学习和比较免费的电子学习平台

M. Ouadoud, M. Chkouri, Amel Nejjari, Kamal Eddine El Kadiri
{"title":"学习和比较免费的电子学习平台","authors":"M. Ouadoud, M. Chkouri, Amel Nejjari, Kamal Eddine El Kadiri","doi":"10.1109/CIST.2016.7804953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"E-learning platforms are constantly changing; they have transformed the everyday life of teachers and students. An e-learning platforms study, from a methodical, systemic approach that identifies the dimensions, specifications and the essential criteria for the evaluation of these platforms is necessary. In this paper, we propose an analytical study of free e-learning platforms. Four platforms have been selected according to requested criteria filter among the 600 platforms listed in the THOT CURSUS directory. Subsequently, we make a comparative study of these platforms. On the one hand, we would like to measure the degree of adequacy between technological opportunities they offer and the pedagogical presuppositions of training. On the other hand, for clarifying and supporting the users in their choice of the most suitable platform for their needs so that they can benefit to the maximum of potential offered by technologies in pedagogy, and approach the problematic of the platform choice for a better pedagogy.","PeriodicalId":196827,"journal":{"name":"2016 4th IEEE International Colloquium on Information Science and Technology (CiSt)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Studying and comparing the free e-learning platforms\",\"authors\":\"M. Ouadoud, M. Chkouri, Amel Nejjari, Kamal Eddine El Kadiri\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CIST.2016.7804953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"E-learning platforms are constantly changing; they have transformed the everyday life of teachers and students. An e-learning platforms study, from a methodical, systemic approach that identifies the dimensions, specifications and the essential criteria for the evaluation of these platforms is necessary. In this paper, we propose an analytical study of free e-learning platforms. Four platforms have been selected according to requested criteria filter among the 600 platforms listed in the THOT CURSUS directory. Subsequently, we make a comparative study of these platforms. On the one hand, we would like to measure the degree of adequacy between technological opportunities they offer and the pedagogical presuppositions of training. On the other hand, for clarifying and supporting the users in their choice of the most suitable platform for their needs so that they can benefit to the maximum of potential offered by technologies in pedagogy, and approach the problematic of the platform choice for a better pedagogy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 4th IEEE International Colloquium on Information Science and Technology (CiSt)\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 4th IEEE International Colloquium on Information Science and Technology (CiSt)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIST.2016.7804953\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 4th IEEE International Colloquium on Information Science and Technology (CiSt)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIST.2016.7804953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

摘要

电子学习平台在不断变化;他们改变了老师和学生的日常生活。有必要从系统、系统的方法对电子学习平台进行研究,确定评估这些平台的维度、规范和基本标准。在本文中,我们提出了一个免费电子学习平台的分析研究。在THOT CURSUS目录中列出的600个平台中,根据要求的标准筛选了四个平台。随后,我们对这些平台进行了比较研究。一方面,我们希望衡量它们提供的技术机会与培训的教学前提之间的适当程度。另一方面,为了澄清和支持用户选择最适合他们需求的平台,使他们能够最大限度地受益于技术在教育学中提供的潜力,并解决平台选择的问题,以实现更好的教育学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Studying and comparing the free e-learning platforms
E-learning platforms are constantly changing; they have transformed the everyday life of teachers and students. An e-learning platforms study, from a methodical, systemic approach that identifies the dimensions, specifications and the essential criteria for the evaluation of these platforms is necessary. In this paper, we propose an analytical study of free e-learning platforms. Four platforms have been selected according to requested criteria filter among the 600 platforms listed in the THOT CURSUS directory. Subsequently, we make a comparative study of these platforms. On the one hand, we would like to measure the degree of adequacy between technological opportunities they offer and the pedagogical presuppositions of training. On the other hand, for clarifying and supporting the users in their choice of the most suitable platform for their needs so that they can benefit to the maximum of potential offered by technologies in pedagogy, and approach the problematic of the platform choice for a better pedagogy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信