Enta Ismail Amet, Menekşe Seden Tapan-Broutin, G. Yılmaz
{"title":"Türkiye–Yunanistan Matematik Ders Kitaplarının Karşılaştırmalı Analizi: Pisagor Teoremi ve Temellendirilmesi Örneği","authors":"Enta Ismail Amet, Menekşe Seden Tapan-Broutin, G. Yılmaz","doi":"10.21733/IBADJOURNAL.584477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Geometry has a significant place within mathematics education beginning from early ages of childhood. It is obvious that comparative analysis results of textbooks, which are the fundamental guides of education, have substantial reflections such as detecting shortcomings and flaws, keeping the education up to date and processing mathematical concepts to make them integrable into education. Greek mathematicians have immense contributions in terms of laying the foundations of geometry. Therefore, including Greek textbooks in the comparative analysis was deemed important. The aim of this study is to compare the subjects of Pythagorean Theorem and how it is grounded between the mathematics textbooks of Turkey and Greece, and to reveal similarities and contrasts. Document analysis as a qualitative research method was applied in the study. Conducting content analysis on textbooks, findings of the comparative analysis of the books were coded and tabulated, and interpreted by combining shared themes. The results of the study revealed that the Greek textbook introduced planar surface areas, surface measurement units and area of plane figures before explaining the Pythagorean Theorem while the theorem itself was clarified by being proven through area formulas. The Turkish textbook, on the other hand, introduced median, altitude, angle bisector, side relationships, angle-side relationships in triangles and drawing triangles. The relationship between side lengths of the given right triangle and surface area of the given square were examined, and the Pythagorean Theorem formula application was displayed through examples. Moreover, in contrast to the textbook of Turkey, the textbook of Greece contained a fair amount of historical information, the converse of the Pythagorean Theorem, and applications and exercises intended for proving the theorem. It was also attention-grabbing that while most of the subjects in the Turkish textbook incorporated the GeoGebra application, no computer application was employed in the textbook of Greece.","PeriodicalId":156185,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Scientific Researches","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Scientific Researches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21733/IBADJOURNAL.584477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

几何在从儿童早期开始的数学教育中占有重要地位。教科书作为教育的根本指南,其比较分析结果在发现不足和缺陷、保持教育的时代性、处理数学概念使其融入教育中等方面有着明显的实质反映。希腊数学家在奠定几何基础方面做出了巨大贡献。因此,在比较分析中纳入希腊教科书被认为是重要的。本研究的目的是比较毕达哥拉斯定理的主题,以及它是如何在土耳其和希腊的数学教科书之间建立基础的,并揭示相似之处和对比。本研究采用文献分析法作为定性研究方法。对教科书进行内容分析,对教科书的比较分析结果进行编码和制表,并结合共同的主题进行解释。研究结果表明,希腊教科书在解释毕达哥拉斯定理之前,先介绍了平面表面积、平面测量单位、平面图形的面积,而毕达哥拉斯定理本身是通过面积公式来证明的。而土耳其教科书则介绍了中线、高度、角平分线、三角形的边关系、角边关系和三角形的绘制。考察了给定直角三角形的边长与给定正方形的表面积之间的关系,并通过实例说明了勾股定理公式的应用。此外,与土耳其的教科书相比,希腊的教科书包含了相当多的历史资料,勾股定理的反证,以及证明勾股定理的应用和练习。同样引人注目的是,虽然土耳其教科书中的大多数科目都采用了GeoGebra应用程序,但希腊教科书中没有使用计算机应用程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Türkiye–Yunanistan Matematik Ders Kitaplarının Karşılaştırmalı Analizi: Pisagor Teoremi ve Temellendirilmesi Örneği
Geometry has a significant place within mathematics education beginning from early ages of childhood. It is obvious that comparative analysis results of textbooks, which are the fundamental guides of education, have substantial reflections such as detecting shortcomings and flaws, keeping the education up to date and processing mathematical concepts to make them integrable into education. Greek mathematicians have immense contributions in terms of laying the foundations of geometry. Therefore, including Greek textbooks in the comparative analysis was deemed important. The aim of this study is to compare the subjects of Pythagorean Theorem and how it is grounded between the mathematics textbooks of Turkey and Greece, and to reveal similarities and contrasts. Document analysis as a qualitative research method was applied in the study. Conducting content analysis on textbooks, findings of the comparative analysis of the books were coded and tabulated, and interpreted by combining shared themes. The results of the study revealed that the Greek textbook introduced planar surface areas, surface measurement units and area of plane figures before explaining the Pythagorean Theorem while the theorem itself was clarified by being proven through area formulas. The Turkish textbook, on the other hand, introduced median, altitude, angle bisector, side relationships, angle-side relationships in triangles and drawing triangles. The relationship between side lengths of the given right triangle and surface area of the given square were examined, and the Pythagorean Theorem formula application was displayed through examples. Moreover, in contrast to the textbook of Turkey, the textbook of Greece contained a fair amount of historical information, the converse of the Pythagorean Theorem, and applications and exercises intended for proving the theorem. It was also attention-grabbing that while most of the subjects in the Turkish textbook incorporated the GeoGebra application, no computer application was employed in the textbook of Greece.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信