反垄断行动后知识产权政策修订的回顾

A. Layne-Farrar
{"title":"反垄断行动后知识产权政策修订的回顾","authors":"A. Layne-Farrar","doi":"10.1109/SIIT.2013.6774577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The debate over potential antitrust concerns for the use of protected intellectual property within standard setting often centers on the rules and regulations in place at Standard Setting Organizations (SSOs). I consider a broader question of IPR policy: what are SSOs doing, of their own volition, to address apparent antitrust gaps or weaknesses within their IPR rules? This paper systematically assesses what SSOs have actually done (or failed to do) in reaction to antitrust concerns, as those concerns emerge over time.","PeriodicalId":146847,"journal":{"name":"2013 8th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of IPR policy revisions in the wake of antitrust actions\",\"authors\":\"A. Layne-Farrar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SIIT.2013.6774577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The debate over potential antitrust concerns for the use of protected intellectual property within standard setting often centers on the rules and regulations in place at Standard Setting Organizations (SSOs). I consider a broader question of IPR policy: what are SSOs doing, of their own volition, to address apparent antitrust gaps or weaknesses within their IPR rules? This paper systematically assesses what SSOs have actually done (or failed to do) in reaction to antitrust concerns, as those concerns emerge over time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":146847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 8th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 8th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIIT.2013.6774577\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 8th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIIT.2013.6774577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于在标准制定中使用受保护的知识产权的潜在反垄断问题的辩论,往往集中在标准制定组织(SSOs)的规章制度上。我考虑了一个关于知识产权政策的更广泛的问题:社会服务组织如何根据自己的意愿,解决其知识产权规则中明显的反垄断漏洞或弱点?本文系统地评估了社会组织在应对反垄断担忧时实际做了什么(或没有做什么),因为这些担忧随着时间的推移而出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A review of IPR policy revisions in the wake of antitrust actions
The debate over potential antitrust concerns for the use of protected intellectual property within standard setting often centers on the rules and regulations in place at Standard Setting Organizations (SSOs). I consider a broader question of IPR policy: what are SSOs doing, of their own volition, to address apparent antitrust gaps or weaknesses within their IPR rules? This paper systematically assesses what SSOs have actually done (or failed to do) in reaction to antitrust concerns, as those concerns emerge over time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信