{"title":"果蝇优化算法与引力搜索算法的比较分析","authors":"Xiaohua Li","doi":"10.1109/CIS2018.2018.00020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, two evolutionary methods, Drosophila Optimization (DO) and Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA), are compared. Important problem of evolutionary methods is how to balance exploitation and exploration. We take a set of numerical experiments to verify the performance of these methods. Numerical results show that GSA is better than DO in convergence rate or accuracy.","PeriodicalId":185099,"journal":{"name":"2018 14th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security (CIS)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Comparing Analysis of Drosophila Optimization and Gravitational Search Algorithm\",\"authors\":\"Xiaohua Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CIS2018.2018.00020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, two evolutionary methods, Drosophila Optimization (DO) and Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA), are compared. Important problem of evolutionary methods is how to balance exploitation and exploration. We take a set of numerical experiments to verify the performance of these methods. Numerical results show that GSA is better than DO in convergence rate or accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":185099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 14th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security (CIS)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 14th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security (CIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIS2018.2018.00020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 14th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security (CIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIS2018.2018.00020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Comparing Analysis of Drosophila Optimization and Gravitational Search Algorithm
In this paper, two evolutionary methods, Drosophila Optimization (DO) and Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA), are compared. Important problem of evolutionary methods is how to balance exploitation and exploration. We take a set of numerical experiments to verify the performance of these methods. Numerical results show that GSA is better than DO in convergence rate or accuracy.