亮度感知的定向差分高斯模型

M. McCourt, B. Blakeslee, D. Cope
{"title":"亮度感知的定向差分高斯模型","authors":"M. McCourt, B. Blakeslee, D. Cope","doi":"10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2016.6.RETINEX-019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Oriented Difference of Gaussians (ODOG) model (6) was developed to gauge the degree to which “early” visual processes such as spatial filtering and response normalization could account for human brightness percepts in a set of canonical stimuli including the White effect (44-46), classical simultaneous brightness contrast (SBC) (25), and grating induction (GI) (3, 5, 20, 34, 37, 48). The ODOG model successfully predicts changes in the magnitude of the White effect (9) and GI (11) as a function of inducing grating spatial frequency and test patch height, as well as the relative magnitude of brightness variations in many other stimuli including the Hermann Grid (8), the Gelb Staircase (16,17), the Wertheimer-Benary Cross (4, 7, 8), Howe's variations on White’s stimulus (15, 28), Todorovic’s (43) and Williams, McCoy, & Purves’ (47) variations on the SBC stimulus (6, 12), the checkerboard induction stimulus (9, 19), the shifted White stimulus (9, 45), Adelson’s Checker-Shadow (1, 12), Snake stimulus (2, 8, 12, 41), and Corrugated Mondrian stimuli (1, 8), including Todorovic’s variation (7, 8, 43), Hillis & Brainard’s Paint/Shadow stimulus (12, 27), “remote” induction stimuli (8, 10, 32, 40), and in the probe discs placed in Cartier-Bresson photographs (12, 22).","PeriodicalId":326060,"journal":{"name":"Retinex at 50","volume":"496 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Oriented Difference-of-Gaussians Model of Brightness Perception\",\"authors\":\"M. McCourt, B. Blakeslee, D. Cope\",\"doi\":\"10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2016.6.RETINEX-019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Oriented Difference of Gaussians (ODOG) model (6) was developed to gauge the degree to which “early” visual processes such as spatial filtering and response normalization could account for human brightness percepts in a set of canonical stimuli including the White effect (44-46), classical simultaneous brightness contrast (SBC) (25), and grating induction (GI) (3, 5, 20, 34, 37, 48). The ODOG model successfully predicts changes in the magnitude of the White effect (9) and GI (11) as a function of inducing grating spatial frequency and test patch height, as well as the relative magnitude of brightness variations in many other stimuli including the Hermann Grid (8), the Gelb Staircase (16,17), the Wertheimer-Benary Cross (4, 7, 8), Howe's variations on White’s stimulus (15, 28), Todorovic’s (43) and Williams, McCoy, & Purves’ (47) variations on the SBC stimulus (6, 12), the checkerboard induction stimulus (9, 19), the shifted White stimulus (9, 45), Adelson’s Checker-Shadow (1, 12), Snake stimulus (2, 8, 12, 41), and Corrugated Mondrian stimuli (1, 8), including Todorovic’s variation (7, 8, 43), Hillis & Brainard’s Paint/Shadow stimulus (12, 27), “remote” induction stimuli (8, 10, 32, 40), and in the probe discs placed in Cartier-Bresson photographs (12, 22).\",\"PeriodicalId\":326060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Retinex at 50\",\"volume\":\"496 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Retinex at 50\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2016.6.RETINEX-019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retinex at 50","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2016.6.RETINEX-019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

开发了面向高斯差分(ODOG)模型(6),以衡量“早期”视觉过程(如空间滤波和响应归一化)在一系列典型刺激下对人类亮度感知的影响程度,这些典型刺激包括White效应(44-46)、经典同步亮度对比(SBC)(25)和光栅感应(GI)(3,5,20,34,37,48)。ODOG模型成功预测变化的大小白色效果(9)和胃肠道(11)诱导光栅空间频率的函数和测试补丁的高度,以及亮度变化的相对大小在许多其他刺激包括赫尔曼网格(8),Gelb楼梯(16、17),Wertheimer-Benary交叉(4、7、8),豪的变化在白色的刺激(15,28),Todorovic(43)和威廉姆斯,真品,Purves的南方浸信会(47)变体刺激(6、12),棋盘感应刺激(9,19)、移位白色刺激(9,45)、Adelson的棋盘阴影刺激(1,12)、Snake刺激(2,8,12,41)和瓦状蒙德里安刺激(1,8),包括Todorovic的变异刺激(7,8,43)、Hillis & Brainard的油漆/阴影刺激(12,27)、“远程”感应刺激(8,10,32,40),以及放置在卡蒂埃-布列松照片中的探针盘(12,22)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Oriented Difference-of-Gaussians Model of Brightness Perception
The Oriented Difference of Gaussians (ODOG) model (6) was developed to gauge the degree to which “early” visual processes such as spatial filtering and response normalization could account for human brightness percepts in a set of canonical stimuli including the White effect (44-46), classical simultaneous brightness contrast (SBC) (25), and grating induction (GI) (3, 5, 20, 34, 37, 48). The ODOG model successfully predicts changes in the magnitude of the White effect (9) and GI (11) as a function of inducing grating spatial frequency and test patch height, as well as the relative magnitude of brightness variations in many other stimuli including the Hermann Grid (8), the Gelb Staircase (16,17), the Wertheimer-Benary Cross (4, 7, 8), Howe's variations on White’s stimulus (15, 28), Todorovic’s (43) and Williams, McCoy, & Purves’ (47) variations on the SBC stimulus (6, 12), the checkerboard induction stimulus (9, 19), the shifted White stimulus (9, 45), Adelson’s Checker-Shadow (1, 12), Snake stimulus (2, 8, 12, 41), and Corrugated Mondrian stimuli (1, 8), including Todorovic’s variation (7, 8, 43), Hillis & Brainard’s Paint/Shadow stimulus (12, 27), “remote” induction stimuli (8, 10, 32, 40), and in the probe discs placed in Cartier-Bresson photographs (12, 22).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信