CodeShovel:构建方法级源代码历史

F. Grund, S. Chowdhury, N. Bradley, Braxton Hall, Reid Holmes
{"title":"CodeShovel:构建方法级源代码历史","authors":"F. Grund, S. Chowdhury, N. Bradley, Braxton Hall, Reid Holmes","doi":"10.1109/ICSE43902.2021.00135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Source code histories are commonly used by developers and researchers to reason about how software evolves. Through a survey with 42 professional software developers, we learned that developers face significant mismatches between the output provided by developers' existing tools for examining source code histories and what they need to successfully complete their historical analysis tasks. To address these shortcomings, we propose CodeShovel, a tool for uncovering method histories that quickly produces complete and accurate change histories for 90% methods (including 97% of all method changes) outperforming leading tools from both research (e.g, FinerGit) and practice (e.g., IntelliJ / git log). CodeShovel helps developers to navigate the entire history of source code methods so they can better understand how the method evolved. A field study on industrial code bases with 16 industrial developers confirmed our empirical findings of CodeShovel's correctness, low runtime overheads, and additionally showed that the approach can be useful for a wide range of industrial development tasks.","PeriodicalId":305167,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CodeShovel: Constructing Method-Level Source Code Histories\",\"authors\":\"F. Grund, S. Chowdhury, N. Bradley, Braxton Hall, Reid Holmes\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSE43902.2021.00135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Source code histories are commonly used by developers and researchers to reason about how software evolves. Through a survey with 42 professional software developers, we learned that developers face significant mismatches between the output provided by developers' existing tools for examining source code histories and what they need to successfully complete their historical analysis tasks. To address these shortcomings, we propose CodeShovel, a tool for uncovering method histories that quickly produces complete and accurate change histories for 90% methods (including 97% of all method changes) outperforming leading tools from both research (e.g, FinerGit) and practice (e.g., IntelliJ / git log). CodeShovel helps developers to navigate the entire history of source code methods so they can better understand how the method evolved. A field study on industrial code bases with 16 industrial developers confirmed our empirical findings of CodeShovel's correctness, low runtime overheads, and additionally showed that the approach can be useful for a wide range of industrial development tasks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":305167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE43902.2021.00135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE43902.2021.00135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

开发人员和研究人员通常使用源代码历史来推断软件是如何发展的。通过对42名专业软件开发人员的调查,我们了解到开发人员面临着由开发人员用于检查源代码历史的现有工具提供的输出与他们成功完成历史分析任务所需的输出之间的严重不匹配。为了解决这些缺点,我们提出了CodeShovel,一个用于发现方法历史的工具,它可以快速生成90%方法(包括所有方法更改的97%)的完整和准确的变更历史,优于研究(例如FinerGit)和实践(例如IntelliJ / git log)中的领先工具。CodeShovel帮助开发人员浏览源代码方法的整个历史,以便他们能够更好地理解方法是如何演变的。对16个工业开发人员的工业代码库的实地研究证实了我们的经验发现,即CodeShovel的正确性、低运行时开销,并且还表明该方法可用于广泛的工业开发任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CodeShovel: Constructing Method-Level Source Code Histories
Source code histories are commonly used by developers and researchers to reason about how software evolves. Through a survey with 42 professional software developers, we learned that developers face significant mismatches between the output provided by developers' existing tools for examining source code histories and what they need to successfully complete their historical analysis tasks. To address these shortcomings, we propose CodeShovel, a tool for uncovering method histories that quickly produces complete and accurate change histories for 90% methods (including 97% of all method changes) outperforming leading tools from both research (e.g, FinerGit) and practice (e.g., IntelliJ / git log). CodeShovel helps developers to navigate the entire history of source code methods so they can better understand how the method evolved. A field study on industrial code bases with 16 industrial developers confirmed our empirical findings of CodeShovel's correctness, low runtime overheads, and additionally showed that the approach can be useful for a wide range of industrial development tasks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信