal air quality monitoring network. This comparative analysis will demonstrate the role of effective policy systems in supporting the development and implementation of a low-cost high-density system in DC. Moreover, this analysis demonstrates the role of the proposed policy framework in supporting the new DC Sustainability Plan.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS49339.2020.9106694\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS49339.2020.9106694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环境保护署(EPA)为六种标准污染物制定了国家环境空气质量标准(NAAQS),并通过联邦认可的分析方法(fem或FRMs)系统监测这些标准的实现情况。由于其成本和技术的复杂性,有限元监测网络可能有利于测量区域空间分辨率的空气污染,但可能不适合监测邻里水平的分辨率。虽然FEM网络在监测区域尺度污染方面是有效的,但文献表明,在次区域甚至邻里或街区水平的空间尺度上,污染变化很大。因此,虽然一个地区可能达到了NAAQS,但通过FEM网络收集的数据可能无法代表当地社区的空气质量。事实上,公共卫生趋势、树冠分布不均和社会经济数据表明,尽管华盛顿特区符合联邦空气质量措施,但该地区的特定社区可能有很高的不达标风险。为了减轻这种潜在的环境和公共卫生问题,乔治华盛顿大学可持续发展生活实验室项目Fresh Air DC正在努力在整个地区的每个咨询社区委员会(ANC)部署至少一个传感器的低成本高密度空气监测系统。在本文中,我们制定了一个政策框架的要素,可以支持这一制度的建立。我们的研究将涉及对两个现有的低成本高密度系统的比较分析,一个在加州部署并由州立法提出,另一个是呼吸伦敦超本地空气质量监测网络。这种比较分析将证明有效的政策系统在支持发展和实施DC低成本高密度系统方面的作用。此外,该分析还证明了拟议的政策框架在支持新的DC可持续发展计划方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Policy Factors Impacting the Use of Low-Cost Air Monitoring Networks in Washington, D.C.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six criteria pollutants and monitors attainment to these standards through a system of federally accepted analytical methods (FEMs or FRMs). Due to their cost and technical sophistication, FEM monitoring networks may be good for measuring air pollution at a regional spatial resolution but may not be appropriate for monitoring neighborhood-level resolution. While FEM networks are effective at monitoring regional scale pollution, literature indicates that pollution varies considerably at sub-regional and even neighborhood-or block-level spatial scales. Therefore, while a region may be in attainment with the NAAQS, local communities’ air quality may not be represented by the data collected through the FEM network. In fact, public health trends, uneven distribution of tree canopy, and socioeconomic data indicate that particular communities in Washington, DC may have a high risk for nonattainment despite the District being in compliance with federal measures of air quality. With the overarching goal of mitigating this potential environmental and public health issue, the George Washington University Sustainability living lab project, Fresh Air DC, is working to deploy low-cost high-density air monitoring systems with at least one sensor in each advisory neighborhood council (ANC) throughout the District. In this paper, we formulate the elements of a policy framework that can support the establishment of this system. Our research will involve a comparative analysis between two existing low-cost high-density systems, one deployed in California and brought forth by state legislation, and the Breathe London hyperlocal air quality monitoring network. This comparative analysis will demonstrate the role of effective policy systems in supporting the development and implementation of a low-cost high-density system in DC. Moreover, this analysis demonstrates the role of the proposed policy framework in supporting the new DC Sustainability Plan.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信