标准模型中的一轮密钥交换

C. Boyd, Y. Cliff, J. G. Nieto, K. Paterson
{"title":"标准模型中的一轮密钥交换","authors":"C. Boyd, Y. Cliff, J. G. Nieto, K. Paterson","doi":"10.1504/IJACT.2009.023466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider one-round key exchange protocols secure in the standard model. The security analysis uses the powerful security model of Canetti and Krawczyk and a natural extension of it to the ID-based setting. It is shown how Key-Encapsulation Mechanisms (KEMs) can be used in a generic way to obtain two different protocol designs with progressively stronger security guarantees. A detailed analysis of the performance of the protocols is included; surprisingly, when instantiated with specific KEM constructions, the resulting protocols are competitive with the best previous schemes that have proofs only in the Random Oracle Model.","PeriodicalId":350332,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Appl. Cryptogr.","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"40","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One-round key exchange in the standard model\",\"authors\":\"C. Boyd, Y. Cliff, J. G. Nieto, K. Paterson\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJACT.2009.023466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider one-round key exchange protocols secure in the standard model. The security analysis uses the powerful security model of Canetti and Krawczyk and a natural extension of it to the ID-based setting. It is shown how Key-Encapsulation Mechanisms (KEMs) can be used in a generic way to obtain two different protocol designs with progressively stronger security guarantees. A detailed analysis of the performance of the protocols is included; surprisingly, when instantiated with specific KEM constructions, the resulting protocols are competitive with the best previous schemes that have proofs only in the Random Oracle Model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":350332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Appl. Cryptogr.\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"40\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Appl. Cryptogr.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJACT.2009.023466\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Appl. Cryptogr.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJACT.2009.023466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

摘要

我们认为一轮密钥交换协议在标准模型中是安全的。安全性分析使用了Canetti和Krawczyk强大的安全性模型,并将其自然扩展到基于id的设置。本文展示了如何以一种通用的方式使用密钥封装机制(Key-Encapsulation Mechanisms, kem)来获得两种不同的协议设计,这些协议设计具有越来越强的安全保证。详细分析了协议的性能;令人惊讶的是,当使用特定的KEM结构实例化时,生成的协议与之前仅在随机Oracle模型中有证明的最佳方案竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
One-round key exchange in the standard model
We consider one-round key exchange protocols secure in the standard model. The security analysis uses the powerful security model of Canetti and Krawczyk and a natural extension of it to the ID-based setting. It is shown how Key-Encapsulation Mechanisms (KEMs) can be used in a generic way to obtain two different protocol designs with progressively stronger security guarantees. A detailed analysis of the performance of the protocols is included; surprisingly, when instantiated with specific KEM constructions, the resulting protocols are competitive with the best previous schemes that have proofs only in the Random Oracle Model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信