{"title":"对症状不可逆牙髓炎单根牙行超声振动冲洗与常规注射器冲洗术后疼痛的评价:一项随机临床对照试验","authors":"Sara Ahmed, Heba Elfar, Sherief El Khodary","doi":"10.21608/adjc.2019.17020.1031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study was to clinically compare the postoperative pain after Vibringe sonic irrigation system and conventional needle irrigation during root canal treatment in single-rooted teeth . Methods: A total of 18 patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in need of nonsurgical endodontic retreatment were randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 9) . Patients were carefully diagnosed and checked for the eligibility criteria . Irrigation in (group A) was delivered and sonically activated by Vibringe and Irrigation in (group B) was done using conventional needle. The presence of postoperative pain was assessed 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after treatment according to the NRS where; 0; No pain, 1-3; mild pain, 4-6; moderate pain, 7-10; severe pain “severe pain, analgesic had no effect in relieving the pain”. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U,Friedman’s test, and Fisher’s Exact tests. Results: Postoperative pain was non significantly different in the Vibringe group in comparison with the conventional needle group (P >.05) on all time intervals “ 6 -12-24 and 48 hours” (P-value = 0.753) . Pain scores from base line to 6 hours post-operatively showed statistically significant decrease in both Vibringe and Conventional needle irrigation group (P-value <0.001). Conclusions: The sonically activated Vibringe irrigation system and conventional needle irrigation are equally safe with low incidence of post-operative at 6, 12 , 24 and 48 hours intervals.","PeriodicalId":140501,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Dental Journal","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation Of Postoperative Pain After Using Sonic Vibringe Irrigation System Versus Conventional syringe irrigation In Single Rooted Teeth With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis : A Randomized Clinical Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"Sara Ahmed, Heba Elfar, Sherief El Khodary\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/adjc.2019.17020.1031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The aim of this study was to clinically compare the postoperative pain after Vibringe sonic irrigation system and conventional needle irrigation during root canal treatment in single-rooted teeth . Methods: A total of 18 patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in need of nonsurgical endodontic retreatment were randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 9) . Patients were carefully diagnosed and checked for the eligibility criteria . Irrigation in (group A) was delivered and sonically activated by Vibringe and Irrigation in (group B) was done using conventional needle. The presence of postoperative pain was assessed 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after treatment according to the NRS where; 0; No pain, 1-3; mild pain, 4-6; moderate pain, 7-10; severe pain “severe pain, analgesic had no effect in relieving the pain”. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U,Friedman’s test, and Fisher’s Exact tests. Results: Postoperative pain was non significantly different in the Vibringe group in comparison with the conventional needle group (P >.05) on all time intervals “ 6 -12-24 and 48 hours” (P-value = 0.753) . Pain scores from base line to 6 hours post-operatively showed statistically significant decrease in both Vibringe and Conventional needle irrigation group (P-value <0.001). Conclusions: The sonically activated Vibringe irrigation system and conventional needle irrigation are equally safe with low incidence of post-operative at 6, 12 , 24 and 48 hours intervals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":140501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjc.2019.17020.1031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjc.2019.17020.1031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation Of Postoperative Pain After Using Sonic Vibringe Irrigation System Versus Conventional syringe irrigation In Single Rooted Teeth With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis : A Randomized Clinical Controlled Trial
Aim: The aim of this study was to clinically compare the postoperative pain after Vibringe sonic irrigation system and conventional needle irrigation during root canal treatment in single-rooted teeth . Methods: A total of 18 patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in need of nonsurgical endodontic retreatment were randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 9) . Patients were carefully diagnosed and checked for the eligibility criteria . Irrigation in (group A) was delivered and sonically activated by Vibringe and Irrigation in (group B) was done using conventional needle. The presence of postoperative pain was assessed 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after treatment according to the NRS where; 0; No pain, 1-3; mild pain, 4-6; moderate pain, 7-10; severe pain “severe pain, analgesic had no effect in relieving the pain”. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U,Friedman’s test, and Fisher’s Exact tests. Results: Postoperative pain was non significantly different in the Vibringe group in comparison with the conventional needle group (P >.05) on all time intervals “ 6 -12-24 and 48 hours” (P-value = 0.753) . Pain scores from base line to 6 hours post-operatively showed statistically significant decrease in both Vibringe and Conventional needle irrigation group (P-value <0.001). Conclusions: The sonically activated Vibringe irrigation system and conventional needle irrigation are equally safe with low incidence of post-operative at 6, 12 , 24 and 48 hours intervals.