公平竞争和再平衡:评论

Dan Ciuriak
{"title":"公平竞争和再平衡:评论","authors":"Dan Ciuriak","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3756444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most contentious and problematic issue negotiated in the Brexit deal was the so-called “level playing field”, which was to be preserved by the parties through “rebalancing” provisions. This note takes up the issue of the meaning of a “level playing field” in light of fundamental features of international trade: firm-level heterogeneity within industries; economic geography; policy heterogeneity in taxation and the provision of public goods; the principle of comparative advantage; and fluctuating national currencies. Based on this, it comments on the meaning in economic terms and practicality of “rebalancing”.","PeriodicalId":341166,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Trade Relationships (Topic)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Level Playing Fields and Rebalancing: A Comment\",\"authors\":\"Dan Ciuriak\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3756444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The most contentious and problematic issue negotiated in the Brexit deal was the so-called “level playing field”, which was to be preserved by the parties through “rebalancing” provisions. This note takes up the issue of the meaning of a “level playing field” in light of fundamental features of international trade: firm-level heterogeneity within industries; economic geography; policy heterogeneity in taxation and the provision of public goods; the principle of comparative advantage; and fluctuating national currencies. Based on this, it comments on the meaning in economic terms and practicality of “rebalancing”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":341166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Trade Relationships (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Trade Relationships (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3756444\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Trade Relationships (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3756444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

英国脱欧协议谈判中最具争议和问题的问题是所谓的“公平竞争环境”,这是各方通过“再平衡”条款来维护的。本文根据国际贸易的基本特征探讨了“公平竞争环境”的含义问题:行业内企业层面的异质性;经济地理学;税收和公共产品提供方面的政策异质性;比较优势原则;以及波动的国家货币。在此基础上,对“再平衡”的经济意义和现实意义进行了评述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Level Playing Fields and Rebalancing: A Comment
The most contentious and problematic issue negotiated in the Brexit deal was the so-called “level playing field”, which was to be preserved by the parties through “rebalancing” provisions. This note takes up the issue of the meaning of a “level playing field” in light of fundamental features of international trade: firm-level heterogeneity within industries; economic geography; policy heterogeneity in taxation and the provision of public goods; the principle of comparative advantage; and fluctuating national currencies. Based on this, it comments on the meaning in economic terms and practicality of “rebalancing”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信