B074:一种基于召回抗原的免疫调节生物制剂效价测定方法,可以区分应答者和无应答者

M. Delcommenne, E. Kleiman, Wushouer Ouerkaxi, P. Daftarian
{"title":"B074:一种基于召回抗原的免疫调节生物制剂效价测定方法,可以区分应答者和无应答者","authors":"M. Delcommenne, E. Kleiman, Wushouer Ouerkaxi, P. Daftarian","doi":"10.1158/2326-6074.CRICIMTEATIAACR18-B074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The surge of therapeutic regimens involving immune checkpoint antagonists and co-stimulatory pathways (ACP) antagonists used as single agents or in combination necessitates better functional screening assays. In vitro functional screening assays need to be non-invasive and high throughput. The recall antigen assay is arguably the one that, in an antigen specific controlled system, directly assesses the activity of potential immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) candidates, in a relatively physiologically relevant manner. The recall antigen assay has been often used in the past to prove the potency of ICI or ACP as indicated in publications and submissions to regulatory bodies. We have conducted a thorough optimization combined with modifications to the recall antigen assay to enable the need for a more effective and efficient assay.Our recall antigen assay has been optimized across multiple parameters including donor selection based on expression of co-inhibitory/co-stimulatory molecules. This facilitates the selection of the right donor for the right candidate. We have optimized both stimulation and readout components to enhance signal to noise ratio. For example, we reduced the duration of in vitro antigen specific CD8+ T-cell clonotype expansion from 2 weeks to 5 to 7 days. To maximize the direct readout, we have used an MHC Tetramer guided analysis, using a cocktail of MHC tetramers made with stimulating peptides. To further empower the tetramer assay with functionality, we also have co-stained tetramer positive cells with activation markers. Finally, we verified the assay using various activity-confirmed ICIs and controls. The assay uses characterized PBMCs stimulated with a pool of peptides with positive and negative treatments (e.g., PD-1 blockades and IgG4) and “test samples,” which are the candidates to be tested. Depending on the donor’s recall responses, a typical assay results in two to 6-fold increase of the antigen specific MHC tetramer positive population. Furthermore, after developing this recall antigen assay, we validated it by performing the assay in different laboratories, using different reagents lots, different instrumentations, and different operators. Recall antigen assay data indicated that not all donors respond to approved immune checkpoint blockades. Healthy donors stimulated with anti CD3 or cytokine cocktails varied showed a wide a wide variability of immune checkpoint molecules (ICM) cell surface levels. Further studies using characterized PBMCs in our recall antigen potency assay revealed that the expression of immune checkpoint molecules may contribute in unresponsiveness to a given ICI. In conclusion, we have developed an improved in vitro recall antigen potency assay for immunomodulatory biologics functional screening including ICIs and APCs. Furthermore, we observed that in our studies this potency assay divides hosts into responders and nonresponders. Interestingly, we also showed significant variation of persons’ PBMC responses to ICIs, which may be related to their inherent expression levels of immune checkpoint molecules. We intend to confirm this finding with further studies using well-annotated clinical samples. Citation Format: Marc Delcommenne, Eden Kleiman, Wushouer Ouerkaxi, Pirouz Daftarian. A recall antigen-based potency assay for immunomodulatory biologics that could discriminate responders from nonresponders [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fourth CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; Sept 30-Oct 3, 2018; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2019;7(2 Suppl):Abstract nr B074.","PeriodicalId":433681,"journal":{"name":"Mutational Analysis and Predicting Response to Immunotherapy","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract B074: A recall antigen-based potency assay for immunomodulatory biologics that could discriminate responders from nonresponders\",\"authors\":\"M. Delcommenne, E. Kleiman, Wushouer Ouerkaxi, P. Daftarian\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/2326-6074.CRICIMTEATIAACR18-B074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The surge of therapeutic regimens involving immune checkpoint antagonists and co-stimulatory pathways (ACP) antagonists used as single agents or in combination necessitates better functional screening assays. In vitro functional screening assays need to be non-invasive and high throughput. The recall antigen assay is arguably the one that, in an antigen specific controlled system, directly assesses the activity of potential immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) candidates, in a relatively physiologically relevant manner. The recall antigen assay has been often used in the past to prove the potency of ICI or ACP as indicated in publications and submissions to regulatory bodies. We have conducted a thorough optimization combined with modifications to the recall antigen assay to enable the need for a more effective and efficient assay.Our recall antigen assay has been optimized across multiple parameters including donor selection based on expression of co-inhibitory/co-stimulatory molecules. This facilitates the selection of the right donor for the right candidate. We have optimized both stimulation and readout components to enhance signal to noise ratio. For example, we reduced the duration of in vitro antigen specific CD8+ T-cell clonotype expansion from 2 weeks to 5 to 7 days. To maximize the direct readout, we have used an MHC Tetramer guided analysis, using a cocktail of MHC tetramers made with stimulating peptides. To further empower the tetramer assay with functionality, we also have co-stained tetramer positive cells with activation markers. Finally, we verified the assay using various activity-confirmed ICIs and controls. The assay uses characterized PBMCs stimulated with a pool of peptides with positive and negative treatments (e.g., PD-1 blockades and IgG4) and “test samples,” which are the candidates to be tested. Depending on the donor’s recall responses, a typical assay results in two to 6-fold increase of the antigen specific MHC tetramer positive population. Furthermore, after developing this recall antigen assay, we validated it by performing the assay in different laboratories, using different reagents lots, different instrumentations, and different operators. Recall antigen assay data indicated that not all donors respond to approved immune checkpoint blockades. Healthy donors stimulated with anti CD3 or cytokine cocktails varied showed a wide a wide variability of immune checkpoint molecules (ICM) cell surface levels. Further studies using characterized PBMCs in our recall antigen potency assay revealed that the expression of immune checkpoint molecules may contribute in unresponsiveness to a given ICI. In conclusion, we have developed an improved in vitro recall antigen potency assay for immunomodulatory biologics functional screening including ICIs and APCs. Furthermore, we observed that in our studies this potency assay divides hosts into responders and nonresponders. Interestingly, we also showed significant variation of persons’ PBMC responses to ICIs, which may be related to their inherent expression levels of immune checkpoint molecules. We intend to confirm this finding with further studies using well-annotated clinical samples. Citation Format: Marc Delcommenne, Eden Kleiman, Wushouer Ouerkaxi, Pirouz Daftarian. A recall antigen-based potency assay for immunomodulatory biologics that could discriminate responders from nonresponders [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fourth CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; Sept 30-Oct 3, 2018; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2019;7(2 Suppl):Abstract nr B074.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mutational Analysis and Predicting Response to Immunotherapy\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mutational Analysis and Predicting Response to Immunotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6074.CRICIMTEATIAACR18-B074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutational Analysis and Predicting Response to Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6074.CRICIMTEATIAACR18-B074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

免疫检查点拮抗剂和共刺激途径(ACP)拮抗剂作为单一药物或联合使用的治疗方案的激增,需要更好的功能筛选分析。体外功能筛选试验需要非侵入性和高通量。召回抗原试验可以说是在抗原特异性控制系统中,以相对生理相关的方式直接评估潜在免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)候选物的活性。召回抗原测定在过去经常用于证明ICI或ACP的效力,如出版物和提交给监管机构所示。我们进行了彻底的优化,并对召回抗原测定进行了修改,以实现更有效和高效的测定。我们的召回抗原试验已经在多个参数上进行了优化,包括基于共抑制/共刺激分子表达的供体选择。这有助于为合适的候选人选择合适的供体。我们优化了激励和读出组件,以提高信噪比。例如,我们将体外抗原特异性CD8+ t细胞克隆扩增的持续时间从2周减少到5至7天。为了最大化直接读数,我们使用MHC四聚体引导分析,使用由刺激肽制成的MHC四聚体鸡尾酒。为了进一步增强四聚体检测的功能,我们还用激活标记物对四聚体阳性细胞进行了共染色。最后,我们使用各种活性确认的ICIs和对照验证了该分析。该检测方法使用经过阳性和阴性处理(例如,PD-1阻断剂和IgG4)的肽池和“测试样品”刺激的特征pbmc,这些样品是待测试的候选物。根据供体的回忆反应,典型的测定结果抗原特异性MHC四聚体阳性人群增加2至6倍。此外,在开发了这种召回抗原测定法之后,我们通过在不同的实验室、使用不同的试剂批次、不同的仪器和不同的操作员进行测定来验证它。回忆抗原测定数据表明,并非所有供体对批准的免疫检查点阻断反应。受抗CD3或细胞因子鸡尾酒刺激的健康供体表现出免疫检查点分子(ICM)细胞表面水平的广泛变异性。在我们的回忆抗原效价测定中,使用表征pbmc的进一步研究表明,免疫检查点分子的表达可能导致对给定ICI的无反应。总之,我们开发了一种改进的体外召回抗原效价法,用于免疫调节生物制剂的功能筛选,包括ICIs和APCs。此外,我们观察到,在我们的研究中,这种效价测定将宿主分为应答者和无应答者。有趣的是,我们还发现人的PBMC对ICIs的反应存在显著差异,这可能与他们固有的免疫检查点分子表达水平有关。我们打算通过使用注释良好的临床样本的进一步研究来证实这一发现。引文格式:Marc Delcommenne, Eden Kleiman, Wushouer Ouerkaxi, Pirouz Daftarian。一种基于召回抗原的免疫调节生物制剂效价测定,可以区分应答者和无应答者[摘要]。第四届CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR国际癌症免疫治疗会议:将科学转化为生存;2018年9月30日至10月3日;纽约,纽约。费城(PA): AACR;癌症免疫学杂志,2019;7(2增刊):摘要nr B074。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abstract B074: A recall antigen-based potency assay for immunomodulatory biologics that could discriminate responders from nonresponders
The surge of therapeutic regimens involving immune checkpoint antagonists and co-stimulatory pathways (ACP) antagonists used as single agents or in combination necessitates better functional screening assays. In vitro functional screening assays need to be non-invasive and high throughput. The recall antigen assay is arguably the one that, in an antigen specific controlled system, directly assesses the activity of potential immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) candidates, in a relatively physiologically relevant manner. The recall antigen assay has been often used in the past to prove the potency of ICI or ACP as indicated in publications and submissions to regulatory bodies. We have conducted a thorough optimization combined with modifications to the recall antigen assay to enable the need for a more effective and efficient assay.Our recall antigen assay has been optimized across multiple parameters including donor selection based on expression of co-inhibitory/co-stimulatory molecules. This facilitates the selection of the right donor for the right candidate. We have optimized both stimulation and readout components to enhance signal to noise ratio. For example, we reduced the duration of in vitro antigen specific CD8+ T-cell clonotype expansion from 2 weeks to 5 to 7 days. To maximize the direct readout, we have used an MHC Tetramer guided analysis, using a cocktail of MHC tetramers made with stimulating peptides. To further empower the tetramer assay with functionality, we also have co-stained tetramer positive cells with activation markers. Finally, we verified the assay using various activity-confirmed ICIs and controls. The assay uses characterized PBMCs stimulated with a pool of peptides with positive and negative treatments (e.g., PD-1 blockades and IgG4) and “test samples,” which are the candidates to be tested. Depending on the donor’s recall responses, a typical assay results in two to 6-fold increase of the antigen specific MHC tetramer positive population. Furthermore, after developing this recall antigen assay, we validated it by performing the assay in different laboratories, using different reagents lots, different instrumentations, and different operators. Recall antigen assay data indicated that not all donors respond to approved immune checkpoint blockades. Healthy donors stimulated with anti CD3 or cytokine cocktails varied showed a wide a wide variability of immune checkpoint molecules (ICM) cell surface levels. Further studies using characterized PBMCs in our recall antigen potency assay revealed that the expression of immune checkpoint molecules may contribute in unresponsiveness to a given ICI. In conclusion, we have developed an improved in vitro recall antigen potency assay for immunomodulatory biologics functional screening including ICIs and APCs. Furthermore, we observed that in our studies this potency assay divides hosts into responders and nonresponders. Interestingly, we also showed significant variation of persons’ PBMC responses to ICIs, which may be related to their inherent expression levels of immune checkpoint molecules. We intend to confirm this finding with further studies using well-annotated clinical samples. Citation Format: Marc Delcommenne, Eden Kleiman, Wushouer Ouerkaxi, Pirouz Daftarian. A recall antigen-based potency assay for immunomodulatory biologics that could discriminate responders from nonresponders [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fourth CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; Sept 30-Oct 3, 2018; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2019;7(2 Suppl):Abstract nr B074.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信