科学家行为不端?多学科商业化项目团队中的冲突

A. Kingon, T. Baker, Roger Debo
{"title":"科学家行为不端?多学科商业化项目团队中的冲突","authors":"A. Kingon, T. Baker, Roger Debo","doi":"10.1108/S1048-4736(2010)0000021006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter addresses the behavioral problems and conflicts observed in multidisciplinary university commercialization teams. We examined 59 commercialization projects at one U.S. university, supplemented by a similar number of projects at other universities in the United States and Europe. We applied well-established ideas about distinctive “thought worlds,” including both cognitive and motivational factors to understand patterns of selective perception and issue prioritization. The resulting analysis allows us to draw tentative conclusions regarding improved management practices aimed at managing the conflicts and improving university commercialization initiatives. We discuss the generalizability of the results.","PeriodicalId":108758,"journal":{"name":"Advances in The Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, & Economic Growth","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scientists behaving badly? Conflicts in multidisciplinary commercialization project teams\",\"authors\":\"A. Kingon, T. Baker, Roger Debo\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/S1048-4736(2010)0000021006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter addresses the behavioral problems and conflicts observed in multidisciplinary university commercialization teams. We examined 59 commercialization projects at one U.S. university, supplemented by a similar number of projects at other universities in the United States and Europe. We applied well-established ideas about distinctive “thought worlds,” including both cognitive and motivational factors to understand patterns of selective perception and issue prioritization. The resulting analysis allows us to draw tentative conclusions regarding improved management practices aimed at managing the conflicts and improving university commercialization initiatives. We discuss the generalizability of the results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in The Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, & Economic Growth\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in The Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, & Economic Growth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1048-4736(2010)0000021006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in The Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, & Economic Growth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1048-4736(2010)0000021006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本章论述了多学科大学商业化团队中存在的行为问题和冲突。我们调查了一所美国大学的59个商业化项目,并辅以美国和欧洲其他大学的类似数量的项目。我们应用了关于独特的“思想世界”的成熟观点,包括认知和动机因素来理解选择性感知和问题优先级的模式。由此产生的分析使我们能够得出关于改进管理实践的初步结论,这些管理实践旨在管理冲突和提高大学商业化的主动性。我们讨论了结果的可推广性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scientists behaving badly? Conflicts in multidisciplinary commercialization project teams
This chapter addresses the behavioral problems and conflicts observed in multidisciplinary university commercialization teams. We examined 59 commercialization projects at one U.S. university, supplemented by a similar number of projects at other universities in the United States and Europe. We applied well-established ideas about distinctive “thought worlds,” including both cognitive and motivational factors to understand patterns of selective perception and issue prioritization. The resulting analysis allows us to draw tentative conclusions regarding improved management practices aimed at managing the conflicts and improving university commercialization initiatives. We discuss the generalizability of the results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信