1892年为争取《俄国人》杂志的斗争

M. Medovarov
{"title":"1892年为争取《俄国人》杂志的斗争","authors":"M. Medovarov","doi":"10.15382/sturii2022105.59-78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article contains the first attempt to analyze systematically the reasons, driving forces and results of the struggle for the editorial office journal in 1892. The history of the study of the problem, the achievements and mistakes of contemporaries and historians is considered. The chronology of the conflict is being reconstructed on the basis of the censorship case of Russkoe Obozrenie and the extensive correspondence of dozens of actors. The role of Konstantin Leontiev’s death in rallying his students and associates around Tertiy Filippov and at the beginning of Nikolai Boborykin’s attempts to take away Russkoe Obozrenie from Prince Dmitriy Tsertelev is demonstrated. The role of the journal’s sponsor David Morozov, chief censor Yevgeny Feoktistov and other interested persons in these events is being clarified. There are revealed the reasons for the nomination of Anatoly Alexandrov, little-known at that time, to the new editor of Russkoe Obozrenie, as well as the circle of his supporters and opponents. There are considered the reasons for the refusal to transfer the journal to him at the end of August 1892 and the permission that followed a month and a half later to approve Aleksandrov as editor and publisher. Evidence of the participation of prominent dignitaries and outstanding publicists in the struggle for Russkoe Obozrenie is being introduced into scientific circulation. The position of the Main Directorate for Press Affairs, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Office of the Moscow Governor-General, Grand Duke Sergei Alexandrovich, are analyzed. Attention is paid to the struggle of Konstantin Pobedonostsev and Tertiy Filippov for influence on the new editorial office of the journal and its political course. The adherence to Leontiev’s ideas is shown as a key factor in the formation of the circle of the young editorial board (Anatoly Alexandrov, Vasily Rozanov, Lev Tikhomirov, Rev’d. Joseph Fudel and others).","PeriodicalId":170812,"journal":{"name":"St.Tikhons' University Review","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The struggle for the journal \\\"Russkoe obozrenie\\\" in 1892\",\"authors\":\"M. Medovarov\",\"doi\":\"10.15382/sturii2022105.59-78\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article contains the first attempt to analyze systematically the reasons, driving forces and results of the struggle for the editorial office journal in 1892. The history of the study of the problem, the achievements and mistakes of contemporaries and historians is considered. The chronology of the conflict is being reconstructed on the basis of the censorship case of Russkoe Obozrenie and the extensive correspondence of dozens of actors. The role of Konstantin Leontiev’s death in rallying his students and associates around Tertiy Filippov and at the beginning of Nikolai Boborykin’s attempts to take away Russkoe Obozrenie from Prince Dmitriy Tsertelev is demonstrated. The role of the journal’s sponsor David Morozov, chief censor Yevgeny Feoktistov and other interested persons in these events is being clarified. There are revealed the reasons for the nomination of Anatoly Alexandrov, little-known at that time, to the new editor of Russkoe Obozrenie, as well as the circle of his supporters and opponents. There are considered the reasons for the refusal to transfer the journal to him at the end of August 1892 and the permission that followed a month and a half later to approve Aleksandrov as editor and publisher. Evidence of the participation of prominent dignitaries and outstanding publicists in the struggle for Russkoe Obozrenie is being introduced into scientific circulation. The position of the Main Directorate for Press Affairs, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Office of the Moscow Governor-General, Grand Duke Sergei Alexandrovich, are analyzed. Attention is paid to the struggle of Konstantin Pobedonostsev and Tertiy Filippov for influence on the new editorial office of the journal and its political course. The adherence to Leontiev’s ideas is shown as a key factor in the formation of the circle of the young editorial board (Anatoly Alexandrov, Vasily Rozanov, Lev Tikhomirov, Rev’d. Joseph Fudel and others).\",\"PeriodicalId\":170812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"St.Tikhons' University Review\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"St.Tikhons' University Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15382/sturii2022105.59-78\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"St.Tikhons' University Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15382/sturii2022105.59-78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文首次尝试系统分析1892年编辑部期刊斗争的原因、动力和结果。这一问题的历史研究,成就和错误的当代人和历史学家进行了考虑。根据Russkoe Obozrenie的审查案和数十名演员的广泛通信,冲突的年表正在重建。康斯坦丁·列昂捷耶夫的死在团结他的学生和同事在特里季菲利波夫周围的作用,以及在尼古拉·博博里金试图从德米特里·策尔捷列夫亲王手中夺走罗斯科·奥博兹连涅的开始,都得到了证明。该杂志的赞助者David Morozov、首席审查员Yevgeny Feoktistov和其他有关人士在这些事件中的角色正在得到澄清。阿纳托利·亚历山德罗夫被任命为《俄罗斯报》新任主编的原因,以及他的支持者和反对者的圈子,都被透露了出来。1892年8月底拒绝将杂志转让给他,以及一个半月后批准亚历山德罗夫担任编辑和出版商的原因被认为是有原因的。著名政要和杰出的政论家参与争取Russkoe Obozrenie的斗争的证据正在科学界流传。分析了新闻事务总局、内务部、莫斯科总督办公室、谢尔盖·亚历山德罗维奇大公的地位。人们关注的是康斯坦丁·波别多诺斯采夫和特里蒂·菲利波夫争夺对杂志新编辑部及其政治路线的影响。对列昂捷夫思想的坚持是形成年轻编辑委员会圈子的关键因素(阿纳托利·亚历山德罗夫,瓦西里·罗扎诺夫,列夫·蒂霍米罗夫,Rev 'd。Joseph Fudel等人)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The struggle for the journal "Russkoe obozrenie" in 1892
The article contains the first attempt to analyze systematically the reasons, driving forces and results of the struggle for the editorial office journal in 1892. The history of the study of the problem, the achievements and mistakes of contemporaries and historians is considered. The chronology of the conflict is being reconstructed on the basis of the censorship case of Russkoe Obozrenie and the extensive correspondence of dozens of actors. The role of Konstantin Leontiev’s death in rallying his students and associates around Tertiy Filippov and at the beginning of Nikolai Boborykin’s attempts to take away Russkoe Obozrenie from Prince Dmitriy Tsertelev is demonstrated. The role of the journal’s sponsor David Morozov, chief censor Yevgeny Feoktistov and other interested persons in these events is being clarified. There are revealed the reasons for the nomination of Anatoly Alexandrov, little-known at that time, to the new editor of Russkoe Obozrenie, as well as the circle of his supporters and opponents. There are considered the reasons for the refusal to transfer the journal to him at the end of August 1892 and the permission that followed a month and a half later to approve Aleksandrov as editor and publisher. Evidence of the participation of prominent dignitaries and outstanding publicists in the struggle for Russkoe Obozrenie is being introduced into scientific circulation. The position of the Main Directorate for Press Affairs, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Office of the Moscow Governor-General, Grand Duke Sergei Alexandrovich, are analyzed. Attention is paid to the struggle of Konstantin Pobedonostsev and Tertiy Filippov for influence on the new editorial office of the journal and its political course. The adherence to Leontiev’s ideas is shown as a key factor in the formation of the circle of the young editorial board (Anatoly Alexandrov, Vasily Rozanov, Lev Tikhomirov, Rev’d. Joseph Fudel and others).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信