在一个陌生的岛屿上:斯里兰卡人对放逐与归属的回顾罗尼特·利玛奇:《放逐与归属:萨兰迪布、斯里兰卡和锡兰的流亡与流散》。剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2019。2020年南亚第一届。296页。

Alexander McKinley
{"title":"在一个陌生的岛屿上:斯里兰卡人对放逐与归属的回顾罗尼特·利玛奇:《放逐与归属:萨兰迪布、斯里兰卡和锡兰的流亡与流散》。剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2019。2020年南亚第一届。296页。","authors":"Alexander McKinley","doi":"10.4038/sljh.v43i1.7264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past two decades, historiography of Southern Asia has increasingly looked to the sea. This has yielded a robust sub-field of “Indian Ocean Studies,” illuminating cultural connections and exchanges over borders and boundaries, and emphasizing mobility across wind and wave as a means to think past “area studies” and other colonially inherited categories and conceptions of space. 1 Ronit Ricci’s recent book, Banishment and Belonging: Exile and Diaspora in Sarandib, Lanka, and Ceylon, represents the best fruits of such oceanic studies, tracking Javanese and Malay literary movements back and forth across the greater archipelago of the southern seas. In this way, the book takes Malay texts and people beyond the nationalized boundaries of “Malaysia,” moving over a number of island worlds, including Bali, Borneo, Java, Sulawesi, Sumatra, and of course Sri Lanka, the subtitle of the book indicating its importance in Malay imaginations of homeland and exile. While writing Malays into Sri Lankan history, Ricci acknowledges that she is not trained as a Sri Lankanist. Oceanic studies broadly conceived ultimately runs up against a scholar’s linguistic limits. So while Ricci’s analysis of Javanese and Malay sources is highly nuanced, she is unable to access local Lankan texts in the same first-hand manner to corroborate her argument.","PeriodicalId":436260,"journal":{"name":"Sri Lanka Journal of the Humanities","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On an Unfamiliar Island: A Sri Lankanist Review of Banishment and Belonging; Review Essay of: Ronit Ricci, Banishment and Belonging: Exile and Diaspora in Sarandib, Lanka, and Ceylon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. First South Asia edition 2020. 296 pp.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander McKinley\",\"doi\":\"10.4038/sljh.v43i1.7264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the past two decades, historiography of Southern Asia has increasingly looked to the sea. This has yielded a robust sub-field of “Indian Ocean Studies,” illuminating cultural connections and exchanges over borders and boundaries, and emphasizing mobility across wind and wave as a means to think past “area studies” and other colonially inherited categories and conceptions of space. 1 Ronit Ricci’s recent book, Banishment and Belonging: Exile and Diaspora in Sarandib, Lanka, and Ceylon, represents the best fruits of such oceanic studies, tracking Javanese and Malay literary movements back and forth across the greater archipelago of the southern seas. In this way, the book takes Malay texts and people beyond the nationalized boundaries of “Malaysia,” moving over a number of island worlds, including Bali, Borneo, Java, Sulawesi, Sumatra, and of course Sri Lanka, the subtitle of the book indicating its importance in Malay imaginations of homeland and exile. While writing Malays into Sri Lankan history, Ricci acknowledges that she is not trained as a Sri Lankanist. Oceanic studies broadly conceived ultimately runs up against a scholar’s linguistic limits. So while Ricci’s analysis of Javanese and Malay sources is highly nuanced, she is unable to access local Lankan texts in the same first-hand manner to corroborate her argument.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sri Lanka Journal of the Humanities\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sri Lanka Journal of the Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4038/sljh.v43i1.7264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sri Lanka Journal of the Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/sljh.v43i1.7264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的二十年里,南亚的史学越来越关注海洋。这产生了一个强大的“印度洋研究”子领域,阐明了跨越国界和边界的文化联系和交流,并强调了跨越风浪的流动性,作为思考过去“区域研究”和其他殖民继承的空间类别和概念的一种手段。罗尼特·里奇的新书《放逐与归属:萨兰地、兰卡和锡兰的流亡与散居》是这类海洋研究的最佳成果,该书追踪了爪哇和马来文学在南部海域大群岛上的来回运动。通过这种方式,这本书将马来文本和人民带出了“马来西亚”的国家化边界,跨越了许多岛屿世界,包括巴厘岛、婆罗洲、爪哇、苏拉威西岛、苏门答腊,当然还有斯里兰卡,这本书的副标题表明了它在马来人对家园和流亡的想象中的重要性。在将马来人写进斯里兰卡历史的同时,利玛窦承认她并没有被训练成斯里兰卡人。广义的大洋研究最终会遇到学者的语言局限。因此,虽然利玛窦对爪哇语和马来语资料的分析非常细致入微,但她无法以同样第一手的方式获取当地的斯里兰卡语文本来证实她的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On an Unfamiliar Island: A Sri Lankanist Review of Banishment and Belonging; Review Essay of: Ronit Ricci, Banishment and Belonging: Exile and Diaspora in Sarandib, Lanka, and Ceylon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. First South Asia edition 2020. 296 pp.
Over the past two decades, historiography of Southern Asia has increasingly looked to the sea. This has yielded a robust sub-field of “Indian Ocean Studies,” illuminating cultural connections and exchanges over borders and boundaries, and emphasizing mobility across wind and wave as a means to think past “area studies” and other colonially inherited categories and conceptions of space. 1 Ronit Ricci’s recent book, Banishment and Belonging: Exile and Diaspora in Sarandib, Lanka, and Ceylon, represents the best fruits of such oceanic studies, tracking Javanese and Malay literary movements back and forth across the greater archipelago of the southern seas. In this way, the book takes Malay texts and people beyond the nationalized boundaries of “Malaysia,” moving over a number of island worlds, including Bali, Borneo, Java, Sulawesi, Sumatra, and of course Sri Lanka, the subtitle of the book indicating its importance in Malay imaginations of homeland and exile. While writing Malays into Sri Lankan history, Ricci acknowledges that she is not trained as a Sri Lankanist. Oceanic studies broadly conceived ultimately runs up against a scholar’s linguistic limits. So while Ricci’s analysis of Javanese and Malay sources is highly nuanced, she is unable to access local Lankan texts in the same first-hand manner to corroborate her argument.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信