纳撒尼尔·霍桑对弥尔顿所讲述的事物的重构:文学影响与布利斯代尔的同性恋面具

Matthew Joseph Helm
{"title":"纳撒尼尔·霍桑对弥尔顿所讲述的事物的重构:文学影响与布利斯代尔的同性恋面具","authors":"Matthew Joseph Helm","doi":"10.5325/nathhawtrevi.47.2.0250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article situates Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Blithedale Romance (1852) within the debates around Fourierism, marriage, and Hawthorne’s literary legacy that took place in contemporary US magazines and periodicals in the mid-nineteenth century. In doing so, I rely on two notions of influence. First, while many periodicals regarded Hawthorne as a potential representative of a new national literature, they remained wary of the influence his unorthodox portrayals of marriage might have on readers and on the status of the nuclear family as the foundation of a sound society. Publications like The Southern Quarterly and The Church Review, and Ecclesiastical Register featured articles wishing that Hawthorne would fall in line with the British tradition of the neat marriage-plot, thus upholding the sanctity of marriage and securing his place within a burgeoning American literary canon. Second, I reframe Hawthorne’s relationship to his received literary patrimony, arguing that The Blithedale Romance queers the influence of the Miltonic masque tradition. In contrast to previous scholarship, which often seeks one-to-one allegories between the intertexts, I argue that The Blithedale Romance continually reappropriates situations and recasts characters from Milton’s Comus to expose contradictions and inconsistencies within hetero-patriarchal lineage and literary inheritance.","PeriodicalId":261601,"journal":{"name":"Nathaniel Hawthorne Review","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Nathaniel Hawthorne’s Reframing of That ‘which Milton tells about’: Literary Influence and Blithedale’s Queer Masque”\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Joseph Helm\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/nathhawtrevi.47.2.0250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article situates Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Blithedale Romance (1852) within the debates around Fourierism, marriage, and Hawthorne’s literary legacy that took place in contemporary US magazines and periodicals in the mid-nineteenth century. In doing so, I rely on two notions of influence. First, while many periodicals regarded Hawthorne as a potential representative of a new national literature, they remained wary of the influence his unorthodox portrayals of marriage might have on readers and on the status of the nuclear family as the foundation of a sound society. Publications like The Southern Quarterly and The Church Review, and Ecclesiastical Register featured articles wishing that Hawthorne would fall in line with the British tradition of the neat marriage-plot, thus upholding the sanctity of marriage and securing his place within a burgeoning American literary canon. Second, I reframe Hawthorne’s relationship to his received literary patrimony, arguing that The Blithedale Romance queers the influence of the Miltonic masque tradition. In contrast to previous scholarship, which often seeks one-to-one allegories between the intertexts, I argue that The Blithedale Romance continually reappropriates situations and recasts characters from Milton’s Comus to expose contradictions and inconsistencies within hetero-patriarchal lineage and literary inheritance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":261601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nathaniel Hawthorne Review\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nathaniel Hawthorne Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/nathhawtrevi.47.2.0250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nathaniel Hawthorne Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/nathhawtrevi.47.2.0250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将纳撒尼尔·霍桑的《逍遥谷传奇》(1852)置于19世纪中期美国当代杂志和期刊围绕傅里叶主义、婚姻和霍桑文学遗产的争论中。在这样做的过程中,我依赖于影响力的两个概念。首先,虽然许多期刊认为霍桑是一种新的民族文学的潜在代表,但他们仍然警惕他对婚姻的非正统描绘可能对读者产生的影响,以及对核心家庭作为健全社会基础的地位的影响。《南方季刊》、《教会评论》和《教会纪事》等刊物都发表了文章,希望霍桑能遵循英国传统的简洁婚姻情节,从而维护婚姻的神圣性,并确保他在蓬勃发展的美国文学经典中的地位。其次,我重新定义了霍桑与其公认的文学遗产的关系,认为《欢乐谷浪漫》是弥尔顿假面舞会传统的影响。与之前的学术研究相反,他们经常在互文之间寻找一对一的寓言,我认为,《享乐谷浪漫》不断地重新利用弥尔顿的《Comus》中的情境和人物,以暴露异性父权谱系和文学遗产中的矛盾和不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Nathaniel Hawthorne’s Reframing of That ‘which Milton tells about’: Literary Influence and Blithedale’s Queer Masque”
This article situates Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Blithedale Romance (1852) within the debates around Fourierism, marriage, and Hawthorne’s literary legacy that took place in contemporary US magazines and periodicals in the mid-nineteenth century. In doing so, I rely on two notions of influence. First, while many periodicals regarded Hawthorne as a potential representative of a new national literature, they remained wary of the influence his unorthodox portrayals of marriage might have on readers and on the status of the nuclear family as the foundation of a sound society. Publications like The Southern Quarterly and The Church Review, and Ecclesiastical Register featured articles wishing that Hawthorne would fall in line with the British tradition of the neat marriage-plot, thus upholding the sanctity of marriage and securing his place within a burgeoning American literary canon. Second, I reframe Hawthorne’s relationship to his received literary patrimony, arguing that The Blithedale Romance queers the influence of the Miltonic masque tradition. In contrast to previous scholarship, which often seeks one-to-one allegories between the intertexts, I argue that The Blithedale Romance continually reappropriates situations and recasts characters from Milton’s Comus to expose contradictions and inconsistencies within hetero-patriarchal lineage and literary inheritance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信