Android上的隐藏权限:基于权限的Android手机隐私风险模型

Saliha Yilmaz, Mastaneh Davis
{"title":"Android上的隐藏权限:基于权限的Android手机隐私风险模型","authors":"Saliha Yilmaz, Mastaneh Davis","doi":"10.34190/eccws.22.1.1453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The continuously increasing amount of data input on mobile devices has made collating and monitoring users’ data not only uniquely personalised but easier than ever. Along with that, mobile security threats have overtaken with rising numbers in bank fraud and personal information leaks. This suggests that there is a significant lack of awareness of security issues among mobile users. Specifically, permission-based passive content leaks are getting more attention due to the emerging issues in data privacy. One reason for this is that permissions are running in the background collecting and transmitting data between applications within the same permission group, without the user's knowledge. This means, that a supposedly innocent application like the Clock, which is linked with the Calendar to provide the date and time functionality, can have access to any other application within the same Calendar permission group, which is compromising confidentiality. Moreover, this can lead to a violation of data privacy as the user is not aware of which assets are being shared between permissions. Developers of mobile platforms have implemented permission-based models to counteract these issues, however, application designers have shown that they are not necessarily complying with the General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR). For the mobile user, this means that app developers, app providers, and third parties who are included in the applications, can gain access to sensitive data without user consent or awareness. To address this issue, this study examines permissions that are inherent in the Android mobile infrastructure and exemplifies how they can reveal delicate user information, identify user behaviour, and can be shared among other applications - without obviously breaching GDPR guidelines. 10 first-party Android applications were statically analysed by their permissions and manually investigated for their actual purpose and privacy risk. Finally, considering the affected area, these permissions were categorised into four asset groups that form the base of a risk model. With risk levels from low to high, this model provides detection of risks on data privacy in mobile permissions and highlights the difficulty with GDPR compliance, which we therefore named PRAM, a permission-based Android Mobile Privacy Risk Assessment Model.","PeriodicalId":258360,"journal":{"name":"European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security","volume":"509 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hidden Permissions on Android: A Permission-Based Android Mobile Privacy Risk Model\",\"authors\":\"Saliha Yilmaz, Mastaneh Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.34190/eccws.22.1.1453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The continuously increasing amount of data input on mobile devices has made collating and monitoring users’ data not only uniquely personalised but easier than ever. Along with that, mobile security threats have overtaken with rising numbers in bank fraud and personal information leaks. This suggests that there is a significant lack of awareness of security issues among mobile users. Specifically, permission-based passive content leaks are getting more attention due to the emerging issues in data privacy. One reason for this is that permissions are running in the background collecting and transmitting data between applications within the same permission group, without the user's knowledge. This means, that a supposedly innocent application like the Clock, which is linked with the Calendar to provide the date and time functionality, can have access to any other application within the same Calendar permission group, which is compromising confidentiality. Moreover, this can lead to a violation of data privacy as the user is not aware of which assets are being shared between permissions. Developers of mobile platforms have implemented permission-based models to counteract these issues, however, application designers have shown that they are not necessarily complying with the General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR). For the mobile user, this means that app developers, app providers, and third parties who are included in the applications, can gain access to sensitive data without user consent or awareness. To address this issue, this study examines permissions that are inherent in the Android mobile infrastructure and exemplifies how they can reveal delicate user information, identify user behaviour, and can be shared among other applications - without obviously breaching GDPR guidelines. 10 first-party Android applications were statically analysed by their permissions and manually investigated for their actual purpose and privacy risk. Finally, considering the affected area, these permissions were categorised into four asset groups that form the base of a risk model. With risk levels from low to high, this model provides detection of risks on data privacy in mobile permissions and highlights the difficulty with GDPR compliance, which we therefore named PRAM, a permission-based Android Mobile Privacy Risk Assessment Model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":258360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security\",\"volume\":\"509 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34190/eccws.22.1.1453\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34190/eccws.22.1.1453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

移动设备上不断增加的数据输入量使得整理和监控用户数据不仅具有独特的个性化,而且比以往任何时候都更容易。与此同时,随着银行欺诈和个人信息泄露的数量不断增加,移动安全威胁也日益严重。这表明移动用户对安全问题的认识严重不足。具体来说,由于数据隐私问题的出现,基于许可的被动内容泄露越来越受到关注。其中一个原因是,在用户不知情的情况下,权限在后台运行,在同一权限组内的应用程序之间收集和传输数据。这意味着,像Clock这样看似无害的应用程序(它与Calendar链接以提供日期和时间功能)可以访问同一Calendar权限组中的任何其他应用程序,这损害了机密性。此外,这可能导致侵犯数据隐私,因为用户不知道哪些资产在权限之间共享。移动平台的开发人员已经实现了基于许可的模型来解决这些问题,然而,应用程序设计人员已经表明,他们不一定遵守通用数据保护条例(GDPR)。对于移动用户来说,这意味着应用程序开发人员、应用程序提供商和应用程序中的第三方可以在未经用户同意或不知情的情况下访问敏感数据。为了解决这个问题,本研究考察了Android移动基础设施中固有的权限,并举例说明了它们如何揭示微妙的用户信息,识别用户行为,以及如何在其他应用程序之间共享-而不会明显违反GDPR指南。我们静态分析了10款第一方Android应用的权限,并手动调查了它们的实际用途和隐私风险。最后,考虑到受影响的区域,这些权限被分为四个资产组,这些资产组构成了风险模型的基础。该模型具有从低到高的风险等级,提供了移动许可中数据隐私风险的检测,并突出了GDPR合规的难度,因此我们将其命名为PRAM,即基于许可的Android移动隐私风险评估模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hidden Permissions on Android: A Permission-Based Android Mobile Privacy Risk Model
The continuously increasing amount of data input on mobile devices has made collating and monitoring users’ data not only uniquely personalised but easier than ever. Along with that, mobile security threats have overtaken with rising numbers in bank fraud and personal information leaks. This suggests that there is a significant lack of awareness of security issues among mobile users. Specifically, permission-based passive content leaks are getting more attention due to the emerging issues in data privacy. One reason for this is that permissions are running in the background collecting and transmitting data between applications within the same permission group, without the user's knowledge. This means, that a supposedly innocent application like the Clock, which is linked with the Calendar to provide the date and time functionality, can have access to any other application within the same Calendar permission group, which is compromising confidentiality. Moreover, this can lead to a violation of data privacy as the user is not aware of which assets are being shared between permissions. Developers of mobile platforms have implemented permission-based models to counteract these issues, however, application designers have shown that they are not necessarily complying with the General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR). For the mobile user, this means that app developers, app providers, and third parties who are included in the applications, can gain access to sensitive data without user consent or awareness. To address this issue, this study examines permissions that are inherent in the Android mobile infrastructure and exemplifies how they can reveal delicate user information, identify user behaviour, and can be shared among other applications - without obviously breaching GDPR guidelines. 10 first-party Android applications were statically analysed by their permissions and manually investigated for their actual purpose and privacy risk. Finally, considering the affected area, these permissions were categorised into four asset groups that form the base of a risk model. With risk levels from low to high, this model provides detection of risks on data privacy in mobile permissions and highlights the difficulty with GDPR compliance, which we therefore named PRAM, a permission-based Android Mobile Privacy Risk Assessment Model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信