{"title":"运用想象力作为认知工具","authors":"Kristina Veinbender","doi":"10.17846/pc.2020.6.2.30-42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research question of the paper is whether we can acquire knowledge by using our imagination. I work with later Wittgenstein’s thesis according to which there is a difference between ordinary and philosophical doubt, I call them local and global doubts. According to Wittgenstein, philosophical doubt is not rooted in any language game, since it doubts something undoubtable. In a similar way, I distinguish local and global imagining suggesting only the local one can bring a piece of knowledge. In the last part of the paper I search for scientific evidence for my thesis and conclude that only particular examples help us to learn or predict our future experience.","PeriodicalId":166511,"journal":{"name":"Philosophica Critica","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Imagination as an Epistemic Tool\",\"authors\":\"Kristina Veinbender\",\"doi\":\"10.17846/pc.2020.6.2.30-42\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The research question of the paper is whether we can acquire knowledge by using our imagination. I work with later Wittgenstein’s thesis according to which there is a difference between ordinary and philosophical doubt, I call them local and global doubts. According to Wittgenstein, philosophical doubt is not rooted in any language game, since it doubts something undoubtable. In a similar way, I distinguish local and global imagining suggesting only the local one can bring a piece of knowledge. In the last part of the paper I search for scientific evidence for my thesis and conclude that only particular examples help us to learn or predict our future experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophica Critica\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophica Critica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17846/pc.2020.6.2.30-42\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophica Critica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17846/pc.2020.6.2.30-42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The research question of the paper is whether we can acquire knowledge by using our imagination. I work with later Wittgenstein’s thesis according to which there is a difference between ordinary and philosophical doubt, I call them local and global doubts. According to Wittgenstein, philosophical doubt is not rooted in any language game, since it doubts something undoubtable. In a similar way, I distinguish local and global imagining suggesting only the local one can bring a piece of knowledge. In the last part of the paper I search for scientific evidence for my thesis and conclude that only particular examples help us to learn or predict our future experience.