中美创客空间云平台模式比较研究

Lv Bo, Guo Qiaoling, Zhi Yechao
{"title":"中美创客空间云平台模式比较研究","authors":"Lv Bo, Guo Qiaoling, Zhi Yechao","doi":"10.11648/J.IJEFM.20190706.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper constructs a comparison framework of the cloud-based platform model consisting of cloud foundation, cloud function, cloud resource, cloud collaboration and cloud sustainability, and randomly selects 610 of Chinese maker space and American maker space as comparable samples. A comparative study was made on the status quo of its development. The study found that the similarity lies in the fact that both China and the US have rapidly grown in number, creating more than 30 types of cloud functions, gathering more than 80 types of cloud resources, forming a cloud collaboration network, and initially generating a sustainable cloud platform ecosystem. The difference is that the US created a space early, on the cloud to form an advanced infrastructure with 3D printing as the standard, highlighting online interaction on cloud functions, vertical areas on cloud resources, and cloud collaboration pursue intelligent matching and comprehensively utilize up to 12 revenue channels in cloud sustainability. Aiming at the problems existing in Chinese maker space cloud platform model, this paper reveals the external manifestation of the US maker space cloud platform model. It gives enlightenment to China from cloud foundation, cloud function, cloud resource, cloud collaboration and cloud sustainability. And revealing the logic of internal development, and proposing that Chinese mass maker space should be “table” and “inside” and to promote the soundness and development of the model of space cloud platform in China.","PeriodicalId":258703,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study on Cloud Platform Model of Chinese and American Maker Space\",\"authors\":\"Lv Bo, Guo Qiaoling, Zhi Yechao\",\"doi\":\"10.11648/J.IJEFM.20190706.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper constructs a comparison framework of the cloud-based platform model consisting of cloud foundation, cloud function, cloud resource, cloud collaboration and cloud sustainability, and randomly selects 610 of Chinese maker space and American maker space as comparable samples. A comparative study was made on the status quo of its development. The study found that the similarity lies in the fact that both China and the US have rapidly grown in number, creating more than 30 types of cloud functions, gathering more than 80 types of cloud resources, forming a cloud collaboration network, and initially generating a sustainable cloud platform ecosystem. The difference is that the US created a space early, on the cloud to form an advanced infrastructure with 3D printing as the standard, highlighting online interaction on cloud functions, vertical areas on cloud resources, and cloud collaboration pursue intelligent matching and comprehensively utilize up to 12 revenue channels in cloud sustainability. Aiming at the problems existing in Chinese maker space cloud platform model, this paper reveals the external manifestation of the US maker space cloud platform model. It gives enlightenment to China from cloud foundation, cloud function, cloud resource, cloud collaboration and cloud sustainability. And revealing the logic of internal development, and proposing that Chinese mass maker space should be “table” and “inside” and to promote the soundness and development of the model of space cloud platform in China.\",\"PeriodicalId\":258703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences\",\"volume\":\"136 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IJEFM.20190706.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IJEFM.20190706.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文构建了由云基础、云功能、云资源、云协作和云可持续性组成的云平台模型比较框架,随机选取中国创客空间和美国创客空间的610家企业作为比较样本。对其发展现状进行了比较研究。研究发现,相似之处在于,中国和美国都在数量上快速增长,创造了30多种云功能,聚集了80多种云资源,形成了云协作网络,初步形成了可持续的云平台生态系统。不同的是,美国开创空间较早,在云上形成以3D打印为标准的先进基础设施,在云功能上突出线上互动,在云资源上突出垂直领域,在云协同上追求智能匹配,在云可持续性上综合利用多达12个收益渠道。本文针对中国创客空间云平台模式存在的问题,揭示了美国创客空间云平台模式的外在表现。从云基础、云功能、云资源、云协作、云可持续性等方面给中国带来启示。并揭示内部发展的逻辑,提出中国大众创客空间应“表”与“内”,促进中国空间云平台模式的健全与发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study on Cloud Platform Model of Chinese and American Maker Space
This paper constructs a comparison framework of the cloud-based platform model consisting of cloud foundation, cloud function, cloud resource, cloud collaboration and cloud sustainability, and randomly selects 610 of Chinese maker space and American maker space as comparable samples. A comparative study was made on the status quo of its development. The study found that the similarity lies in the fact that both China and the US have rapidly grown in number, creating more than 30 types of cloud functions, gathering more than 80 types of cloud resources, forming a cloud collaboration network, and initially generating a sustainable cloud platform ecosystem. The difference is that the US created a space early, on the cloud to form an advanced infrastructure with 3D printing as the standard, highlighting online interaction on cloud functions, vertical areas on cloud resources, and cloud collaboration pursue intelligent matching and comprehensively utilize up to 12 revenue channels in cloud sustainability. Aiming at the problems existing in Chinese maker space cloud platform model, this paper reveals the external manifestation of the US maker space cloud platform model. It gives enlightenment to China from cloud foundation, cloud function, cloud resource, cloud collaboration and cloud sustainability. And revealing the logic of internal development, and proposing that Chinese mass maker space should be “table” and “inside” and to promote the soundness and development of the model of space cloud platform in China.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信