矢量控制感应电机驱动两种自适应控制方法的可行性研究

J. Balda, S. Ang
{"title":"矢量控制感应电机驱动两种自适应控制方法的可行性研究","authors":"J. Balda, S. Ang","doi":"10.1109/PESC.1990.131238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors evaluate two adaptive control methods for vector-controlled AC drives under parameter variations, namely a minimum variance controller (MVC) and a model reference exact-matching (MREM) method. They compare them to a nonadaptive model reference complementary controller (MRCC) and address their potential impact on designing PWM (pulse width modulation) inverters. Digital simulation results indicate that although all the methods considered had similar responses for nominal conditions, the MVC and MREM exhibited a higher performance than the MRCC under variations of the rotor time constant. However, the MVC PWM signal placed a more severe burden on the PWM stage. It is concluded that a comprehensive solution for the problem of parameter variations should include a combination of an identification method for the rotor parameters and adaptive control method to meet the desired specifications (rise time, bandwidth, speed range, etc.).<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":330807,"journal":{"name":"21st Annual IEEE Conference on Power Electronics Specialists","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A feasibility study of two adaptive-control methods for vector-controlled induction motor drives\",\"authors\":\"J. Balda, S. Ang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PESC.1990.131238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors evaluate two adaptive control methods for vector-controlled AC drives under parameter variations, namely a minimum variance controller (MVC) and a model reference exact-matching (MREM) method. They compare them to a nonadaptive model reference complementary controller (MRCC) and address their potential impact on designing PWM (pulse width modulation) inverters. Digital simulation results indicate that although all the methods considered had similar responses for nominal conditions, the MVC and MREM exhibited a higher performance than the MRCC under variations of the rotor time constant. However, the MVC PWM signal placed a more severe burden on the PWM stage. It is concluded that a comprehensive solution for the problem of parameter variations should include a combination of an identification method for the rotor parameters and adaptive control method to meet the desired specifications (rise time, bandwidth, speed range, etc.).<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":330807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"21st Annual IEEE Conference on Power Electronics Specialists\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"21st Annual IEEE Conference on Power Electronics Specialists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PESC.1990.131238\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"21st Annual IEEE Conference on Power Electronics Specialists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PESC.1990.131238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究了参数变化下矢量控制交流变频器的两种自适应控制方法,即最小方差控制器(MVC)和模型参考精确匹配(MREM)方法。他们将其与非自适应模型参考互补控制器(MRCC)进行了比较,并讨论了它们对设计PWM(脉宽调制)逆变器的潜在影响。数字仿真结果表明,尽管所考虑的所有方法在标称条件下具有相似的响应,但在转子时间常数的变化下,MVC和MREM表现出比MRCC更高的性能。然而,MVC PWM信号给PWM阶段带来了更严重的负担。综上所述,对参数变化问题的综合解决方案应包括转子参数的识别方法与满足所需规格(上升时间、带宽、速度范围等)的自适应控制方法相结合
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A feasibility study of two adaptive-control methods for vector-controlled induction motor drives
The authors evaluate two adaptive control methods for vector-controlled AC drives under parameter variations, namely a minimum variance controller (MVC) and a model reference exact-matching (MREM) method. They compare them to a nonadaptive model reference complementary controller (MRCC) and address their potential impact on designing PWM (pulse width modulation) inverters. Digital simulation results indicate that although all the methods considered had similar responses for nominal conditions, the MVC and MREM exhibited a higher performance than the MRCC under variations of the rotor time constant. However, the MVC PWM signal placed a more severe burden on the PWM stage. It is concluded that a comprehensive solution for the problem of parameter variations should include a combination of an identification method for the rotor parameters and adaptive control method to meet the desired specifications (rise time, bandwidth, speed range, etc.).<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信