护士人员配备与患者预后:变异内与变异间分析

Uffe Bjerregaard, B. Hølge-Hazelton, S. Kristensen, K. Olsen
{"title":"护士人员配备与患者预后:变异内与变异间分析","authors":"Uffe Bjerregaard, B. Hølge-Hazelton, S. Kristensen, K. Olsen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3694304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To study and compare the longitudinal and cross-sectional relationship between nurse hours perpatient day and patient outcomes (30‐day mortality and length of stay [LOS]). Data source: Retrospective administrative register data (2015-2017) with all hospital admissions, LOS, andmortality rates from five medical departments combined with monthly data on staffing levels of registerednurses, physicians, and nurse assistants from the hospital’s payroll systems, as well as detailed patient-levelmorbidity and sociodemographic characteristics. Study design: We used a flexible within‐between random effect (REWB) model to exploit longitudinal andcross-sectional variation among homogenous medical departments. We applied a rich patient‐level dataset, leaving little risk of omitted variable bias due to patient‐level heterogeneity. Data Collection: The study population covered all hospital inpatient discharges from five medical departments over the period 2015-17 (N=172,132). Hospital payroll data were merged using hospital department identification codes. Principal findings: For both outcomes, we found evidence of endogeneity in within estimates when failing to control for patient heterogeneity. When controlling for patient characteristics, we found that a greater nurse to-patient ratio was associated with a statistically significant decrease in LOS when using both within- and between‐department variations. However, only between estimates were significant for nurses when it came to mortality, whereas the significance of the within estimate was absorbed by physicians. Conclusions: Most longitudinal studies apply fixed effects and, hence, only assess within variations. We found that between estimates were higher in magnitude and were more robust to omitted variable bias than within estimates. Therefore, as between variations are likely to identify structural recruitment problems, we argue for the importance of studying between estimators as well as in longitudinal studies.","PeriodicalId":239853,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Econometrics: Econometric & Statistical Methods - Special Topics (Topic)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurse Staffing and Patient Outcomes: Analyzing Within- and Between-Variation\",\"authors\":\"Uffe Bjerregaard, B. Hølge-Hazelton, S. Kristensen, K. Olsen\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3694304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To study and compare the longitudinal and cross-sectional relationship between nurse hours perpatient day and patient outcomes (30‐day mortality and length of stay [LOS]). Data source: Retrospective administrative register data (2015-2017) with all hospital admissions, LOS, andmortality rates from five medical departments combined with monthly data on staffing levels of registerednurses, physicians, and nurse assistants from the hospital’s payroll systems, as well as detailed patient-levelmorbidity and sociodemographic characteristics. Study design: We used a flexible within‐between random effect (REWB) model to exploit longitudinal andcross-sectional variation among homogenous medical departments. We applied a rich patient‐level dataset, leaving little risk of omitted variable bias due to patient‐level heterogeneity. Data Collection: The study population covered all hospital inpatient discharges from five medical departments over the period 2015-17 (N=172,132). Hospital payroll data were merged using hospital department identification codes. Principal findings: For both outcomes, we found evidence of endogeneity in within estimates when failing to control for patient heterogeneity. When controlling for patient characteristics, we found that a greater nurse to-patient ratio was associated with a statistically significant decrease in LOS when using both within- and between‐department variations. However, only between estimates were significant for nurses when it came to mortality, whereas the significance of the within estimate was absorbed by physicians. Conclusions: Most longitudinal studies apply fixed effects and, hence, only assess within variations. We found that between estimates were higher in magnitude and were more robust to omitted variable bias than within estimates. Therefore, as between variations are likely to identify structural recruitment problems, we argue for the importance of studying between estimators as well as in longitudinal studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":239853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Econometrics: Econometric & Statistical Methods - Special Topics (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Econometrics: Econometric & Statistical Methods - Special Topics (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3694304\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Econometrics: Econometric & Statistical Methods - Special Topics (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3694304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:研究和比较患者日护理时数与患者预后(30天死亡率和住院时间[LOS])之间的纵向和横断面关系。数据来源:回顾性行政登记数据(2015-2017年),包括五个医疗部门的所有住院率、LOS和死亡率,结合医院工资系统中注册护士、医生和护士助理的月度人员配备水平数据,以及详细的患者水平发病率和社会人口统计学特征。研究设计:我们使用灵活的内-间随机效应(REWB)模型来研究同质医学部门之间的纵向和横断面差异。我们采用了丰富的患者水平数据集,由于患者水平的异质性,忽略变量偏倚的风险很小。数据收集:研究人群涵盖2015-17年期间五个医疗部门的所有住院出院患者(N=172,132)。使用医院部门识别码合并医院工资数据。主要发现:对于这两个结果,我们在未能控制患者异质性的情况下发现了内生性的证据。在控制患者特征后,我们发现,在使用科室内和科室间差异时,更大的护士与患者比例与统计学上显著的LOS降低相关。然而,当涉及到死亡率时,只有估计值之间对护士有意义,而内部估计值的重要性被医生吸收。结论:大多数纵向研究应用的是固定效应,因此只能在变化范围内进行评估。我们发现,与内部估计相比,中间估计的幅度更高,对忽略变量偏差的稳健性更强。因此,由于变化之间很可能确定结构性招聘问题,我们认为在估计器之间以及纵向研究中进行研究的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nurse Staffing and Patient Outcomes: Analyzing Within- and Between-Variation
Objectives: To study and compare the longitudinal and cross-sectional relationship between nurse hours perpatient day and patient outcomes (30‐day mortality and length of stay [LOS]). Data source: Retrospective administrative register data (2015-2017) with all hospital admissions, LOS, andmortality rates from five medical departments combined with monthly data on staffing levels of registerednurses, physicians, and nurse assistants from the hospital’s payroll systems, as well as detailed patient-levelmorbidity and sociodemographic characteristics. Study design: We used a flexible within‐between random effect (REWB) model to exploit longitudinal andcross-sectional variation among homogenous medical departments. We applied a rich patient‐level dataset, leaving little risk of omitted variable bias due to patient‐level heterogeneity. Data Collection: The study population covered all hospital inpatient discharges from five medical departments over the period 2015-17 (N=172,132). Hospital payroll data were merged using hospital department identification codes. Principal findings: For both outcomes, we found evidence of endogeneity in within estimates when failing to control for patient heterogeneity. When controlling for patient characteristics, we found that a greater nurse to-patient ratio was associated with a statistically significant decrease in LOS when using both within- and between‐department variations. However, only between estimates were significant for nurses when it came to mortality, whereas the significance of the within estimate was absorbed by physicians. Conclusions: Most longitudinal studies apply fixed effects and, hence, only assess within variations. We found that between estimates were higher in magnitude and were more robust to omitted variable bias than within estimates. Therefore, as between variations are likely to identify structural recruitment problems, we argue for the importance of studying between estimators as well as in longitudinal studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信