佩金帕暴力的荷马力量

A Uniquely American Epic Pub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI:10.2307/j.ctvqmp3rj.5

Michael Sragow

{"title":"佩金帕暴力的荷马力量","authors":"Michael Sragow","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvqmp3rj.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Michael Sragow’s essay outlines the conflict between Warner Bros. and the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) over the X rating that the MPAA initially gave to the proposed rerelease of The Wild Bunch in 1993. Sragow also discusses the film’s depiction of violence and how, in contrast to many other movies, the film is not self-indulgent in depicting it.","PeriodicalId":193542,"journal":{"name":"A Uniquely American Epic","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Homeric Power of Peckinpah’s Violence\",\"authors\":\"Michael Sragow\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctvqmp3rj.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Michael Sragow’s essay outlines the conflict between Warner Bros. and the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) over the X rating that the MPAA initially gave to the proposed rerelease of The Wild Bunch in 1993. Sragow also discusses the film’s depiction of violence and how, in contrast to many other movies, the film is not self-indulgent in depicting it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"A Uniquely American Epic\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"A Uniquely American Epic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvqmp3rj.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A Uniquely American Epic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvqmp3rj.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

Michael Sragow的文章概述了华纳兄弟公司和美国电影协会(MPAA)之间的冲突，因为MPAA最初在1993年给《Wild Bunch》的重新发行计划定了X级。斯拉格还讨论了这部电影对暴力的描绘，以及与许多其他电影相比，这部电影在描绘暴力时并不自我放纵。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Homeric Power of Peckinpah’s Violence

Michael Sragow’s essay outlines the conflict between Warner Bros. and the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) over the X rating that the MPAA initially gave to the proposed rerelease of The Wild Bunch in 1993. Sragow also discusses the film’s depiction of violence and how, in contrast to many other movies, the film is not self-indulgent in depicting it.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

A Uniquely American Epic

自引率

0.00%

发文量