学习活动管理系统类别最佳教师评价中的层次分析法

Dodi Guswandi, H. Syahputra, Agung Ramadhanu, Yogi Wiyandra, Suci Wahyuni
{"title":"学习活动管理系统类别最佳教师评价中的层次分析法","authors":"Dodi Guswandi, H. Syahputra, Agung Ramadhanu, Yogi Wiyandra, Suci Wahyuni","doi":"10.35134/komtekinfo.v8i4.191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The implementation of online lectures using blended learning needs to be assessed to find out the performance activities of lecturers with students in using the learning activity management system (LAMS) feature and reward lecturers with the best performance. Based on the assessment system of the best lecturers previously have not used the right methods so that the resulting decision is still not right and not accurate. This research aims to implement the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method in the assessment process of lecturers who are the best in using LAMS. The performance of the AHP method can determine the weight value of criteria consistently and can perform a role to produce solutions in decision making. The criteria indicators used to consist of Interactive Video Teaching Materials (C1), Audio Teaching Materials (C2), URLs (C3), Forum/FBL (C4), Slide Teaching Materials (C5), Assignments (C6), Quiz (C7), Attendance (C8), and Labels (C9). The results of this study showed that the performance of the Decision Support System (DSS) using the AHP method can determine a better weight value with a consistency level of 0.080049762 from 0.1. These results presented with AHP performance can provide weighting value on each criterion and continue the multiplication process with the best lecturer assessment data to get the results of the battle. Overall these results concluded that each criterion had a degree of consistent relationship in the best lecturer assessment on LAMS.","PeriodicalId":403738,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal KomtekInfo","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytical Hierarchy Process in The Assessment of The Best Teacher In the Category of Learning Activity Management System\",\"authors\":\"Dodi Guswandi, H. Syahputra, Agung Ramadhanu, Yogi Wiyandra, Suci Wahyuni\",\"doi\":\"10.35134/komtekinfo.v8i4.191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The implementation of online lectures using blended learning needs to be assessed to find out the performance activities of lecturers with students in using the learning activity management system (LAMS) feature and reward lecturers with the best performance. Based on the assessment system of the best lecturers previously have not used the right methods so that the resulting decision is still not right and not accurate. This research aims to implement the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method in the assessment process of lecturers who are the best in using LAMS. The performance of the AHP method can determine the weight value of criteria consistently and can perform a role to produce solutions in decision making. The criteria indicators used to consist of Interactive Video Teaching Materials (C1), Audio Teaching Materials (C2), URLs (C3), Forum/FBL (C4), Slide Teaching Materials (C5), Assignments (C6), Quiz (C7), Attendance (C8), and Labels (C9). The results of this study showed that the performance of the Decision Support System (DSS) using the AHP method can determine a better weight value with a consistency level of 0.080049762 from 0.1. These results presented with AHP performance can provide weighting value on each criterion and continue the multiplication process with the best lecturer assessment data to get the results of the battle. Overall these results concluded that each criterion had a degree of consistent relationship in the best lecturer assessment on LAMS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal KomtekInfo\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal KomtekInfo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35134/komtekinfo.v8i4.191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal KomtekInfo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35134/komtekinfo.v8i4.191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用混合学习的在线讲座的实施需要进行评估,以找出讲师与学生在使用学习活动管理系统(LAMS)功能方面的表现活动,并奖励表现最好的讲师。基于评估体系的最佳讲师以前没有使用正确的方法,所以最终的决定仍然是不正确和不准确的。本研究旨在将层次分析法(AHP)应用于最擅长运用LAMS的讲师之评鉴过程。AHP方法的性能可以一致地确定标准的权重值,并在决策中发挥产生解决方案的作用。使用的标准指标包括互动视频教材(C1)、音频教材(C2)、url (C3)、论坛/FBL (C4)、幻灯片教材(C5)、作业(C6)、测验(C7)、出勤率(C8)和标签(C9)。本研究结果表明,采用AHP方法的决策支持系统(DSS)的性能可以从0.1确定较好的权重值,一致性水平为0.080049762。这些结果与AHP性能相结合,可以为每个指标提供权重值,并与最佳讲师评价数据继续乘法过程,从而得到战斗结果。总的来说,这些结果得出的结论是,每个标准都有一定程度的一致关系,在最佳讲师的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analytical Hierarchy Process in The Assessment of The Best Teacher In the Category of Learning Activity Management System
The implementation of online lectures using blended learning needs to be assessed to find out the performance activities of lecturers with students in using the learning activity management system (LAMS) feature and reward lecturers with the best performance. Based on the assessment system of the best lecturers previously have not used the right methods so that the resulting decision is still not right and not accurate. This research aims to implement the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method in the assessment process of lecturers who are the best in using LAMS. The performance of the AHP method can determine the weight value of criteria consistently and can perform a role to produce solutions in decision making. The criteria indicators used to consist of Interactive Video Teaching Materials (C1), Audio Teaching Materials (C2), URLs (C3), Forum/FBL (C4), Slide Teaching Materials (C5), Assignments (C6), Quiz (C7), Attendance (C8), and Labels (C9). The results of this study showed that the performance of the Decision Support System (DSS) using the AHP method can determine a better weight value with a consistency level of 0.080049762 from 0.1. These results presented with AHP performance can provide weighting value on each criterion and continue the multiplication process with the best lecturer assessment data to get the results of the battle. Overall these results concluded that each criterion had a degree of consistent relationship in the best lecturer assessment on LAMS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信