“文明社会的纽带”;

{"title":"“文明社会的纽带”;","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvhn0cxk.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The United States has historically pursued security in the Western Hemisphere with singular purpose. For more than a century, policymakers have worked to construct a sphere of influence in the region through which U.S. officials could enforce internal political stability and preempt external meddling by European powers, actions designed to advance the nation’s security interests. The United States has done so through the accumulation and projection of overwhelming economic, military, and political power—hegemony—relative to individual states in the region. To be sure, ideology, domestic politics, and the actions of Latin American governments have all influenced and shaped U.S. policies and outcomes—in certain cases decisively so. Yet the only consistently reliable guide to understanding the contours of inter-American state-to-state relations remains security. As political scientist Lars Schoultz argues: “If one wants to understand the core of United States policy toward Latin America, one studies security.”1 In this chapter, I explore the salience of that factor, focusing in particular on the Cold War and the attendant pursuit of it in Paraguay. For reasons rooted in that nation’s history, however, officials in Washington feared that the attainment of security would founder in the face of chronic political instability in Asunción. But with the rise to power of Alfredo Stroessner in 1954, those fears were quelled by the appearance of an authoritarian leader who was uniquely positioned to maintain political order and stability in Paraguay, and hence protect U.S. security interests.","PeriodicalId":320021,"journal":{"name":"The Dictator Dilemma","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“TIES OF CIVILIZED SOCIETY”:\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctvhn0cxk.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The United States has historically pursued security in the Western Hemisphere with singular purpose. For more than a century, policymakers have worked to construct a sphere of influence in the region through which U.S. officials could enforce internal political stability and preempt external meddling by European powers, actions designed to advance the nation’s security interests. The United States has done so through the accumulation and projection of overwhelming economic, military, and political power—hegemony—relative to individual states in the region. To be sure, ideology, domestic politics, and the actions of Latin American governments have all influenced and shaped U.S. policies and outcomes—in certain cases decisively so. Yet the only consistently reliable guide to understanding the contours of inter-American state-to-state relations remains security. As political scientist Lars Schoultz argues: “If one wants to understand the core of United States policy toward Latin America, one studies security.”1 In this chapter, I explore the salience of that factor, focusing in particular on the Cold War and the attendant pursuit of it in Paraguay. For reasons rooted in that nation’s history, however, officials in Washington feared that the attainment of security would founder in the face of chronic political instability in Asunción. But with the rise to power of Alfredo Stroessner in 1954, those fears were quelled by the appearance of an authoritarian leader who was uniquely positioned to maintain political order and stability in Paraguay, and hence protect U.S. security interests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":320021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Dictator Dilemma\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Dictator Dilemma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvhn0cxk.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Dictator Dilemma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvhn0cxk.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

历史上,美国在西半球追求安全的目的只有一个。一个多世纪以来,政策制定者一直致力于在该地区建立一个势力范围,通过这个范围,美国官员可以加强内部政治稳定,先发制人地阻止欧洲大国的外部干预,这些行动旨在促进美国的安全利益。美国是通过积累和投射压倒性的经济、军事和政治力量——相对于该地区的个别国家——霸权来做到这一点的。可以肯定的是,意识形态、国内政治和拉美政府的行动都影响和塑造了美国的政策和结果——在某些情况下是决定性的。然而,要理解美洲国家间关系的轮廓,唯一始终可靠的指南仍然是安全问题。正如政治学家拉尔斯·舒尔茨(Lars Schoultz)所言:“如果想了解美国对拉美政策的核心,就要研究安全问题。“1在本章中,我将探讨这一因素的显著性,特别着重于冷战以及随之而来的巴拉圭对冷战的追求。然而,由于根植于该国历史的原因,华盛顿的官员担心,面对Asunción长期的政治不稳定,实现安全的努力将会失败。但是,随着1954年阿尔弗雷多·斯特罗斯纳(Alfredo Stroessner)掌权,这些担忧被一位专制领导人的出现所平息,这位领导人在维持巴拉圭的政治秩序和稳定方面处于独特的地位,从而保护了美国的安全利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“TIES OF CIVILIZED SOCIETY”:
The United States has historically pursued security in the Western Hemisphere with singular purpose. For more than a century, policymakers have worked to construct a sphere of influence in the region through which U.S. officials could enforce internal political stability and preempt external meddling by European powers, actions designed to advance the nation’s security interests. The United States has done so through the accumulation and projection of overwhelming economic, military, and political power—hegemony—relative to individual states in the region. To be sure, ideology, domestic politics, and the actions of Latin American governments have all influenced and shaped U.S. policies and outcomes—in certain cases decisively so. Yet the only consistently reliable guide to understanding the contours of inter-American state-to-state relations remains security. As political scientist Lars Schoultz argues: “If one wants to understand the core of United States policy toward Latin America, one studies security.”1 In this chapter, I explore the salience of that factor, focusing in particular on the Cold War and the attendant pursuit of it in Paraguay. For reasons rooted in that nation’s history, however, officials in Washington feared that the attainment of security would founder in the face of chronic political instability in Asunción. But with the rise to power of Alfredo Stroessner in 1954, those fears were quelled by the appearance of an authoritarian leader who was uniquely positioned to maintain political order and stability in Paraguay, and hence protect U.S. security interests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信