1. 历史的浪漫,或个体发生,有时概括了系统发生

{"title":"1. 历史的浪漫,或个体发生,有时概括了系统发生","authors":"","doi":"10.7591/9781501723063-005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This book is primarily a formal analysis; it focuses on enduring problems of distinguishing and defining form, in this case the English novel, not on the specific and changing historical condi­ tions within which that novel develops . Yet from a feminist per­ spective one of the material problems in women's relation to the definition of form must be the problem of the material. Many femi­ nist literary critics-such as Biddy Martin, Nancy Armstrong, Cora Kaplan, Mary Poovey, or Gayatri Spivak-have argued that we need to give renewed attention to material conditions in order to understand the role of gender within the novelistic tradition-and, along with that, to analyze our cultural situation properly and perhaps also to change it. That attention would take the form of an attention to history and the historical process, which such critics claim might grant some access to the material, perhaps enough to help us modify our conditions. 1 These feminist investigations that attend to material context have been invaluable . In this chapter, however, while not denying or refusing the material, I open up the questions I ask later on by","PeriodicalId":162265,"journal":{"name":"Women and Romance","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"1. The Romance of History, or Ontogeny Recapitulates Phylogeny, Sometimes\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.7591/9781501723063-005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This book is primarily a formal analysis; it focuses on enduring problems of distinguishing and defining form, in this case the English novel, not on the specific and changing historical condi­ tions within which that novel develops . Yet from a feminist per­ spective one of the material problems in women's relation to the definition of form must be the problem of the material. Many femi­ nist literary critics-such as Biddy Martin, Nancy Armstrong, Cora Kaplan, Mary Poovey, or Gayatri Spivak-have argued that we need to give renewed attention to material conditions in order to understand the role of gender within the novelistic tradition-and, along with that, to analyze our cultural situation properly and perhaps also to change it. That attention would take the form of an attention to history and the historical process, which such critics claim might grant some access to the material, perhaps enough to help us modify our conditions. 1 These feminist investigations that attend to material context have been invaluable . In this chapter, however, while not denying or refusing the material, I open up the questions I ask later on by\",\"PeriodicalId\":162265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women and Romance\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women and Romance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501723063-005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women and Romance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501723063-005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这本书主要是一种形式分析;它关注的是区分和定义形式的持久问题,在这里是英国小说,而不是小说发展的具体和不断变化的历史条件。然而,从女性主义的角度来看,女性与形式定义的关系中的物质问题之一必须是物质问题。许多女权主义文学评论家——如毕蒂·马丁、南希·阿姆斯特朗、科拉·卡普兰、玛丽·普维或加亚特里·斯皮瓦克——都认为我们需要重新关注物质条件,以便理解小说传统中性别的角色——并且,与此同时,正确地分析我们的文化状况,或许也能改变它。这种关注将以关注历史和历史进程的形式出现,这些批评者声称,这可能会让我们接触到一些材料,也许足以帮助我们改变我们的处境。这些关注物质背景的女权主义研究是非常宝贵的。然而,在这一章中,虽然不否认或拒绝材料,但我打开了我稍后要问的问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
1. The Romance of History, or Ontogeny Recapitulates Phylogeny, Sometimes
This book is primarily a formal analysis; it focuses on enduring problems of distinguishing and defining form, in this case the English novel, not on the specific and changing historical condi­ tions within which that novel develops . Yet from a feminist per­ spective one of the material problems in women's relation to the definition of form must be the problem of the material. Many femi­ nist literary critics-such as Biddy Martin, Nancy Armstrong, Cora Kaplan, Mary Poovey, or Gayatri Spivak-have argued that we need to give renewed attention to material conditions in order to understand the role of gender within the novelistic tradition-and, along with that, to analyze our cultural situation properly and perhaps also to change it. That attention would take the form of an attention to history and the historical process, which such critics claim might grant some access to the material, perhaps enough to help us modify our conditions. 1 These feminist investigations that attend to material context have been invaluable . In this chapter, however, while not denying or refusing the material, I open up the questions I ask later on by
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信