{"title":"层状材料模型的比较研究","authors":"Mégane Bati, R. Pacanowski, Pascal Barla","doi":"10.2312/mam.20191307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The accurate reproduction of layered materials is an important part of physically-based rendering applications. \nSince no exact analytical model exists for any configuration of layer stacks, available models make approximations. \nIn this paper, we propose to evaluate them with a numerical approach: we simulate BRDFs and BTDFs for layered materials in order to compare existing models against a common reference. \nWe show that: (1) no single model always outperforms the others and (2) significant differences remain between simulated and modeled materials. \nWe analyse the reasons for these discrepancies and introduce immediate corrections.","PeriodicalId":370574,"journal":{"name":"MAM@EGSR","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Layered Material Models\",\"authors\":\"Mégane Bati, R. Pacanowski, Pascal Barla\",\"doi\":\"10.2312/mam.20191307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The accurate reproduction of layered materials is an important part of physically-based rendering applications. \\nSince no exact analytical model exists for any configuration of layer stacks, available models make approximations. \\nIn this paper, we propose to evaluate them with a numerical approach: we simulate BRDFs and BTDFs for layered materials in order to compare existing models against a common reference. \\nWe show that: (1) no single model always outperforms the others and (2) significant differences remain between simulated and modeled materials. \\nWe analyse the reasons for these discrepancies and introduce immediate corrections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MAM@EGSR\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MAM@EGSR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2312/mam.20191307\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MAM@EGSR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2312/mam.20191307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The accurate reproduction of layered materials is an important part of physically-based rendering applications.
Since no exact analytical model exists for any configuration of layer stacks, available models make approximations.
In this paper, we propose to evaluate them with a numerical approach: we simulate BRDFs and BTDFs for layered materials in order to compare existing models against a common reference.
We show that: (1) no single model always outperforms the others and (2) significant differences remain between simulated and modeled materials.
We analyse the reasons for these discrepancies and introduce immediate corrections.