企业与人权的诉讼景观

R. Mccorquodale
{"title":"企业与人权的诉讼景观","authors":"R. Mccorquodale","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198866220.003.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Robert McCorquodale outlines the wider business and human rights context of human rights litigation against multinationals and explains key concepts that arise. He highlights differences between civil law and common law systems in terms of sources of law and procedures, and between criminal and civil claims against multinationals. The concepts of separation of corporate identity and the tort law duty of care developed in the English cases are considered. The principles of European law on jurisdiction over corporations and choice of law are explained. The relevance, in multinational human rights cases, of public international law and sovereignty issues in forum non conveniens disputes, claims in the United States under the Alien Tort Statute, and by direct application in States such as Canada and the Netherlands, is discussed. The important contextual backdrop of developments such as the United Nations Guiding Principles (UNGPs), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Guidelines and other international standards is also highlighted.","PeriodicalId":373424,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Litigation against Multinationals in Practice","volume":"304 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Litigation Landscape of Business and Human Rights\",\"authors\":\"R. Mccorquodale\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198866220.003.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Robert McCorquodale outlines the wider business and human rights context of human rights litigation against multinationals and explains key concepts that arise. He highlights differences between civil law and common law systems in terms of sources of law and procedures, and between criminal and civil claims against multinationals. The concepts of separation of corporate identity and the tort law duty of care developed in the English cases are considered. The principles of European law on jurisdiction over corporations and choice of law are explained. The relevance, in multinational human rights cases, of public international law and sovereignty issues in forum non conveniens disputes, claims in the United States under the Alien Tort Statute, and by direct application in States such as Canada and the Netherlands, is discussed. The important contextual backdrop of developments such as the United Nations Guiding Principles (UNGPs), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Guidelines and other international standards is also highlighted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":373424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Rights Litigation against Multinationals in Practice\",\"volume\":\"304 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Rights Litigation against Multinationals in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198866220.003.0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Rights Litigation against Multinationals in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198866220.003.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

Robert McCorquodale概述了针对跨国公司的人权诉讼的更广泛的商业和人权背景,并解释了出现的关键概念。他强调了大陆法系和英美法系在法律渊源和程序方面的差异,以及针对跨国公司的刑事和民事索赔之间的差异。本文对英国案例中发展起来的企业形象分离概念和侵权法注意义务进行了分析。解释了欧洲法律关于公司管辖权和法律选择的原则。本文讨论了在多国人权案件中,国际公法和不方便法庭争端中的主权问题、根据《外国人侵权法》在美国提出的索赔以及在加拿大和荷兰等国的直接适用的相关性。报告还强调了联合国指导原则(UNGPs)、经济合作与发展组织(OECD)准则和其他国际标准等发展的重要背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Litigation Landscape of Business and Human Rights
Robert McCorquodale outlines the wider business and human rights context of human rights litigation against multinationals and explains key concepts that arise. He highlights differences between civil law and common law systems in terms of sources of law and procedures, and between criminal and civil claims against multinationals. The concepts of separation of corporate identity and the tort law duty of care developed in the English cases are considered. The principles of European law on jurisdiction over corporations and choice of law are explained. The relevance, in multinational human rights cases, of public international law and sovereignty issues in forum non conveniens disputes, claims in the United States under the Alien Tort Statute, and by direct application in States such as Canada and the Netherlands, is discussed. The important contextual backdrop of developments such as the United Nations Guiding Principles (UNGPs), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Guidelines and other international standards is also highlighted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信