在基于PBL的在线机器人竞赛中建立包容性:挑战和结果

Saraswathi Krithivasan, Saurav Shandilya, Sanam Shakya, K. Arya, Krishna Lala
{"title":"在基于PBL的在线机器人竞赛中建立包容性:挑战和结果","authors":"Saraswathi Krithivasan, Saurav Shandilya, Sanam Shakya, K. Arya, Krishna Lala","doi":"10.1109/LaTiCE.2016.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"e-Yantra conducts an annual online competition, e-Yantra Robotics Competition (eYRC) which incorporates a Project-Based Learning (PBL) methodology to train students to implement a robotics project in a step-by-step manner over a five month period. The competition is designed to provide all the resources - robot, accessories, and a project - to each participating team to make the competition accessible to students from the remotest parts of India. Every year the goal is to increase the number of participating teams selected through an online selection test. Even though multiple teams from a college qualify, we restrict the number of teams from a college to the number of unique \"Themes\" -- projects abstracted into rulebooks -- assigned in the competition. In eYRC-2013, 72 teams (out of 232 teams) who had qualified through the selection test could not be included in the competition, as we had only 5 unique Themes. In 2014, we started a parallel competition, eYRC+ Pilot to include all the qualifying teams. In this paper we describe the methodology used in this competition where we experimented with a Theme involving an advanced topic -- Image Processing - such that we could assign the same theme to more number of teams. Our analysis of performance of teams show that contrary to our hypothesis, the learning outcomes of teams in the various tasks assigned in the competition are comparable to that of teams participated in the eYRC themes. Analyzing the effectiveness of the competition in imparting PBL, based on feedback received from the teams, we find that eYRC+ is as effective as eYRC. We present our analysis and how we have applied it in the current edition of the competition eYRC-2015.","PeriodicalId":281941,"journal":{"name":"2016 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building Inclusiveness in a PBL Based Online Robotics Competition: Challenges and Outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Saraswathi Krithivasan, Saurav Shandilya, Sanam Shakya, K. Arya, Krishna Lala\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LaTiCE.2016.39\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"e-Yantra conducts an annual online competition, e-Yantra Robotics Competition (eYRC) which incorporates a Project-Based Learning (PBL) methodology to train students to implement a robotics project in a step-by-step manner over a five month period. The competition is designed to provide all the resources - robot, accessories, and a project - to each participating team to make the competition accessible to students from the remotest parts of India. Every year the goal is to increase the number of participating teams selected through an online selection test. Even though multiple teams from a college qualify, we restrict the number of teams from a college to the number of unique \\\"Themes\\\" -- projects abstracted into rulebooks -- assigned in the competition. In eYRC-2013, 72 teams (out of 232 teams) who had qualified through the selection test could not be included in the competition, as we had only 5 unique Themes. In 2014, we started a parallel competition, eYRC+ Pilot to include all the qualifying teams. In this paper we describe the methodology used in this competition where we experimented with a Theme involving an advanced topic -- Image Processing - such that we could assign the same theme to more number of teams. Our analysis of performance of teams show that contrary to our hypothesis, the learning outcomes of teams in the various tasks assigned in the competition are comparable to that of teams participated in the eYRC themes. Analyzing the effectiveness of the competition in imparting PBL, based on feedback received from the teams, we find that eYRC+ is as effective as eYRC. We present our analysis and how we have applied it in the current edition of the competition eYRC-2015.\",\"PeriodicalId\":281941,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2016.39\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2016.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

e-Yantra每年举办一次在线竞赛,e-Yantra机器人竞赛(eYRC),其中包括基于项目的学习(PBL)方法,以训练学生在五个月的时间内逐步实施机器人项目。比赛的目的是为每个参赛队伍提供所有资源——机器人、配件和一个项目,使来自印度最偏远地区的学生也能参加比赛。每年的目标是通过在线选拔测试来增加参赛队伍的数量。即使来自一个学院的多个团队都有资格,我们也会将来自一个学院的团队数量限制为独特的“主题”(抽象到规则手册中的项目)的数量。在eYRC-2013中,由于我们只有5个独特的主题,通过选拔测试合格的72支队伍(232支队伍中)无法参加比赛。2014年,我们启动了一个平行的比赛,eYRC+ Pilot,包括所有合格的团队。在本文中,我们描述了在本次比赛中使用的方法,我们实验了一个涉及高级主题的主题-图像处理-这样我们就可以将相同的主题分配给更多的团队。我们对团队表现的分析表明,与我们的假设相反,团队在比赛中分配的各种任务中的学习成果与参加eYRC主题的团队相当。基于团队反馈,我们分析了竞赛对PBL传授的有效性,发现eYRC+与eYRC一样有效。我们将介绍我们的分析以及我们如何将其应用于当前版本的eYRC-2015竞赛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Building Inclusiveness in a PBL Based Online Robotics Competition: Challenges and Outcomes
e-Yantra conducts an annual online competition, e-Yantra Robotics Competition (eYRC) which incorporates a Project-Based Learning (PBL) methodology to train students to implement a robotics project in a step-by-step manner over a five month period. The competition is designed to provide all the resources - robot, accessories, and a project - to each participating team to make the competition accessible to students from the remotest parts of India. Every year the goal is to increase the number of participating teams selected through an online selection test. Even though multiple teams from a college qualify, we restrict the number of teams from a college to the number of unique "Themes" -- projects abstracted into rulebooks -- assigned in the competition. In eYRC-2013, 72 teams (out of 232 teams) who had qualified through the selection test could not be included in the competition, as we had only 5 unique Themes. In 2014, we started a parallel competition, eYRC+ Pilot to include all the qualifying teams. In this paper we describe the methodology used in this competition where we experimented with a Theme involving an advanced topic -- Image Processing - such that we could assign the same theme to more number of teams. Our analysis of performance of teams show that contrary to our hypothesis, the learning outcomes of teams in the various tasks assigned in the competition are comparable to that of teams participated in the eYRC themes. Analyzing the effectiveness of the competition in imparting PBL, based on feedback received from the teams, we find that eYRC+ is as effective as eYRC. We present our analysis and how we have applied it in the current edition of the competition eYRC-2015.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信