{"title":"汉斯·凯尔森作为提纲:激进规范理论的辩护","authors":"S. Paulson","doi":"10.36280/afpifs.2021.4.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his first treatise on legal theory, Hauptprobleme der Staatsrechtslehre (1911), Hans Kelsen seeks to recast legal norm theory in a way that would eliminate from the theory the imperative, with what Kelsen sees as its moral connotations. The result, Kelsen’s sanction theory, is not entirely successful. It leaves in place the imperative vis-à-vis legal officials, with obligations imposed on officials to implement sanctions. In the 1930s, Kelsen returns to the issue, radically recasting legal norm theory by introducing empowerment as the fundamental modality and obligation as merely derivative, a view that prevails in the second edition of the Reine Rechtslehre (1960).","PeriodicalId":179034,"journal":{"name":"Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hans Kelsen as Outliner: The Defence of a Radical Norm Theory\",\"authors\":\"S. Paulson\",\"doi\":\"10.36280/afpifs.2021.4.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In his first treatise on legal theory, Hauptprobleme der Staatsrechtslehre (1911), Hans Kelsen seeks to recast legal norm theory in a way that would eliminate from the theory the imperative, with what Kelsen sees as its moral connotations. The result, Kelsen’s sanction theory, is not entirely successful. It leaves in place the imperative vis-à-vis legal officials, with obligations imposed on officials to implement sanctions. In the 1930s, Kelsen returns to the issue, radically recasting legal norm theory by introducing empowerment as the fundamental modality and obligation as merely derivative, a view that prevails in the second edition of the Reine Rechtslehre (1960).\",\"PeriodicalId\":179034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2021.4.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36280/afpifs.2021.4.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
在他关于法律理论的第一篇论文《国家问题》(Hauptprobleme der Staatsrechtslehre, 1911)中,汉斯·凯尔森(Hans Kelsen)试图以一种方式重塑法律规范理论,将命令从理论中剔除,并将其视为道德内涵。结果,凯尔森的制裁理论并不完全成功。它保留了对-à-vis法律官员的必要性,并规定了官员执行制裁的义务。在20世纪30年代,Kelsen回到了这个问题,从根本上重新塑造了法律规范理论,通过引入授权作为基本形式和义务仅仅是派生的,这一观点在Reine Rechtslehre(1960)第二版中盛行。
Hans Kelsen as Outliner: The Defence of a Radical Norm Theory
In his first treatise on legal theory, Hauptprobleme der Staatsrechtslehre (1911), Hans Kelsen seeks to recast legal norm theory in a way that would eliminate from the theory the imperative, with what Kelsen sees as its moral connotations. The result, Kelsen’s sanction theory, is not entirely successful. It leaves in place the imperative vis-à-vis legal officials, with obligations imposed on officials to implement sanctions. In the 1930s, Kelsen returns to the issue, radically recasting legal norm theory by introducing empowerment as the fundamental modality and obligation as merely derivative, a view that prevails in the second edition of the Reine Rechtslehre (1960).