层状材料模型的比较研究

MAM@EGSR Pub Date : 2019-07-09 DOI:10.2312/mam.20191307
Mégane Bati, R. Pacanowski, Pascal Barla
{"title":"层状材料模型的比较研究","authors":"Mégane Bati, R. Pacanowski, Pascal Barla","doi":"10.2312/mam.20191307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The accurate reproduction of layered materials is an important part of physically-based rendering applications. \nSince no exact analytical model exists for any configuration of layer stacks, available models make approximations. \nIn this paper, we propose to evaluate them with a numerical approach: we simulate BRDFs and BTDFs for layered materials in order to compare existing models against a common reference. \nWe show that: (1) no single model always outperforms the others and (2) significant differences remain between simulated and modeled materials. \nWe analyse the reasons for these discrepancies and introduce immediate corrections.","PeriodicalId":370574,"journal":{"name":"MAM@EGSR","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Layered Material Models\",\"authors\":\"Mégane Bati, R. Pacanowski, Pascal Barla\",\"doi\":\"10.2312/mam.20191307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The accurate reproduction of layered materials is an important part of physically-based rendering applications. \\nSince no exact analytical model exists for any configuration of layer stacks, available models make approximations. \\nIn this paper, we propose to evaluate them with a numerical approach: we simulate BRDFs and BTDFs for layered materials in order to compare existing models against a common reference. \\nWe show that: (1) no single model always outperforms the others and (2) significant differences remain between simulated and modeled materials. \\nWe analyse the reasons for these discrepancies and introduce immediate corrections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MAM@EGSR\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MAM@EGSR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2312/mam.20191307\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MAM@EGSR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2312/mam.20191307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

分层材料的精确再现是基于物理的渲染应用程序的重要组成部分。由于不存在任何层栈结构的精确解析模型,可用的模型都是近似的。在本文中,我们建议用数值方法来评估它们:我们模拟了层状材料的brdf和btdf,以便将现有模型与共同参考进行比较。我们表明:(1)没有一个模型总是优于其他模型;(2)模拟和建模材料之间仍然存在显着差异。我们分析这些差异的原因,并提出立即纠正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study of Layered Material Models
The accurate reproduction of layered materials is an important part of physically-based rendering applications. Since no exact analytical model exists for any configuration of layer stacks, available models make approximations. In this paper, we propose to evaluate them with a numerical approach: we simulate BRDFs and BTDFs for layered materials in order to compare existing models against a common reference. We show that: (1) no single model always outperforms the others and (2) significant differences remain between simulated and modeled materials. We analyse the reasons for these discrepancies and introduce immediate corrections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信