韩国vs意大利:为什么文化对保持国家竞争力很重要

I. Oh
{"title":"韩国vs意大利:为什么文化对保持国家竞争力很重要","authors":"I. Oh","doi":"10.32860/26356619/2019/2.2.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to illustrate why culture is important in explaining both the rise and fall of a country’s competitiveness. I want to show why Korea’s competitiveness has been on the rise, whereas Italy’s has been declining over the years using culture as an important explanatory variable. This paper utilizes primary and secondary data on national GDP and competitiveness in order to analyze macro and micro factors of rising or declining competitiveness. Simultaneously, this paper uses qualitative cultural analysis to fill the gap the economic data has created. Significant cultural differences between modern and postmodern Catholicism (Italy) and Confucianism (Korea) explain why Korea was more competitive than Italy in the manufacturing and cultural sectors in the 21st century. Few extant studies exist that compare Italy and Korea, as they didn’t seem to be similar or comparable. However, it is simply appalling to see Korea’s excellent track record of competitiveness that has actually outstripped Italy, which is a G7 member. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 10 June 2019 Revised 23 June 2019 Accepted 24 June 2019","PeriodicalId":222854,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Empathy: International Journal of Sociology, Psychology, and Cultural Studies","volume":"189 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Korea vs. Italy: Why Culture is Important in Keeping your Country Competitive\",\"authors\":\"I. Oh\",\"doi\":\"10.32860/26356619/2019/2.2.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this paper is to illustrate why culture is important in explaining both the rise and fall of a country’s competitiveness. I want to show why Korea’s competitiveness has been on the rise, whereas Italy’s has been declining over the years using culture as an important explanatory variable. This paper utilizes primary and secondary data on national GDP and competitiveness in order to analyze macro and micro factors of rising or declining competitiveness. Simultaneously, this paper uses qualitative cultural analysis to fill the gap the economic data has created. Significant cultural differences between modern and postmodern Catholicism (Italy) and Confucianism (Korea) explain why Korea was more competitive than Italy in the manufacturing and cultural sectors in the 21st century. Few extant studies exist that compare Italy and Korea, as they didn’t seem to be similar or comparable. However, it is simply appalling to see Korea’s excellent track record of competitiveness that has actually outstripped Italy, which is a G7 member. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 10 June 2019 Revised 23 June 2019 Accepted 24 June 2019\",\"PeriodicalId\":222854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Culture and Empathy: International Journal of Sociology, Psychology, and Cultural Studies\",\"volume\":\"189 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Culture and Empathy: International Journal of Sociology, Psychology, and Cultural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32860/26356619/2019/2.2.0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture and Empathy: International Journal of Sociology, Psychology, and Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32860/26356619/2019/2.2.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是说明为什么文化在解释一个国家竞争力的上升和下降方面是重要的。我想用文化作为一个重要的解释变量来说明为什么韩国的竞争力一直在上升,而意大利的竞争力多年来一直在下降。本文利用各国国内生产总值和竞争力的一手和二手数据,分析影响竞争力上升或下降的宏观和微观因素。同时,本文利用定性文化分析来填补经济数据造成的空白。现代和后现代天主教(意大利)和儒教(韩国)之间的巨大文化差异解释了21世纪韩国在制造业和文化领域比意大利更具竞争力的原因。很少有现存的研究对意大利和韩国进行比较,因为它们似乎没有相似或可比性。但是,韩国的竞争力竟然超过了七国集团(G7)成员国意大利,真是令人震惊。文章历史2019年6月10日收稿2019年6月23日修订2019年6月24日接受
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Korea vs. Italy: Why Culture is Important in Keeping your Country Competitive
The purpose of this paper is to illustrate why culture is important in explaining both the rise and fall of a country’s competitiveness. I want to show why Korea’s competitiveness has been on the rise, whereas Italy’s has been declining over the years using culture as an important explanatory variable. This paper utilizes primary and secondary data on national GDP and competitiveness in order to analyze macro and micro factors of rising or declining competitiveness. Simultaneously, this paper uses qualitative cultural analysis to fill the gap the economic data has created. Significant cultural differences between modern and postmodern Catholicism (Italy) and Confucianism (Korea) explain why Korea was more competitive than Italy in the manufacturing and cultural sectors in the 21st century. Few extant studies exist that compare Italy and Korea, as they didn’t seem to be similar or comparable. However, it is simply appalling to see Korea’s excellent track record of competitiveness that has actually outstripped Italy, which is a G7 member. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 10 June 2019 Revised 23 June 2019 Accepted 24 June 2019
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信