“我们正在阐释的是一部宪法”

David S. Schwartz
{"title":"“我们正在阐释的是一部宪法”","authors":"David S. Schwartz","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190699482.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The thirty-odd years from the New Deal turnaround to the late 1960s represented a high-water mark for McCulloch v. Maryland. For the first time, the Supreme Court fully applied McCulloch to the Commerce Clause and the Reconstruction Amendments, and removed the concept of reserved state powers as a barrier to implied powers under these constitutional provisions. The post–New Deal Court recognized Congress’s authority to regulate virtually all aspects of the national economy and to legislate race relations and other issues of civil rights. Prior to 1941, the Court had limited McCulloch’s applicability to the Commerce Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment by subjecting the legislative powers of Congress to implied limitations arising out of the Tenth Amendment doctrine of reserved state powers. With the Tenth Amendment constraint removed, McCulloch for the first time was being applied to something like its full potential.","PeriodicalId":434435,"journal":{"name":"The Spirit of the Constitution","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“It Is a Constitution We Are Expounding”\",\"authors\":\"David S. Schwartz\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780190699482.003.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The thirty-odd years from the New Deal turnaround to the late 1960s represented a high-water mark for McCulloch v. Maryland. For the first time, the Supreme Court fully applied McCulloch to the Commerce Clause and the Reconstruction Amendments, and removed the concept of reserved state powers as a barrier to implied powers under these constitutional provisions. The post–New Deal Court recognized Congress’s authority to regulate virtually all aspects of the national economy and to legislate race relations and other issues of civil rights. Prior to 1941, the Court had limited McCulloch’s applicability to the Commerce Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment by subjecting the legislative powers of Congress to implied limitations arising out of the Tenth Amendment doctrine of reserved state powers. With the Tenth Amendment constraint removed, McCulloch for the first time was being applied to something like its full potential.\",\"PeriodicalId\":434435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Spirit of the Constitution\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Spirit of the Constitution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190699482.003.0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Spirit of the Constitution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190699482.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从新政的转变到20世纪60年代末,这30多年是麦卡洛克诉马里兰州案的高潮。最高法院首次将麦卡洛克案完全适用于《商业条款》和《重建修正案》,并取消了保留州权力作为这些宪法条款下默示权力的障碍的概念。新政后的法院承认国会有权管理国家经济的几乎所有方面,并对种族关系和其他公民权利问题进行立法。在1941年之前,最高法院限制了麦卡洛克对《商业条款》和《第十四条修正案》的适用,将国会的立法权置于《第十修正案》关于保留州权力的原则所隐含的限制之下。随着宪法第十修正案的限制被取消,麦卡洛克第一次被应用于发挥其全部潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“It Is a Constitution We Are Expounding”
The thirty-odd years from the New Deal turnaround to the late 1960s represented a high-water mark for McCulloch v. Maryland. For the first time, the Supreme Court fully applied McCulloch to the Commerce Clause and the Reconstruction Amendments, and removed the concept of reserved state powers as a barrier to implied powers under these constitutional provisions. The post–New Deal Court recognized Congress’s authority to regulate virtually all aspects of the national economy and to legislate race relations and other issues of civil rights. Prior to 1941, the Court had limited McCulloch’s applicability to the Commerce Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment by subjecting the legislative powers of Congress to implied limitations arising out of the Tenth Amendment doctrine of reserved state powers. With the Tenth Amendment constraint removed, McCulloch for the first time was being applied to something like its full potential.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信