{"title":"葡萄牙信息社会与图书馆评价转型:元评价模型与框架(1970-2013)","authors":"L. Pinto, O. PaulA.","doi":"10.18352/LQ.8264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The need for greater understanding of assessment practices and models highlights a deficit of an up-to-date meta-evaluation model, whilst articulating with new phases in Information Society (IS) development. This paper aims to discuss the meta-evaluation model and frameworks that were created to explain the relations between IS transitions and the development of library performance evaluation models in Portugal (1970–2013). The research is based on a qualitative methodology supported by a combination of literature review with the construction and application of conceptual models and frameworks. The meta-evaluation model of the impact of transitions on library performance evaluation provides an adequate representation and explanation of relationships between IS transitions and library performance evaluation models. The C LPE T ( C ategorizing L ibrary P erformance E valuation T ypologies) Matrix, as well as the relational framework that was developed proved to be useful analytical tools. This paper highlights the current transition of performance models into a more holistic performance management, clarifying that diverse uses and components of performance are strongly linked to IS dynamics. It will also enable readers to discuss the impact of meta-evaluation models as a strong instrument to support the challenges of visions, strategies and best practices shifted over time.","PeriodicalId":357594,"journal":{"name":"The Liber Quarterly","volume":"348 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information Society and Library Evaluation Transitions in Portugal: A Meta-evaluation Model and Frameworks (1970–2013)\",\"authors\":\"L. Pinto, O. PaulA.\",\"doi\":\"10.18352/LQ.8264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The need for greater understanding of assessment practices and models highlights a deficit of an up-to-date meta-evaluation model, whilst articulating with new phases in Information Society (IS) development. This paper aims to discuss the meta-evaluation model and frameworks that were created to explain the relations between IS transitions and the development of library performance evaluation models in Portugal (1970–2013). The research is based on a qualitative methodology supported by a combination of literature review with the construction and application of conceptual models and frameworks. The meta-evaluation model of the impact of transitions on library performance evaluation provides an adequate representation and explanation of relationships between IS transitions and library performance evaluation models. The C LPE T ( C ategorizing L ibrary P erformance E valuation T ypologies) Matrix, as well as the relational framework that was developed proved to be useful analytical tools. This paper highlights the current transition of performance models into a more holistic performance management, clarifying that diverse uses and components of performance are strongly linked to IS dynamics. It will also enable readers to discuss the impact of meta-evaluation models as a strong instrument to support the challenges of visions, strategies and best practices shifted over time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":357594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Liber Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"348 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Liber Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18352/LQ.8264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Liber Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18352/LQ.8264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
需要更好地理解评估实践和模型,这突出了最新元评估模型的缺陷,同时与信息社会(IS)发展的新阶段相结合。本文旨在讨论元评估模型和框架,这些模型和框架是为了解释葡萄牙(1970-2013)IS转型与图书馆绩效评估模型发展之间的关系而创建的。本研究以定性研究方法为基础,结合文献回顾与概念模型和框架的建构与应用。转型对图书馆绩效评价影响的元评价模型对信息系统转型与图书馆绩效评价模型之间的关系提供了充分的表征和解释。C - LPE - T (C分类-库-性能-评估-拓扑)矩阵,以及已开发的关系框架被证明是有用的分析工具。本文强调了目前绩效模型向更全面的绩效管理的转变,阐明了绩效的不同用途和组成部分与IS动态密切相关。它还将使读者能够讨论元评估模型作为一种强有力的工具的影响,以支持随着时间的推移而变化的愿景、战略和最佳实践的挑战。
Information Society and Library Evaluation Transitions in Portugal: A Meta-evaluation Model and Frameworks (1970–2013)
The need for greater understanding of assessment practices and models highlights a deficit of an up-to-date meta-evaluation model, whilst articulating with new phases in Information Society (IS) development. This paper aims to discuss the meta-evaluation model and frameworks that were created to explain the relations between IS transitions and the development of library performance evaluation models in Portugal (1970–2013). The research is based on a qualitative methodology supported by a combination of literature review with the construction and application of conceptual models and frameworks. The meta-evaluation model of the impact of transitions on library performance evaluation provides an adequate representation and explanation of relationships between IS transitions and library performance evaluation models. The C LPE T ( C ategorizing L ibrary P erformance E valuation T ypologies) Matrix, as well as the relational framework that was developed proved to be useful analytical tools. This paper highlights the current transition of performance models into a more holistic performance management, clarifying that diverse uses and components of performance are strongly linked to IS dynamics. It will also enable readers to discuss the impact of meta-evaluation models as a strong instrument to support the challenges of visions, strategies and best practices shifted over time.