Mixnets:解密和再加密类型的实现和性能评估

Pance Ribarski, Ljupcho Antovski
{"title":"Mixnets:解密和再加密类型的实现和性能评估","authors":"Pance Ribarski, Ljupcho Antovski","doi":"10.2498/cit.1002101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The anonymous channels have been the essence of numerous protocols that include anonymous message passing between peers. The mixnet structure is one way to accomplish the anonymity. Since the publication of the Chaumian mixnet, there have been many practical implementations. There are two main approaches to implement mixnets: the decryption (Chaumian) and the re-encryption mixnets. In this paper we analyze four types of mixnets, from which one decryption and three re-encryption types. They were implemented in the Java programing language and evaluated on several criterias as: the number of messages, the total number of nodes, the number of threshold nodes, and the key length of underlying crypto system. In the results section we compare the results from the practical tests to answer the research question, which type of mixnets has better features.","PeriodicalId":135105,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ITI 2012 34th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mixnets: Implementation and performance evaluation of decryption and re-encryption types\",\"authors\":\"Pance Ribarski, Ljupcho Antovski\",\"doi\":\"10.2498/cit.1002101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The anonymous channels have been the essence of numerous protocols that include anonymous message passing between peers. The mixnet structure is one way to accomplish the anonymity. Since the publication of the Chaumian mixnet, there have been many practical implementations. There are two main approaches to implement mixnets: the decryption (Chaumian) and the re-encryption mixnets. In this paper we analyze four types of mixnets, from which one decryption and three re-encryption types. They were implemented in the Java programing language and evaluated on several criterias as: the number of messages, the total number of nodes, the number of threshold nodes, and the key length of underlying crypto system. In the results section we compare the results from the practical tests to answer the research question, which type of mixnets has better features.\",\"PeriodicalId\":135105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the ITI 2012 34th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the ITI 2012 34th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2498/cit.1002101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ITI 2012 34th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2498/cit.1002101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

匿名通道一直是许多协议的本质,这些协议包括在对等点之间传递匿名消息。mixnet结构是实现匿名的一种方法。自从Chaumian mixnet发布以来,已经有了许多实际的实现。有两种实现mixnets的主要方法:解密(Chaumian)和重新加密mixnets。本文分析了四种类型的混合网络,其中有一种解密类型和三种再加密类型。它们是用Java编程语言实现的,并根据以下几个标准进行评估:消息数量、节点总数、阈值节点数量和底层加密系统的密钥长度。在结果部分,我们比较了实际测试的结果,以回答研究问题,哪种类型的mixnets具有更好的功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mixnets: Implementation and performance evaluation of decryption and re-encryption types
The anonymous channels have been the essence of numerous protocols that include anonymous message passing between peers. The mixnet structure is one way to accomplish the anonymity. Since the publication of the Chaumian mixnet, there have been many practical implementations. There are two main approaches to implement mixnets: the decryption (Chaumian) and the re-encryption mixnets. In this paper we analyze four types of mixnets, from which one decryption and three re-encryption types. They were implemented in the Java programing language and evaluated on several criterias as: the number of messages, the total number of nodes, the number of threshold nodes, and the key length of underlying crypto system. In the results section we compare the results from the practical tests to answer the research question, which type of mixnets has better features.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信