基于脑电P300范式的多发性硬化症认知功能障碍检测

J. V. Schependom, M. D'hooge, Krista Cleynhens, M. D'hooghe, J. Keyser, G. Nagels
{"title":"基于脑电P300范式的多发性硬化症认知功能障碍检测","authors":"J. V. Schependom, M. D'hooge, Krista Cleynhens, M. D'hooghe, J. Keyser, G. Nagels","doi":"10.1109/PRNI.2013.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cognitive impairment affects half of the multiple sclerosis (MS) patient population and is an important factor of quality of life. Cognitive impairment is, however, difficult to detect. Apart from the traditional features used in P300 experiments (e.g. amplitude and latency at different electrodes), we want to investigate the value of network-features on the classification of MS patients as cognitively intact or impaired. We included 305 MS patients, recruited at the National MS Center Melsbroek (Belgium). About half of them was denoted cognitively impaired (143). We divided this patient group in a training set (on which we used 10-fold cross validation) and an independent test set. Results are reported on this last group to increase the generalizability. We found the correlations linking electrodes from one hemisphere with the other significantly different between the two groups MS patients. Especially in the parietal region this difference was very significant (1.5E-12). Using a simple cutoff on this variable, lead to a Percentage Correctly Classified (PCC) of 0.70 and an Area Under Curve (AUC) of the Receiver Operator Curve (ROC) of 0.76. The network parameters that were calculated showed a comparable result for the total number of edges included in the network. Combining these features in a logistic regression model, artificial neural networks or Naive Bayes resulted in a PCC's of 0.68-0.70. These results support the recent suggestion that cognitive dysfunction in MS is caused by a disconnection mechanism in the cerebellum. We have obtained these results applying graph theoretical analyses on EEG data instead of the more common fMRI-analyses. The classification accuracy obtained is, however, not yet sufficient for application in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":144007,"journal":{"name":"2013 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging","volume":"378 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of Cognitive Impairment in MS Based on an EEG P300 Paradigm\",\"authors\":\"J. V. Schependom, M. D'hooge, Krista Cleynhens, M. D'hooghe, J. Keyser, G. Nagels\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PRNI.2013.38\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cognitive impairment affects half of the multiple sclerosis (MS) patient population and is an important factor of quality of life. Cognitive impairment is, however, difficult to detect. Apart from the traditional features used in P300 experiments (e.g. amplitude and latency at different electrodes), we want to investigate the value of network-features on the classification of MS patients as cognitively intact or impaired. We included 305 MS patients, recruited at the National MS Center Melsbroek (Belgium). About half of them was denoted cognitively impaired (143). We divided this patient group in a training set (on which we used 10-fold cross validation) and an independent test set. Results are reported on this last group to increase the generalizability. We found the correlations linking electrodes from one hemisphere with the other significantly different between the two groups MS patients. Especially in the parietal region this difference was very significant (1.5E-12). Using a simple cutoff on this variable, lead to a Percentage Correctly Classified (PCC) of 0.70 and an Area Under Curve (AUC) of the Receiver Operator Curve (ROC) of 0.76. The network parameters that were calculated showed a comparable result for the total number of edges included in the network. Combining these features in a logistic regression model, artificial neural networks or Naive Bayes resulted in a PCC's of 0.68-0.70. These results support the recent suggestion that cognitive dysfunction in MS is caused by a disconnection mechanism in the cerebellum. We have obtained these results applying graph theoretical analyses on EEG data instead of the more common fMRI-analyses. The classification accuracy obtained is, however, not yet sufficient for application in clinical practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":144007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging\",\"volume\":\"378 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PRNI.2013.38\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PRNI.2013.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

认知障碍影响了一半的多发性硬化症(MS)患者,是影响生活质量的一个重要因素。然而,认知障碍很难检测出来。除了P300实验中使用的传统特征(如不同电极的振幅和潜伏期)外,我们还想研究网络特征对MS患者认知完好或受损分类的价值。我们纳入了305名来自比利时Melsbroek国家多发性硬化症中心的患者。其中大约一半的人被认为认知受损(143人)。我们将该患者组分为训练集(我们使用10倍交叉验证)和独立测试集。报告最后一组的结果,以增加概括性。我们发现,在两组多发性硬化症患者中,连接一个半球和另一个半球电极的相关性有显著差异。尤其是在顶叶区域,这种差异非常显著(1.5E-12)。在这个变量上使用一个简单的截止,导致正确分类的百分比(PCC)为0.70,接受者操作曲线(ROC)的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.76。计算的网络参数显示了网络中包含的边缘总数的可比结果。在逻辑回归模型中结合这些特征,人工神经网络或朴素贝叶斯得出的PCC为0.68-0.70。这些结果支持了最近的一项建议,即MS的认知功能障碍是由小脑的断开机制引起的。我们用图理论分析脑电图数据,而不是更常见的fmri分析,得到了这些结果。然而,所获得的分类精度尚不足以应用于临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detection of Cognitive Impairment in MS Based on an EEG P300 Paradigm
Cognitive impairment affects half of the multiple sclerosis (MS) patient population and is an important factor of quality of life. Cognitive impairment is, however, difficult to detect. Apart from the traditional features used in P300 experiments (e.g. amplitude and latency at different electrodes), we want to investigate the value of network-features on the classification of MS patients as cognitively intact or impaired. We included 305 MS patients, recruited at the National MS Center Melsbroek (Belgium). About half of them was denoted cognitively impaired (143). We divided this patient group in a training set (on which we used 10-fold cross validation) and an independent test set. Results are reported on this last group to increase the generalizability. We found the correlations linking electrodes from one hemisphere with the other significantly different between the two groups MS patients. Especially in the parietal region this difference was very significant (1.5E-12). Using a simple cutoff on this variable, lead to a Percentage Correctly Classified (PCC) of 0.70 and an Area Under Curve (AUC) of the Receiver Operator Curve (ROC) of 0.76. The network parameters that were calculated showed a comparable result for the total number of edges included in the network. Combining these features in a logistic regression model, artificial neural networks or Naive Bayes resulted in a PCC's of 0.68-0.70. These results support the recent suggestion that cognitive dysfunction in MS is caused by a disconnection mechanism in the cerebellum. We have obtained these results applying graph theoretical analyses on EEG data instead of the more common fMRI-analyses. The classification accuracy obtained is, however, not yet sufficient for application in clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信