重新想象赋权:糖尿病研究中赋权理论的批判性回顾

HR Walker
{"title":"重新想象赋权:糖尿病研究中赋权理论的批判性回顾","authors":"HR Walker","doi":"10.13188/2475-5591.1000016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diabetes, well documented as a complicated condition, has been the focus of self-management studies for over three decades. Empowerment theory has co-developed within diabetes literature at the same time. However, this literature lacks a core and standard definition, which has led to incongruencies in theory and relative terminology. In this critical review, the construct of empowerment in diabetes literature is dissected and examined. Prominent measures and methods are problematized to highlight their overreliance on individual behavior rather than systemic social change. Current interventions targeting empowerment focus almost exclusively on individual behavior-change, inadvertently suggesting that the location of the problem of poor management lies within the abilities, attitudes, and beliefs of individuals. This paper argues that there has to be a socially-based power-related shift from one group to another in the process of empowerment for its construct to be complete, and that the ultimate agent of change must shift from the patient to systemic barriers in their way. Examples of online patient community-generated definitions, resources, and practices of empowerment are highlighted, leading to an argument that researchers and healthcare providers ought to add nuance to the construct of empowerment by weaving in community and systems levels change goals.","PeriodicalId":142531,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Diabetes & Endocrinology","volume":"354 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reimagining Empowerment: A Critical Review of Empowerment Theory in Diabetes Research\",\"authors\":\"HR Walker\",\"doi\":\"10.13188/2475-5591.1000016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Diabetes, well documented as a complicated condition, has been the focus of self-management studies for over three decades. Empowerment theory has co-developed within diabetes literature at the same time. However, this literature lacks a core and standard definition, which has led to incongruencies in theory and relative terminology. In this critical review, the construct of empowerment in diabetes literature is dissected and examined. Prominent measures and methods are problematized to highlight their overreliance on individual behavior rather than systemic social change. Current interventions targeting empowerment focus almost exclusively on individual behavior-change, inadvertently suggesting that the location of the problem of poor management lies within the abilities, attitudes, and beliefs of individuals. This paper argues that there has to be a socially-based power-related shift from one group to another in the process of empowerment for its construct to be complete, and that the ultimate agent of change must shift from the patient to systemic barriers in their way. Examples of online patient community-generated definitions, resources, and practices of empowerment are highlighted, leading to an argument that researchers and healthcare providers ought to add nuance to the construct of empowerment by weaving in community and systems levels change goals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142531,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Diabetes & Endocrinology\",\"volume\":\"354 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Diabetes & Endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13188/2475-5591.1000016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Diabetes & Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13188/2475-5591.1000016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

糖尿病作为一种复杂的疾病,在过去的三十多年里一直是自我管理研究的焦点。与此同时,授权理论在糖尿病文献中也得到了发展。然而,这些文献缺乏一个核心和标准的定义,导致理论和相关术语不一致。在这个关键的审查,授权在糖尿病文献的结构是解剖和检查。突出的措施和方法被质疑,以突出它们对个人行为的过度依赖,而不是系统性的社会变革。目前针对赋权的干预措施几乎完全集中在个人行为改变上,这无意中表明,管理不善的问题在于个人的能力、态度和信念。本文认为,在赋予权力的过程中,必须有一个基于社会的权力相关的转移,从一个群体转移到另一个群体,才能使其结构完整,而且变革的最终推动者必须从患者转移到阻碍他们的系统性障碍。本文强调了在线患者社区生成的授权定义、资源和实践的例子,这导致了一种观点,即研究人员和医疗保健提供者应该通过将社区和系统级别的变化目标编织在一起,为授权的构建增加细微差别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reimagining Empowerment: A Critical Review of Empowerment Theory in Diabetes Research
Diabetes, well documented as a complicated condition, has been the focus of self-management studies for over three decades. Empowerment theory has co-developed within diabetes literature at the same time. However, this literature lacks a core and standard definition, which has led to incongruencies in theory and relative terminology. In this critical review, the construct of empowerment in diabetes literature is dissected and examined. Prominent measures and methods are problematized to highlight their overreliance on individual behavior rather than systemic social change. Current interventions targeting empowerment focus almost exclusively on individual behavior-change, inadvertently suggesting that the location of the problem of poor management lies within the abilities, attitudes, and beliefs of individuals. This paper argues that there has to be a socially-based power-related shift from one group to another in the process of empowerment for its construct to be complete, and that the ultimate agent of change must shift from the patient to systemic barriers in their way. Examples of online patient community-generated definitions, resources, and practices of empowerment are highlighted, leading to an argument that researchers and healthcare providers ought to add nuance to the construct of empowerment by weaving in community and systems levels change goals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信