如果你支持自由贸易,为什么不支持自由移民?

E. Rasmusen
{"title":"如果你支持自由贸易,为什么不支持自由移民?","authors":"E. Rasmusen","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2840260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Immigration increases the income of native capital more than it reduces the income of native labor, although the transfer of income from labor to capital is a much bigger effect. Free trade often does this too. Even aside from possible negative externalities and public finance costs to natives, however, immigration is different because if the aggregate production function has diminishing returns to private capital and labor the conclusion of increased overall income can easily be reversed. Such a production function is plausible because public capital — government capital and social capital — is unpriced and fixed, with immigrant labor receiving a portion of its benefit. Thus, even aside from fiscal effects and social externalities, whether the total income of natives rises or falls with immigration is open to doubt.","PeriodicalId":134919,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Politics of Immigration (Topic)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"If You Support Free Trade, Why Not Free Immigration?\",\"authors\":\"E. Rasmusen\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2840260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Immigration increases the income of native capital more than it reduces the income of native labor, although the transfer of income from labor to capital is a much bigger effect. Free trade often does this too. Even aside from possible negative externalities and public finance costs to natives, however, immigration is different because if the aggregate production function has diminishing returns to private capital and labor the conclusion of increased overall income can easily be reversed. Such a production function is plausible because public capital — government capital and social capital — is unpriced and fixed, with immigrant labor receiving a portion of its benefit. Thus, even aside from fiscal effects and social externalities, whether the total income of natives rises or falls with immigration is open to doubt.\",\"PeriodicalId\":134919,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Politics of Immigration (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Politics of Immigration (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2840260\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Politics of Immigration (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2840260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

移民增加本土资本收入的作用大于减少本土劳动力收入的作用,尽管从劳动力到资本的收入转移的影响要大得多。自由贸易通常也是如此。然而,即使不考虑可能的负面外部性和对本地人的公共财政成本,移民也是不同的,因为如果总生产函数对私人资本和劳动力的回报递减,那么总收入增加的结论很容易被逆转。这样的生产函数是合理的,因为公共资本——政府资本和社会资本——是不定价的和固定的,移民劳工从中获得了一部分利益。因此,即使不考虑财政影响和社会外部性,本地人的总收入是否会随着移民而上升或下降也值得怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
If You Support Free Trade, Why Not Free Immigration?
Immigration increases the income of native capital more than it reduces the income of native labor, although the transfer of income from labor to capital is a much bigger effect. Free trade often does this too. Even aside from possible negative externalities and public finance costs to natives, however, immigration is different because if the aggregate production function has diminishing returns to private capital and labor the conclusion of increased overall income can easily be reversed. Such a production function is plausible because public capital — government capital and social capital — is unpriced and fixed, with immigrant labor receiving a portion of its benefit. Thus, even aside from fiscal effects and social externalities, whether the total income of natives rises or falls with immigration is open to doubt.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信