刺激数对不同语音退化用户感知的影响。众包案例研究

Rafael Zequeira Jiménez, Gabriel Mittag, S. Möller
{"title":"刺激数对不同语音退化用户感知的影响。众包案例研究","authors":"Rafael Zequeira Jiménez, Gabriel Mittag, S. Möller","doi":"10.1109/ISM.2018.00-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crowdsourcing (CS) has established as a powerful tool to collect human input for data acquisition and labeling. However, it remains the question about the validity of the data collected in a CS platform. Sometimes, the users work carelessly or they try to tweak the system to maximize their profits. This paper reports on whether the number of speech stimuli presented to the listeners has an impact on the user perception of certain degradation conditions applied to the speech signal. To this end, a crowdsourcing study has been conducted with 209 listeners that were divided in three non-overlapping user groups, each of which was presented with tasks containing a different number of stimuli: 10, 20, or 40. Listeners were asked to rate speech stimuli with respect to their overall quality and the ratings were collected on a 5-point scale in accordance with ITU-T Rec. P.800. Workers assessed the speech stimuli of the database 501 from ITU-T Rec. P.863. Additionally, the influence of certain speech signal characteristics, such as interruptions and bandwidth, on the quality perception of the workers was investigated.","PeriodicalId":308698,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Number of Stimuli on Users Perception of Different Speech Degradations. A Crowdsourcing Case Study\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Zequeira Jiménez, Gabriel Mittag, S. Möller\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISM.2018.00-16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Crowdsourcing (CS) has established as a powerful tool to collect human input for data acquisition and labeling. However, it remains the question about the validity of the data collected in a CS platform. Sometimes, the users work carelessly or they try to tweak the system to maximize their profits. This paper reports on whether the number of speech stimuli presented to the listeners has an impact on the user perception of certain degradation conditions applied to the speech signal. To this end, a crowdsourcing study has been conducted with 209 listeners that were divided in three non-overlapping user groups, each of which was presented with tasks containing a different number of stimuli: 10, 20, or 40. Listeners were asked to rate speech stimuli with respect to their overall quality and the ratings were collected on a 5-point scale in accordance with ITU-T Rec. P.800. Workers assessed the speech stimuli of the database 501 from ITU-T Rec. P.863. Additionally, the influence of certain speech signal characteristics, such as interruptions and bandwidth, on the quality perception of the workers was investigated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM)\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISM.2018.00-16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISM.2018.00-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

众包(CS)已成为收集人力输入以进行数据采集和标记的强大工具。然而,CS平台收集的数据的有效性仍然是一个问题。有时,用户工作不小心,或者他们试图调整系统,以最大化他们的利益。本文报道了呈现给听者的语音刺激的数量是否会影响用户对应用于语音信号的某些退化条件的感知。为此,我们对209名听众进行了一项众包研究,他们被分为三个不重叠的用户组,每个用户组的任务包含不同数量的刺激:10个、20个或40个。听众被要求对语音刺激的整体质量进行评分,并按照ITU-T Rec. P.800的标准以5分制收集评分。工作人员评估了ITU-T Rec. P.863数据库501的语音刺激。此外,研究了某些语音信号特征(如中断和带宽)对工作人员质量感知的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Number of Stimuli on Users Perception of Different Speech Degradations. A Crowdsourcing Case Study
Crowdsourcing (CS) has established as a powerful tool to collect human input for data acquisition and labeling. However, it remains the question about the validity of the data collected in a CS platform. Sometimes, the users work carelessly or they try to tweak the system to maximize their profits. This paper reports on whether the number of speech stimuli presented to the listeners has an impact on the user perception of certain degradation conditions applied to the speech signal. To this end, a crowdsourcing study has been conducted with 209 listeners that were divided in three non-overlapping user groups, each of which was presented with tasks containing a different number of stimuli: 10, 20, or 40. Listeners were asked to rate speech stimuli with respect to their overall quality and the ratings were collected on a 5-point scale in accordance with ITU-T Rec. P.800. Workers assessed the speech stimuli of the database 501 from ITU-T Rec. P.863. Additionally, the influence of certain speech signal characteristics, such as interruptions and bandwidth, on the quality perception of the workers was investigated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信