力量与体能教练学生运动员满意度调查的编制

Megan Lynn Cottet, Michael G. Miller, Thomas A. Cappaert, Mitchel Schwartzman
{"title":"力量与体能教练学生运动员满意度调查的编制","authors":"Megan Lynn Cottet, Michael G. Miller, Thomas A. Cappaert, Mitchel Schwartzman","doi":"10.47206/ijsc.v2i1.143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to develop a valid and reliable survey for student-athletes to assess their satisfaction with their strength and conditioning coach (SCC) and the services they provide. This three-round Delphi Method study utilized experts to establish group consensus on survey items. Round one was completed by 28 experts, round two by 24 experts and round three by 22 experts. The Delphi Method resulted in the 32 item Strength and Conditioning Coach Student-Athlete Satisfaction Survey (SCC-SASS). Next, test-retest reliability was established by a sample (n=25) of student-athletes who were asked to complete the SCC-SASS twice, one to six days apart. The mean pre-test score was 126.62, and the post-test score was 126.04. A Two-Way Mixed Intra Class Correlation was run, resulting in an ICC of .956. Finally, Cronbach's alpha was calculated at an alpha value of .98. The results of these tests established the reliability of the SCC-SASS. This study led to the development of a valid and reliable survey to assess student-athlete satisfaction with their SCC and the services they provide. Knowing student-athlete satisfaction is important because student-athletes spend significant time with their SCC and higher athlete satisfaction is commonly associated with increased athletic performance. The development of this tool was vital to aid in assessing SCCs in hopes to further enhance the quality of the profession and the services and quality of care SCCs provide. \nKeywords: strength coach, college-age, quality improvement tool, group consensus, Delphi Method","PeriodicalId":170948,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Strength and Conditioning","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of the Strength and Conditioning Coach Student-Athlete Satisfaction Survey (SCC-SASS)\",\"authors\":\"Megan Lynn Cottet, Michael G. Miller, Thomas A. Cappaert, Mitchel Schwartzman\",\"doi\":\"10.47206/ijsc.v2i1.143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to develop a valid and reliable survey for student-athletes to assess their satisfaction with their strength and conditioning coach (SCC) and the services they provide. This three-round Delphi Method study utilized experts to establish group consensus on survey items. Round one was completed by 28 experts, round two by 24 experts and round three by 22 experts. The Delphi Method resulted in the 32 item Strength and Conditioning Coach Student-Athlete Satisfaction Survey (SCC-SASS). Next, test-retest reliability was established by a sample (n=25) of student-athletes who were asked to complete the SCC-SASS twice, one to six days apart. The mean pre-test score was 126.62, and the post-test score was 126.04. A Two-Way Mixed Intra Class Correlation was run, resulting in an ICC of .956. Finally, Cronbach's alpha was calculated at an alpha value of .98. The results of these tests established the reliability of the SCC-SASS. This study led to the development of a valid and reliable survey to assess student-athlete satisfaction with their SCC and the services they provide. Knowing student-athlete satisfaction is important because student-athletes spend significant time with their SCC and higher athlete satisfaction is commonly associated with increased athletic performance. The development of this tool was vital to aid in assessing SCCs in hopes to further enhance the quality of the profession and the services and quality of care SCCs provide. \\nKeywords: strength coach, college-age, quality improvement tool, group consensus, Delphi Method\",\"PeriodicalId\":170948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Strength and Conditioning\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Strength and Conditioning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v2i1.143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Strength and Conditioning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v2i1.143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究旨在为学生运动员提供一份有效且可靠的问卷调查,以评估他们对体能教练及其所提供服务的满意度。这个三轮德尔菲法研究利用专家对调查项目建立群体共识。第一轮由28位专家完成,第二轮由24位专家完成,第三轮由22位专家完成。采用德尔菲法编制了一份包含32个项目的力量与体能教练学生运动员满意度调查问卷。接下来,通过要求学生运动员两次(间隔一到六天)完成SCC-SASS的样本(n=25)来建立重测信度。前测平均分为126.62分,后测平均分为126.04分。运行双向混合类内相关性,得到ICC为0.956。最后,计算Cronbach's alpha值为0.98。这些测试的结果建立了SCC-SASS的可靠性。本研究开发了一项有效可靠的调查,以评估学生运动员对SCC及其提供的服务的满意度。了解学生运动员的满意度很重要,因为学生运动员在SCC上花费了大量时间,而更高的运动员满意度通常与运动成绩的提高有关。这一工具的开发对协助评估社区服务提供者至关重要,以期进一步提高社区服务提供者的专业素质以及提供的服务和护理质量。关键词:力量教练,大学生年龄,素质提升工具,群体共识,德尔菲法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of the Strength and Conditioning Coach Student-Athlete Satisfaction Survey (SCC-SASS)
The purpose of this study was to develop a valid and reliable survey for student-athletes to assess their satisfaction with their strength and conditioning coach (SCC) and the services they provide. This three-round Delphi Method study utilized experts to establish group consensus on survey items. Round one was completed by 28 experts, round two by 24 experts and round three by 22 experts. The Delphi Method resulted in the 32 item Strength and Conditioning Coach Student-Athlete Satisfaction Survey (SCC-SASS). Next, test-retest reliability was established by a sample (n=25) of student-athletes who were asked to complete the SCC-SASS twice, one to six days apart. The mean pre-test score was 126.62, and the post-test score was 126.04. A Two-Way Mixed Intra Class Correlation was run, resulting in an ICC of .956. Finally, Cronbach's alpha was calculated at an alpha value of .98. The results of these tests established the reliability of the SCC-SASS. This study led to the development of a valid and reliable survey to assess student-athlete satisfaction with their SCC and the services they provide. Knowing student-athlete satisfaction is important because student-athletes spend significant time with their SCC and higher athlete satisfaction is commonly associated with increased athletic performance. The development of this tool was vital to aid in assessing SCCs in hopes to further enhance the quality of the profession and the services and quality of care SCCs provide. Keywords: strength coach, college-age, quality improvement tool, group consensus, Delphi Method
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信