Sarah Weissman, S. Ayhan, Joshua Bradley, Jimmy J. Lin
{"title":"识别维基百科中重复和矛盾的信息","authors":"Sarah Weissman, S. Ayhan, Joshua Bradley, Jimmy J. Lin","doi":"10.1145/2756406.2756947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we identify sentences in Wikipedia articles that are either identical or highly similar by applying techniques for near-duplicate detection of web pages. This is accomplished with a MapReduce implementation of minhash to identify sentences with high Jaccard similarity, followed by a pass to generate sentence clusters. Based on manual examination, we discovered that these clusters can be categorized into six different types: templates, identical sentences, copyediting, factual drift, references, and other. Two of these categories are particularly interesting: identical sentences quantify the extent to which content in Wikipedia is copied and pasted, and near-duplicate sentences that state contradictory facts point to quality issues in Wikipedia.","PeriodicalId":256118,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 15th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Duplicate and Contradictory Information in Wikipedia\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Weissman, S. Ayhan, Joshua Bradley, Jimmy J. Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2756406.2756947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we identify sentences in Wikipedia articles that are either identical or highly similar by applying techniques for near-duplicate detection of web pages. This is accomplished with a MapReduce implementation of minhash to identify sentences with high Jaccard similarity, followed by a pass to generate sentence clusters. Based on manual examination, we discovered that these clusters can be categorized into six different types: templates, identical sentences, copyediting, factual drift, references, and other. Two of these categories are particularly interesting: identical sentences quantify the extent to which content in Wikipedia is copied and pasted, and near-duplicate sentences that state contradictory facts point to quality issues in Wikipedia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 15th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 15th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2756406.2756947\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 15th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2756406.2756947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Identifying Duplicate and Contradictory Information in Wikipedia
In this paper, we identify sentences in Wikipedia articles that are either identical or highly similar by applying techniques for near-duplicate detection of web pages. This is accomplished with a MapReduce implementation of minhash to identify sentences with high Jaccard similarity, followed by a pass to generate sentence clusters. Based on manual examination, we discovered that these clusters can be categorized into six different types: templates, identical sentences, copyediting, factual drift, references, and other. Two of these categories are particularly interesting: identical sentences quantify the extent to which content in Wikipedia is copied and pasted, and near-duplicate sentences that state contradictory facts point to quality issues in Wikipedia.