政治、社区、民粹主义和自由主义中的友谊:对诺丁和史密斯的回应

A. Roberts
{"title":"政治、社区、民粹主义和自由主义中的友谊:对诺丁和史密斯的回应","authors":"A. Roberts","doi":"10.1080/23269995.2018.1520004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis response looks first at the authors’ suggestion that friendship is a useful concept for understanding and shaping politics and agrees that it is commonly used, though its meaning is commonly understood as different from the one proposed by the authors. Secondly, it focuses on their argument that friendship could serve as ‘a politics beyond community’, asking if friendship is not more easily understood as a sub-set of community or the means to building a community of the like-minded. Thirdly, it comments on the links of community and populism, noting that the populism is a recurring phenomenon and not exclusively rooted in European thought. Lastly, while agreeing that the proposed ethos is welcome, it asks how much it differs from other ideas, notably liberal, universal values that are built on the idea of individual rights, including a belief in tolerance, moderation and respect for political views that differ from one’s own.This is a reply to:Nordin, A. H. M. and Smith, G. M. 2018. “Friendsh...","PeriodicalId":213164,"journal":{"name":"Cultivating New Post-secular Political Space","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Friendship in politics, community, populism and liberalism: a response to Nordin and Smith\",\"authors\":\"A. Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23269995.2018.1520004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThis response looks first at the authors’ suggestion that friendship is a useful concept for understanding and shaping politics and agrees that it is commonly used, though its meaning is commonly understood as different from the one proposed by the authors. Secondly, it focuses on their argument that friendship could serve as ‘a politics beyond community’, asking if friendship is not more easily understood as a sub-set of community or the means to building a community of the like-minded. Thirdly, it comments on the links of community and populism, noting that the populism is a recurring phenomenon and not exclusively rooted in European thought. Lastly, while agreeing that the proposed ethos is welcome, it asks how much it differs from other ideas, notably liberal, universal values that are built on the idea of individual rights, including a belief in tolerance, moderation and respect for political views that differ from one’s own.This is a reply to:Nordin, A. H. M. and Smith, G. M. 2018. “Friendsh...\",\"PeriodicalId\":213164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultivating New Post-secular Political Space\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultivating New Post-secular Political Space\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2018.1520004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultivating New Post-secular Political Space","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2018.1520004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文首先对作者提出的“友谊是理解和塑造政治的有用概念”这一观点进行了探讨,并同意“友谊”这一概念被广泛使用,尽管其含义通常被理解为与作者提出的含义不同。其次,关注他们关于友谊可以作为“一种超越社区的政治”的论点,询问友谊是否更容易理解为社区的子集或建立志同道合的社区的手段。第三,评论了共同体与民粹主义的联系,指出民粹主义是一种反复出现的现象,并非完全植根于欧洲思想。最后,虽然同意所提议的精神是受欢迎的,但它问它与其他思想有多大不同,特别是建立在个人权利思想基础上的自由主义、普世价值观,包括对宽容、温和和尊重与自己不同的政治观点的信仰。这是对Nordin, a.h.m. and Smith, g.m. 2018的回复。“Friendsh…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Friendship in politics, community, populism and liberalism: a response to Nordin and Smith
ABSTRACTThis response looks first at the authors’ suggestion that friendship is a useful concept for understanding and shaping politics and agrees that it is commonly used, though its meaning is commonly understood as different from the one proposed by the authors. Secondly, it focuses on their argument that friendship could serve as ‘a politics beyond community’, asking if friendship is not more easily understood as a sub-set of community or the means to building a community of the like-minded. Thirdly, it comments on the links of community and populism, noting that the populism is a recurring phenomenon and not exclusively rooted in European thought. Lastly, while agreeing that the proposed ethos is welcome, it asks how much it differs from other ideas, notably liberal, universal values that are built on the idea of individual rights, including a belief in tolerance, moderation and respect for political views that differ from one’s own.This is a reply to:Nordin, A. H. M. and Smith, G. M. 2018. “Friendsh...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信