{"title":"菲利奥克之争的神学方法","authors":"Francis Jickhong Yun","doi":"10.26590/MADANG..25.201606.77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I have created a new field of study, which I named, “The theomathology” which is the field of Theological Mathematics. The dispute over Filioque and its attendant Trinitarian questions have been continuing almost 2,000 years of history, but no one has ever satisfactorily resolved them. Apparently, when theologians or scholars attempt to provide a conclusive resolution to questions involving the Trinity or the Filioque Controversy, expect any satisfactory result no matter how much invested. First of all, in order to understand both the ‘Filioque Controversy and the doctrine of the Trinity, which share the same root, we should take care not to seperate the explanation. We have to seriously observe the historical context back to the Toledo Synod (AD 589), when the word “Filioque” was forcefully adopted into the Creed, although no one understood it or was able to explain it so17). Thus I strongly believe that the word inserted by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.","PeriodicalId":130336,"journal":{"name":"Madang: Journal of Contextual Theology","volume":"46 44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Theomathological Approach to the Filioque Controversy\",\"authors\":\"Francis Jickhong Yun\",\"doi\":\"10.26590/MADANG..25.201606.77\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I have created a new field of study, which I named, “The theomathology” which is the field of Theological Mathematics. The dispute over Filioque and its attendant Trinitarian questions have been continuing almost 2,000 years of history, but no one has ever satisfactorily resolved them. Apparently, when theologians or scholars attempt to provide a conclusive resolution to questions involving the Trinity or the Filioque Controversy, expect any satisfactory result no matter how much invested. First of all, in order to understand both the ‘Filioque Controversy and the doctrine of the Trinity, which share the same root, we should take care not to seperate the explanation. We have to seriously observe the historical context back to the Toledo Synod (AD 589), when the word “Filioque” was forcefully adopted into the Creed, although no one understood it or was able to explain it so17). Thus I strongly believe that the word inserted by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Madang: Journal of Contextual Theology\",\"volume\":\"46 44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Madang: Journal of Contextual Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26590/MADANG..25.201606.77\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Madang: Journal of Contextual Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26590/MADANG..25.201606.77","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Theomathological Approach to the Filioque Controversy
I have created a new field of study, which I named, “The theomathology” which is the field of Theological Mathematics. The dispute over Filioque and its attendant Trinitarian questions have been continuing almost 2,000 years of history, but no one has ever satisfactorily resolved them. Apparently, when theologians or scholars attempt to provide a conclusive resolution to questions involving the Trinity or the Filioque Controversy, expect any satisfactory result no matter how much invested. First of all, in order to understand both the ‘Filioque Controversy and the doctrine of the Trinity, which share the same root, we should take care not to seperate the explanation. We have to seriously observe the historical context back to the Toledo Synod (AD 589), when the word “Filioque” was forcefully adopted into the Creed, although no one understood it or was able to explain it so17). Thus I strongly believe that the word inserted by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.