印尼无力摆脱殖民法(就业法研究)

N. Hidayah, F. Esfandiari, Sholahuddin Al-Fatih
{"title":"印尼无力摆脱殖民法(就业法研究)","authors":"N. Hidayah, F. Esfandiari, Sholahuddin Al-Fatih","doi":"10.4108/EAI.1-7-2020.2303650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When a national law came into force, the previous law made in the colonial era was concrete that the Constitution should be repealed. For example, the enactment of Law No.5 / 19960 on the Basic Terms of the Agrarian repeal the provisions of land, water and natural resources contained in Book II of the Civil law, or the operation of Law No. 1/1974 on Marriage revokes the provisions on matters relating to marriage found in the Civil Law Book. However, this is not the case with the Employment Law where provisions of Chapter VIIA of Article 1601 of the Civil Code until 1617 of the Civil Code are still in effect, until the drafting of an omnibus draft law on Work Creation, also does not invalidate the provisions of the Employment in Code Civil Law. This study aims to examine historically and conceptually whether the terms of the employment in the Code Civil Law are right or not. Research method is normative. The results show that Indonesia must break free from colonial rule and gradually establish its national law that has the philosophical basis of Pancasila. To make it happen, the revisions to Law No. 13/2003 should be done in addition to the burden of: (a) employment agreement between husband and wife, b) provision of fines accompanying compensation, c) employers 'obligation to pay wages on time, d) employers' obligation to provide employment certificates, 5) Responsibility and compensation for Outsourcing Contract.","PeriodicalId":447688,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Indonesian Legal Studies, ICILS 2020, July 1st 2020, Semarang, Indonesia","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indonesia's Inability in Removing Self from Colonial Law (Study of Employment Laws)\",\"authors\":\"N. Hidayah, F. Esfandiari, Sholahuddin Al-Fatih\",\"doi\":\"10.4108/EAI.1-7-2020.2303650\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When a national law came into force, the previous law made in the colonial era was concrete that the Constitution should be repealed. For example, the enactment of Law No.5 / 19960 on the Basic Terms of the Agrarian repeal the provisions of land, water and natural resources contained in Book II of the Civil law, or the operation of Law No. 1/1974 on Marriage revokes the provisions on matters relating to marriage found in the Civil Law Book. However, this is not the case with the Employment Law where provisions of Chapter VIIA of Article 1601 of the Civil Code until 1617 of the Civil Code are still in effect, until the drafting of an omnibus draft law on Work Creation, also does not invalidate the provisions of the Employment in Code Civil Law. This study aims to examine historically and conceptually whether the terms of the employment in the Code Civil Law are right or not. Research method is normative. The results show that Indonesia must break free from colonial rule and gradually establish its national law that has the philosophical basis of Pancasila. To make it happen, the revisions to Law No. 13/2003 should be done in addition to the burden of: (a) employment agreement between husband and wife, b) provision of fines accompanying compensation, c) employers 'obligation to pay wages on time, d) employers' obligation to provide employment certificates, 5) Responsibility and compensation for Outsourcing Contract.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Indonesian Legal Studies, ICILS 2020, July 1st 2020, Semarang, Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Indonesian Legal Studies, ICILS 2020, July 1st 2020, Semarang, Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4108/EAI.1-7-2020.2303650\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Indonesian Legal Studies, ICILS 2020, July 1st 2020, Semarang, Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/EAI.1-7-2020.2303650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

当国家法律生效时,殖民时期制定的法律明确规定宪法应该被废除。例如,关于土地基本条款的第5 / 1996号法律的颁布废除了《民法》第二册中关于土地、水和自然资源的规定,或关于婚姻的第1/1974号法律的实施废除了《民法》册中关于婚姻事项的规定。但是,《就业法》的情况并非如此,《民法典》第1601条至第1617条第七章的规定仍然有效,直到关于创造工作的综合法律草案起草完毕,《就业法典》民法的规定也不无效。本文旨在从历史上和概念上考察《民法典》中的雇佣条款是否正确。研究方法规范。结果表明,印尼必须摆脱殖民统治,逐步建立具有潘卡西拉哲学基础的国内法。为了实现这一目标,除了对第13/2003号法进行修订外,还应对以下方面进行负担:(a)夫妻之间的就业协议,(b)规定附带赔偿的罚款,(c)雇主按时支付工资的义务,(d)雇主提供就业证明的义务,(5)外包合同的责任和赔偿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Indonesia's Inability in Removing Self from Colonial Law (Study of Employment Laws)
When a national law came into force, the previous law made in the colonial era was concrete that the Constitution should be repealed. For example, the enactment of Law No.5 / 19960 on the Basic Terms of the Agrarian repeal the provisions of land, water and natural resources contained in Book II of the Civil law, or the operation of Law No. 1/1974 on Marriage revokes the provisions on matters relating to marriage found in the Civil Law Book. However, this is not the case with the Employment Law where provisions of Chapter VIIA of Article 1601 of the Civil Code until 1617 of the Civil Code are still in effect, until the drafting of an omnibus draft law on Work Creation, also does not invalidate the provisions of the Employment in Code Civil Law. This study aims to examine historically and conceptually whether the terms of the employment in the Code Civil Law are right or not. Research method is normative. The results show that Indonesia must break free from colonial rule and gradually establish its national law that has the philosophical basis of Pancasila. To make it happen, the revisions to Law No. 13/2003 should be done in addition to the burden of: (a) employment agreement between husband and wife, b) provision of fines accompanying compensation, c) employers 'obligation to pay wages on time, d) employers' obligation to provide employment certificates, 5) Responsibility and compensation for Outsourcing Contract.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信