认知无线电协同频谱感知方法的比较

L. Bixio, M. Ottonello, M. Raffetto, C. Regazzoni, C. Armani
{"title":"认知无线电协同频谱感知方法的比较","authors":"L. Bixio, M. Ottonello, M. Raffetto, C. Regazzoni, C. Armani","doi":"10.1109/CIP.2010.5604202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a comparison among different cooperative spectrum sensing approaches is provided. It is assumed that the secondary terminals autonomously perform local spectrum sensing and forward their decision to a fusion center. It combines the received data to obtain the global decision, i.e. the presence or the absence of the primary user in the monitored environment. In particular, three fusion rules, i.e. OR, AND and optimal, are compared in terms of required processing capabilities at the fusion center and at the secondary terminals, and required control channel capacity. Numerical simulations in a practical heavy multipath environment are provided to compared the performances of the considered approaches.","PeriodicalId":171474,"journal":{"name":"2010 2nd International Workshop on Cognitive Information Processing","volume":"203 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison among cooperative spectrum sensing approaches for cognitive radios\",\"authors\":\"L. Bixio, M. Ottonello, M. Raffetto, C. Regazzoni, C. Armani\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CIP.2010.5604202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, a comparison among different cooperative spectrum sensing approaches is provided. It is assumed that the secondary terminals autonomously perform local spectrum sensing and forward their decision to a fusion center. It combines the received data to obtain the global decision, i.e. the presence or the absence of the primary user in the monitored environment. In particular, three fusion rules, i.e. OR, AND and optimal, are compared in terms of required processing capabilities at the fusion center and at the secondary terminals, and required control channel capacity. Numerical simulations in a practical heavy multipath environment are provided to compared the performances of the considered approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":171474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 2nd International Workshop on Cognitive Information Processing\",\"volume\":\"203 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 2nd International Workshop on Cognitive Information Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIP.2010.5604202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 2nd International Workshop on Cognitive Information Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIP.2010.5604202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本文对不同的协同频谱感知方法进行了比较。假设二次终端自主地进行局部频谱感知,并将其决策转发给融合中心。它结合接收到的数据来获得全局决策,即被监视环境中主用户的存在与否。特别地,从融合中心和二次终端所需的处理能力以及所需的控制通道容量方面,比较了OR、AND和最优三种融合规则。在一个实际的重多径环境中进行了数值模拟,比较了所考虑的方法的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison among cooperative spectrum sensing approaches for cognitive radios
In this paper, a comparison among different cooperative spectrum sensing approaches is provided. It is assumed that the secondary terminals autonomously perform local spectrum sensing and forward their decision to a fusion center. It combines the received data to obtain the global decision, i.e. the presence or the absence of the primary user in the monitored environment. In particular, three fusion rules, i.e. OR, AND and optimal, are compared in terms of required processing capabilities at the fusion center and at the secondary terminals, and required control channel capacity. Numerical simulations in a practical heavy multipath environment are provided to compared the performances of the considered approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信