多中心试验中患者的计算机辅助分类和评估。

G B Cassano, L Conti, P Castrogiovanni, J Levine
{"title":"多中心试验中患者的计算机辅助分类和评估。","authors":"G B Cassano,&nbsp;L Conti,&nbsp;P Castrogiovanni,&nbsp;J Levine","doi":"10.1055/s-0028-1094587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The automated diagnostic procedure appears to be particularly suitable for clinical psychopharmacological trials since it provides a diagnostic definition and a psychopathological profile of patients assessed by various investigators of different centers where a different kind of psychopathology as well as different cultural, clinical and psychopharmacological backgrounds may be present. Furthermore, this procedure offers the possibility of reexamining and analyzing the characteristics of the experimental sample as related to the responses to the drugs. It also provides a new approach for solving some of the problems which play an important role in determining divergent results in clinical psychopharmacology such as that of patients selection and diagnostic definition. In the present study the automated diagnostic procedure derived by the scores of each item of I.M.P.S. and by factor scores are evaluated comparatively. The data reported show that the automated diagnosis should be based on the scores of single aspects of the symptomatology rather than on the basis of the factor scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":76325,"journal":{"name":"Pharmakopsychiatrie, Neuro-Psychopharmakologie","volume":"11 6","pages":"285-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0028-1094587","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computer-aided classification and assessment of patients in multicenter trials.\",\"authors\":\"G B Cassano,&nbsp;L Conti,&nbsp;P Castrogiovanni,&nbsp;J Levine\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0028-1094587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The automated diagnostic procedure appears to be particularly suitable for clinical psychopharmacological trials since it provides a diagnostic definition and a psychopathological profile of patients assessed by various investigators of different centers where a different kind of psychopathology as well as different cultural, clinical and psychopharmacological backgrounds may be present. Furthermore, this procedure offers the possibility of reexamining and analyzing the characteristics of the experimental sample as related to the responses to the drugs. It also provides a new approach for solving some of the problems which play an important role in determining divergent results in clinical psychopharmacology such as that of patients selection and diagnostic definition. In the present study the automated diagnostic procedure derived by the scores of each item of I.M.P.S. and by factor scores are evaluated comparatively. The data reported show that the automated diagnosis should be based on the scores of single aspects of the symptomatology rather than on the basis of the factor scores.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmakopsychiatrie, Neuro-Psychopharmakologie\",\"volume\":\"11 6\",\"pages\":\"285-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0028-1094587\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmakopsychiatrie, Neuro-Psychopharmakologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1094587\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmakopsychiatrie, Neuro-Psychopharmakologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1094587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自动诊断程序似乎特别适合临床精神药理学试验,因为它提供了由不同中心的不同研究者评估的诊断定义和患者的精神病理学概况,不同的精神病理学以及不同的文化、临床和精神药理学背景可能存在。此外,该程序提供了重新检查和分析与药物反应相关的实验样品特征的可能性。这也为解决临床精神药理学中一些影响结果分歧的重要问题,如患者选择和诊断定义,提供了一种新的途径。在本研究中,比较评价了由I.M.P.S.各项目得分和因子得分得出的自动诊断程序。报告的数据表明,自动诊断应该基于症状的单个方面的得分,而不是基于因素得分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Computer-aided classification and assessment of patients in multicenter trials.

The automated diagnostic procedure appears to be particularly suitable for clinical psychopharmacological trials since it provides a diagnostic definition and a psychopathological profile of patients assessed by various investigators of different centers where a different kind of psychopathology as well as different cultural, clinical and psychopharmacological backgrounds may be present. Furthermore, this procedure offers the possibility of reexamining and analyzing the characteristics of the experimental sample as related to the responses to the drugs. It also provides a new approach for solving some of the problems which play an important role in determining divergent results in clinical psychopharmacology such as that of patients selection and diagnostic definition. In the present study the automated diagnostic procedure derived by the scores of each item of I.M.P.S. and by factor scores are evaluated comparatively. The data reported show that the automated diagnosis should be based on the scores of single aspects of the symptomatology rather than on the basis of the factor scores.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信