《欧洲法律研究的政治:方法背后》,玛丽亚·巴特尔、杰西卡·c·劳伦斯主编。

Branka Marušić
{"title":"《欧洲法律研究的政治:方法背后》,玛丽亚·巴特尔、杰西卡·c·劳伦斯主编。","authors":"Branka Marušić","doi":"10.3935/cyelp.18.2022.474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The first thing that strikes the reader of The Politics of European Legal Research: Behind the Method is the narrative of the structure. A mere glance at the contents page promises the reader that the discussion will be viewed through four perspectives: the politics of questions, the politics of answers, the politics of audiences, and the politics of the concept of law. Although the reader might be enticed by this grouping and expect an overarching chapter for each perspective, this expectation falls short. Nevertheless, the grouping of the discussion in the aforementioned four focal points and then delivering different perspectives under these focal points is a most welcome contribution to the recent method debates.","PeriodicalId":137938,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: The Politics of European Legal Research: Behind the Method, Marija Bartl and Jessica C. Lawrence (eds)\",\"authors\":\"Branka Marušić\",\"doi\":\"10.3935/cyelp.18.2022.474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The first thing that strikes the reader of The Politics of European Legal Research: Behind the Method is the narrative of the structure. A mere glance at the contents page promises the reader that the discussion will be viewed through four perspectives: the politics of questions, the politics of answers, the politics of audiences, and the politics of the concept of law. Although the reader might be enticed by this grouping and expect an overarching chapter for each perspective, this expectation falls short. Nevertheless, the grouping of the discussion in the aforementioned four focal points and then delivering different perspectives under these focal points is a most welcome contribution to the recent method debates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.18.2022.474\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.18.2022.474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《欧洲法律研究的政治:方法的背后》首先给读者留下深刻印象的是结构叙事。只要扫一眼目录页,读者就会发现讨论将从四个角度进行:问题的政治、答案的政治、受众的政治和法律概念的政治。尽管读者可能会被这种分组所吸引,并期望每个视角都有一个概括性的章节,但这种期望是不够的。然而,将讨论集中在上述四个焦点上,然后在这些焦点下提出不同的观点,是对最近的方法辩论的最受欢迎的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book Review: The Politics of European Legal Research: Behind the Method, Marija Bartl and Jessica C. Lawrence (eds)
The first thing that strikes the reader of The Politics of European Legal Research: Behind the Method is the narrative of the structure. A mere glance at the contents page promises the reader that the discussion will be viewed through four perspectives: the politics of questions, the politics of answers, the politics of audiences, and the politics of the concept of law. Although the reader might be enticed by this grouping and expect an overarching chapter for each perspective, this expectation falls short. Nevertheless, the grouping of the discussion in the aforementioned four focal points and then delivering different perspectives under these focal points is a most welcome contribution to the recent method debates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信